Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:09:59 -0600 From: Rob Crockett
crocke...@obu.edu Subject: Cisco Aironet 1140 vs 1250
I'm interested in knowing experiences others have had in deploying
the = new Cisco Aironet 1140s.
I've got an AP1140 for eval and the biggest reason that I haven't done
more with it
per cisco's documentation the 1140 should only be ceiling mounted.
This is because of the antenna design. The 1252 isn't long for this
world.
Mike
On 2/16/09, Rob Crockett crocke...@obu.edu wrote:
I'm interested in knowing experiences others have had in deploying the new
Cisco Aironet 1140s.
FYI - this still appears to be an LWAPP recovery/upgrade image...how can they
get away with not having IOS? What about Hybrid Mode support?
Bruce T. Johnson | Network Engineer | Partners Healthcare
Network Engineering | 617.726.9662 | Pager: 31633 | bjohns...@partners.org |
149 13th Street,
We are currently looking to go totally wireless in two of our classrooms on
campus. The rooms are back to back and we anticipate 90 users in each
classroom, simultaneously. We are a totally Cisco shop and will not be using
N for this deployment. The initial design plan calls for 5 APs in each
We have a dense deployment of APs here. Typically we try to keep the
number of users per AP to around a 1:9 ratio.
What we found is that if you do not tweak the beacon period then the G
spectrum ends up with around 20% of the available bandwidth being
consumed by management traffic in a
Thank you. I hadn't considered the beacon interval in too much detail. I will
make sure I add this into the calculations. We also block multicast at this
time as well.
Chip
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf
Hi Chip,
I'm curious why you would not be using 802.11n on a new deployment?
Are you planning to purchase the APs new? I imagine a great pre-owned
market for abg only APs. I can think of one site that would love to
be able to sell their 1132s to migrate to the new 1142s (assuming
appropriate
Johnson, Bruce T wrote:
Hi Everyone,
The following Cisco wireless LAN software was recently published:
IOS
c1140-rcvk9w8-tar.124-18a.JA1.tar
http://ftp-sj.cisco.com/swc/esd/02/crypto/3DES/282439881/contract/c1140-rcvk9w8-
tar.124-18a.JA1.tar
My Cisco sales guy just told me that Autonomous IOS firmware for the
AP1140 should be out sometime in April.
--
Earl Barfield -- Academic Research Tech / Information Technology
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
Internet: earl.barfi...@oit.gatech.edue...@gatech.edu
Thanks Earl,
I guess we'll need an LWAPP to IOS downgrade tool until then (the crossover
cable net 10 TFTP static file technique)..
Bruce T. Johnson | Network Engineer | Partners Healthcare
Network Engineering | 617.726.9662 | Pager: 31633 | bjohns...@partners.org |
149 13th Street, 10th
For dense deployments, where you're not trying to leverage the potential
rang-oriented benefits of MIMO, you could probably safely survey with a
non-11n AP in both bands. All you'll really lose is data rate
quantification, but my early 11n testing shows that data rates are all
over the place any
Thanks Rick. Unfortunately in the building were this is being completed, the
student requirements are for a G radio. Not all of our students have A radios,
but this is a point we will consider for the new standard in the fall. Thanks
for the suggestions.
Chip
-Original Message-
Sorry for the unintended etiquette violation with my earlier post and
for this additional intrusion. I meant to forward, not reply to the
list.
Mike Ruiz
(yes thanks for asking, I still work for Meru since leaving academia)
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Lee H Badman lhbad...@syr.edu wrote:
13 matches
Mail list logo
