Hello All,
I recently configured multiple /24 subnets into a wireless interface group
on my controllers, in an effort to cut down on multicast as well as
increase the IP address space. It seems to be working but DHCP addresses
are still being consumed at an alarming rate. Is anyone else using
What version are you running on jour WLC?
I know that there were hashing problems on older versions off 7.0 that
resulted in that when a client reassociated it didnt come back to its
former subnet.
Try newer versions of 7.0 or 7.2 and Ill guess that it will work.
It solved my problem. ;)
Version 7.2.111.3 That seems to be exactly what is currently happening.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Anders Nilsson
anders.nils...@adm.umu.sewrote:
What version are you running on jour WLC?
I know that there were hashing problems on older versions off 7.0 that
resulted in that when a
On 2/15/2013 2:13 PM, Vikki Cutrone wrote:
Is anyone else using the interface group feature?
Yes.
and if so is it working as expected?
Yes.
Great feature, happy it finally happened!
-Rick
--
Rick Coloccia, Jr.
Network Manager
State University of NY College at Geneseo
1 College Circle,
Dear All
Do you use different radius servers for your local SSID and eduroam SSID?
Currently, we are using the same radius servers for both of SSID, and we found
that some of our local users login with eduroam SSID inside our campus.
We want to block our local users (both user...@concordia.ca
On Feb 15, 2013, at 14:24 , Linchuan Yang linchuan.y...@concordia.ca wrote:
Currently, we are using the same radius servers for both of SSID, and we
found that some of our local users login with eduroam SSID inside our campus.
What we are thinking about doing for local users who connect to
VLAN select feature is working good here on: 7.2.110.8, 7.4.100.0,
7.4.103.3 and now on 7.3.112.0. ;-)
just fyi, tried 7.4.100.0 and small issue with RRM, (running at low
signal strength) and with the 1142 model access points. Patch for the
RRM and all was great, seeing more 5GHz N
On Feb 15, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Linchuan Yang linchuan.y...@concordia.ca wrote:
Dear All
Do you use different radius servers for your local SSID and eduroam SSID?
Currently, we are using the same radius servers for both of SSID, and we
found that some of our local users login with
Linchuan,
There is a big drawback to no letting your users join the local eduroam SSID.
They won't be able to setup their devices while on campus before traveling.
Having the concordia.cahttp://concordia.ca users joining the eduroam SSID on
campus will help them with
two aspects of the
It's pretty common in Europe to only offer the eduroam ssid, and offer visitors
'different' connectivity than local users on it, (and have a captive portal
containing all the setup etc on an open ssid).
Making it so the wireless configuration is the same whether on campus or at
another eduroam
Hi,
It is an exceptionally bad idea to do what you're proposing, as it prevents
local users from verifying their eduroam configuration actually works at your
site before roaming to other sites.
Yes, you can display a test page, but then you have to make sure that every
user sets the priority
We have been using eduroam as our primary SSID since the fall. We could put non
@uiowa.edu users in a separate VLAN that appears outside our border, but the
acutual number of non iowa users on campus is so small that it wasn't deemed
worth the effort to setup and maintain.
Implementing
As Anders hinted, the mac hashing feature to solve dhcp exhaustion
introduced in 7.2 was backported to later versions of 7.0 code (7.0.220.0
perhaps). We're running vlan select happily on 5508s on 7.2 and WiSM-1s on
7.0 and it works well on both.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Hurt,Trenton
I've never tried it but ISC dhcp server at some point added a one lease
per client feature where the server terminates existing leases associated
with a given MAC when it assigns a new address. Infoblox in its most
recent release supports this but I've not tried it. Theoretically at least
if you
14 matches
Mail list logo
