RE: Cisco WLC Stable code in 8.5 train

2020-06-26 Thread Bryn Jones
We have been running 8.5.161.0 for the last 30 days without incident. We are in the same situation as you with regards to the 3500/3600 models restricting us going any higher. Regards ] Bryn Bryn Jones IT Technical Lead University of Leeds (UK) @home From: Tariq

RE: Cisco WLC Stable code in 8.5 train

2020-06-26 Thread Scharloo, Gertjan
Hi all, We have some serious issues with 8.5.161.x . We are now trying 8.5.161.5 ) Zoom / Team / Skype4Business customers are complaining . We see Drops on our Access-switch (port) <-> Access-Points 2802 packet drops could be explained by CSCvq90572 Receive throughput degrades for

RE: Cisco WLC Stable code in 8.5 train

2020-06-26 Thread Tariq Adnan
Thanks Bryn for the reply. Just curious, did you run the WLAN Poller before upgrade and were there any Aps identified having flash corruption issue? - Cheers, Kind regards, Tariq Adnan | Senior Network Engineer ICT, Campus Network Services THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY 316 Abercrombie Street,

RE: Cisco WLC Stable code in 8.5 train

2020-06-26 Thread Sullivan, Don
We are running 8.5.161.0 and have experienced no issues. We did not run the WLAN poller before the upgrade. Don Sullivan Network Administrator Technology Services 205-726-2111 | office dsulli...@samford.edu LinkedIn

RE: Cisco WLC Stable code in 8.5 train

2020-06-26 Thread Kushner, Jeff
We had to upgrade to 8.5.161.4 due to issues we experienced with the 8.5.161.0. We had a problem where an AP would allow clients to associate but they would not pass traffic. The new code, as recommended by TAC appears to have fixed the issue, we have been running it for 36 days. But we won’t

RE: WLC 8.10.121 Deferred

2020-06-26 Thread Tariq Adnan
Hello Dennis, You are hitting a bug CSCvu24770: 1. Some Android 10 devices having issues connecting to wireless network * Some devices from Nokia, Sony and Xiaomi running Android 10 and having specific Qualcomm chipsets

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC 8.10.121 Deferred

2020-06-26 Thread Paul Smith
Q. Are you by any chance running WPA2 + WPA3 Enterprise with both the WPA2 and WPA3 boxes checked? We are currently on 8.10.121 and seeing this issue as well primarily with Windows devices. I have not seen any issues with Macs and authentication. A. No. WPA2 + WPA3, but only WPA2 is checked.

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC 8.10.121 Deferred

2020-06-26 Thread Mallon, Jason
We have WPA2 and WPA3 checked at this time. The only issue we have seen have been with Windows 10 devices. We have a handful of Android 10 devices that as far as I know are mainly Pixel and Samsung that have not had issues. No Mac issues that I have heard about. Jason Mallon Network

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC 8.10.121 Deferred

2020-06-26 Thread Ciesinski, Nick
Interesting. For us it’s like one particular area with one particular mode of AP we don’t have anyplace else. It magically went away again today too. Nick Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 26, 2020, at 5:12 PM, Paul Smith wrote: > > *EXTERNAL EMAIL* > > Q. Are you by any chance running WPA2

RE: WLC 8.10.121 Deferred

2020-06-26 Thread Dennis Xu
Hi Hector, The FT disabled option does not help. The only way to get these Android devices connected is to use FT enabled. Dennis From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv On Behalf Of Rios, Hector J Sent: Friday, June 26, 2020 2:32 PM To:

RE: WLC 8.10.121 Deferred

2020-06-26 Thread Dennis Xu
We have upgraded to 8.10.121.0 for one month. We have seen some devices not able to connect. When they run into this issue, we don’t see any association requests from the devices. There are something in the beacon which are not liked by the devices so they do not want to join. Not a lot of

RE: WLC 8.10.121 Deferred

2020-06-26 Thread Rios, Hector J
Dennis, Have you tested your Android devices with FT disabled? (instead of FT Adaptive). I would be curious to hear what results you get. Thanks, Hector Rios, Wireless Network Architect The University of Texas at Austin From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv On Behalf

RE: WLC 8.10.121 Deferred

2020-06-26 Thread Letts, Richard J
We had that problem with 350x series AP ~ 18 months ago. I'll have to dig out the exact version number number but it was on the 8.3/8.5 train. There was a memory leak in the AP. Clients were not moving from authentication to the AP through the association phase on the controller. (these terms

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC 8.10.121 Deferred

2020-06-26 Thread Christina Klam
All, FYI: I noticed that "over-the-ds" setting changed when we upgraded from 8.5 to 8.10.121.0. There may be other settings that changed as well. Christina Klam Network Engineer Institute for Advanced Study 1 Einstein Dr Princeton, NJ 08540 (m) +1 609-751-7899 (o) +1 609-734-8154

RE: WLC 8.10.121 Deferred

2020-06-26 Thread Paul Smith
We were running 8.10.121 on our 5520 and began having authentication issues. It is weird because radius isn't even seeing the attempts (or weren't logging rejections). The behavior persists even using local authentication. Eventually we can get the clients to connect, but it takes a number of

Re: WLC 8.10.121 Deferred

2020-06-26 Thread Mallon, Jason
Paul, Are you by any chance running WPA2 + WPA3 Enterprise with both the WPA2 and WPA3 boxes checked? We are currently on 8.10.121 and seeing this issue as well primarily with Windows devices. I have not seen any issues with Macs and authentication. Jason Mallon Network Engineer III, OIT

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] WLC 8.10.121 Deferred

2020-06-26 Thread Christina Klam
We had the EXACT same issue in April. TAC was useless. We just rolled back to the earlier train, 8.5.161 in order to get everyone connecting again. As we are hoping to move back to the 8.10.X train this summer to get the DNAC benefits again, I will continue to watch this thread. Christina