On 19/4/20 4:08 am, Turner, Ryan H wrote:
>
> All,
>
>
>
> We think we resolved it. As others said before, it was the port we
> was wrong. As soon as we changed it to 1700, everything worked. The
> thing that has me scratching my head is why the Cisco WLC would be
> responding with properly
riday, April 17, 2020 1:28 PM
>> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
>> <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
>> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change
>> of Authorization)
>>
>> Here are some PCAPs for you folks.
>> htt
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Both of those worked. Both received ACKs from the WLC.
On Apr 17, 2020, at 11:38 AM, Turner, Ryan H
mailto:rhtur...@email.unc.edu>> wrote:
Thank you!. You are gettin
.
>
> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
> <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> on behalf of Turner, Ryan H
> mailto:rhtur...@email.unc.edu>>
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 10:01 AM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
>
.
Ryan
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Turner, Ryan H
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 1:38 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Thank you!. You are getting
Of Jake Snyder
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 1:28 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Here are some PCAPs for you folks.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/njdfxt9bfo89xte/AABmaJkT9W2h9RoAirdQ0GV8a?dl=0
One
Thank you!!
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Jake Snyder
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 1:28 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Here are some PCAPs
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Care to share a link to the doc?
On Apr 17, 2020, at 10:13 AM, Turner, Ryan H
mailto:rhtur...@email.unc.edu>> wrote:
I really think Felix hit the nail on the head. I found the documen
ss Issues Community Group Listserv
>> > <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>> On Behalf Of Curtis K. Larsen
>> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 12:03 PM
>> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
>> <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
>>
AUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
> On Behalf Of Curtis K. Larsen
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 12:03 PM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change
> of Authorization)
>
> We use 1700 as well
-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
We use 1700 as well for our CoA stuff against the Cisco 8540 with PacketFence.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
We use 1700 as well for our CoA stuff against the Cisco 8540 with PacketFence.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
on behalf of Turner, Ryan H
To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
So apparently that changed. If you search on Cisco, you will note that they
seemed to go away from the default port. I do not think we would
: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Abhiramms
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 11:25 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Ryan,
Have you tried UDP port 1700.
As far as I can
CAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change of
Authorization)
Ryan,
Have you tried UDP port 1700.
As far as I can remember, the default port when adding a radius client for a
cisco device was 1700.
Also - I usually refer to this link that has the d
if I can get
> it removed.
>
> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
> On Behalf Of Felix Windt
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 9:52 AM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC question regarding RFC3587 (Change
>
Thank you Felix. We do have this attribute present. Let me see if I can get
it removed.
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
On Behalf Of Felix Windt
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 9:52 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Advanced NAC
This is off the cuff, but in the past I’ve had issues with Cisco WLCs taking
CoAs when the Event-Timestamp attribute was present.
thx,
felix
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group Listserv
on behalf of "Turner, Ryan H"
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Community Group
18 matches
Mail list logo
