Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread Martin Jr., D. Michael
In the past, we have always setup wireless access points to use channels 3, 6, and 11, since these channels are the non-overlapping channels. We have tried to be careful in spacing out APs and picking one of these three channels where it seems appropriate to prevent interference from one

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread John Watters
We let our Cisco WiSM controllers pick the channels. Works as well as could be expected with the number of rogues we have, particularly in the dorms. If using the AMP management platform, you can let it optimize your channels. And, it is not 3, 6, 11 that are non-overlapping, but 1, 6, 11.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread Lee H Badman
Michael- You do mean 1, 6, and 11- yes? -Lee Lee H. Badman Wireless/Network Engineer Information Technology and Services Syracuse University 315 443-3003 -Original Message- From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Jr.,

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread Bentley, Douglas
We also let our Cisco WiSM select to best channels but we do limit it to channels 1,6,11. -Doug Douglas R. Bentley University Information Technology Systems Engineering Group 727 Elmwood Avenue, Suite 132 Rochester, NY 14620 Office: (585) 275-6550 Fax:(585) 273-1013

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread Scholz, Greg
In Meru you pick the channel but it uses a single channel across the entire SSID when in virtual cell mode, not per AP. (this is part of the special sauce that they got beat up for a while ago by other vendors implying they were breaking the standard) So we don't have to worry about overlapping

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread James R. Pardonek
We use Trapeze and let it auto tune both channel and power. Works extremely well especially if you lose an access point. The surrounding ones fill in the gap. Jim James Pardonek CISSP Senior Network Admistrator Purdue University Calumet - Original Message - From: The EDUCAUSE

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread John York
I don't know how big your installation is, but once you get over a dozen or so AP's, it really is worth getting a wireless LAN controller of some sort. We have a Cisco 4402 (comments about Cisco/Microsoft and herd mentality deleted). Managing the AP's manually gets to be a real pain at that

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread Manoj Abeysekera
We used dynamic channel and power settings of Cisco WLC's for a while until one day for some unknown reason all the channel decided to use 1(may be an extreme case of wide are interference!). Ever since I manually set up both Power and Channels. We also have a distributed Antenna system so it

RE: Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread Johnson, Neil M
We have both Meru and Cisco AP's. For Meru we put each controller on either channel 1 or 11, because it seems most SOHO routers choose channel 6. In high density locations (auditoriums) we will put AP's on different channels to increase density. For the Cisco AP's we enable Radio Resource

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread John Watters
Even with controllers (we currently have 9 WiSMs, each of which contains two controllers), the AMP product is very useful for coordinating the controllers. We tried the Cisco WCS product (and still have it), but found the AMP much easier to drive. It will manage both controllers and APs. The APs

RE: Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread Martin Jr., D. Michael
I appreciate all the input about using controller based models and various software products but given the fact that is not what we have in place I was really look for more advice on which path to take on what we have. In our environment there is no centralized budget for wireless, or any other

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread James R. Pardonek
Prior to having a controller based environment, we used the 1 6 11 method you describe. We did however stress to the administration the need for a policy that gave the IT department exclusive access to the wireless airspace. This gave us the authority to find and remove rogues. It was also the

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread Lee H Badman
Michael- We jumped to lightweight APs at about the 450 AP count. Prior to that, we did about 50 APs completely manually, with no central management. At about 50, we did get Cisco's WLSE- which at the time cost us under $10K in appliance form. We still use this to manage our point to point

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread Hector J Rios
Michael, To answer your question, when we had autonomous APs a couple of years ago we configured most of them with the least congested channel option and it worked fine. If anything, it will help to avoid co-channel interference in the presence of a rogue AP. Hector Rios Louisiana State

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Channel Selection on APs

2008-10-16 Thread ptedu
Martin Jr., D. Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/16/2008 8:52 AM In the past, we have always setup wireless access points to use channels 3, 6, and 11, since these channels are the non-overlapping channels. We have tried to be careful in spacing out APs and picking one of these three