: Friday, March 14, 2008 8:20 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 11n/WiMax
Hi Lee,
Before we went with 11n, we briefly looked at WiMax, and Frank was
right. In order to have 1000+ simultaneous clients, it would have taken
many towers which was a huge investment
10:44 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 11n/WiMax
Frank Bulk - iNAME wrote:
WiMAX is a MAN solution will generally offer lower throughput than
802.11n. It's generally not a good enterprise fit.
It sure does look interesting as a secondary/backup Internet
Frank Bulk wrote:
Guessing by the size of most institutions on this listserv, WiMAX at its
highest speed, 75 Mbps, would not be enough.
Oh, I don't know -- that's the size of our one-and-only link today!
--
Regards,
-- Cal Frye, Network Administrator, Oberlin College
www.calfrye.com,
WiMAX is a MAN solution will generally offer lower throughput than 802.11n.
It's generally not a good enterprise fit.
Frank
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 6:45 PM
To:
