http://tinyurl.com/kny9a7
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Make sure you're not using a serial terminal to paste it in. The MT, perhaps
from lack of flow control doesn't take well to large amounts of text being
pasted in at high speed via serial. Paste things from ssh/telnet
As far as backing up hotspot, I make the hotspot files on the computer (easier
Hello all, I got an issue that I haven't delt with before.
note we HAVE done this scenario before just with diff radios and it worked.
The Setup..
we have a 3/4 mile long radio shot to one of our towers that we wanted to
increase bandwidth to as well as give it some redundancy. So
we bought 2
First off a signal strength of -28 or -30 is like someone screaming in your
face, kind of impolite. Someone mentioned in the recent past that a
customer with -55 needed to be toned down to B from G because of how close
they were and the link was significantly better. I wouldn't expect it's
part
Josh, my apologizes, I wasn't trying to be impolite, or a braggart, just
stating facts so that all relevant info is on the table.
Ryan
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.comwrote:
First off a signal strength of -28 or -30 is like someone screaming in your
I think the ubnt radios alter or do some funny magic with the mac addresses
when bridging. For a clear bridge, try using them in wds, which will of course
prevent adequate security.
I would also turn the power down a little, -28 will do more harm than good
especially if you're trying to put
Are the bullets in WDS mode, if not you will have proxy ARP for one direction
and not the other. This will really mess with routing/link protocols.
Fire up wireshark and post a short capture (starting before adding the links to
right after adding them).
If you add just one link or the other,
Ryan,
Let me say this differently. I'm not saying it's bad that your bragging,
I'm saying that the signal strength could be too high. If you put two
antennas adjacent and get a 0 or -1 signal strength you get significant
packet gain because the hardware can't keep up with the RF.
I suck at
Make sure all your ports at set in at the same ethernet link speed that
are running lacp. For testing does it work if you run RSTP instead?
jree...@18-30chat.net wrote:
Are the bullets in WDS mode, if not you will have proxy ARP for one direction
and not the other. This will really mess
Thank you for sharing, Rick!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth.
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:22 PM, RickG
I didn't have the radios is WDS mode, its works perfectly now. Although I
still can't get to the units after LACP is linked. Gota find a way around
that.
Ryan
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Bret Clark bcl...@spectraaccess.comwrote:
Make sure all your ports at set in at the same ethernet
Did you get what he was saying about the signal strength? You're going
to want your signal around -60 or so. I think anything above -50 really
causes noise problems. I had to go through and audit many units on our
network just because of the pollution is causes when several backhauls
and clients
Yea I got that, I've got both links now at -58 had to lower the power down
big time.
Ryan
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Andy Trimmell
atrimm...@precisionds.comwrote:
Did you get what he was saying about the signal strength? You're going
to want your signal around -60 or so. I think
As many have responded the signal is way too high. Also, I'm curious
if you have the Bullets in 'bridge mode' or 'route mode'?
-RickG
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Ryan Gheringrgher...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all, I got an issue that I haven't delt with before.
note we HAVE done this
Before - station mode (in other terms, bridge mode with arp proxy)
After - station wds mode (a real layer 2 bridge this time =)
Ubiquiti AirOS calls them station, station wds and router.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
When you
My repeater contact is simple.
If un-served-behind-the-big-rock-customer (USBTBR) wants service, they
need to talk to their neighbor about it. If they establish some sort
dialog, then the house-with-service-customer (HWSC) calls me to tell me
it is OK. I find that this makes it a
I think that Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. provides porting services Kathy.
-Original Message-
From: Kathy Tate [mailto:kt...@onlinenw.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 1:26 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] LNP Services
We are a WISP and a CLEC and have our own SS7
Anyone have a doc that describes basic wireless card troubleshooting for
users who have macs? We are staring to see more users with macs and our
support is not that familiar with these. Thanks for any help anyone may can
offer..
http://www.aerowire.net
Alan Long
Director of
Anyone have a suggestion for a dual ethernet port router, that can handle
30-50mb/s of traffic. I do not need it to do nat or anything like that, just
need it to route..I have looked at a cisco 2811..but know there are other
options..Thanks for any help.
http://www.aerowire.net
Mikrotik rb450 $99
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Alan Long
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:59 PM
To:
Now, you have no encryption.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:47:13PM -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
Before - station mode (in other terms, bridge mode with arp proxy)
After - station wds mode (a real layer 2 bridge this time =)
Ubiquiti AirOS calls them station, station wds and router.
Josh
Might as well go with the 450G for gigabit ports, more memory, etc.
Gino Villarini wrote:
Mikrotik rb450 $99
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Thanx Rick
Jim
RickG wrote:
Attached...RickG
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:39 PM, sa...@jeffcosoho.com
sa...@jeffcosoho.comwrote:
Anyone have a contract they could share for this?
Thanx
Jim
WISPA
If you are ONLY going to route, no NAT, firewall or other stuff, then a
Cisco 871 will do what you want. We have tested it at wirespeed.
John
Alan Long wrote:
Anyone have a suggestion for a dual ethernet port router, that can handle
30-50mb/s of traffic. I do not need it to do nat or
I've been putting in the 9 port (yeah I know it's more than you want but
that gives you more power and memory) MT units. They are AMAZING. So
far.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Alan Long alan.l...@aerowire.net
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, June
Excellent point - I have always said less is more
How's the County wifi project coming?
__
Jerry Richardson
airCloud Communications
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K.
All good points. I put a box complete with power and ethernet switch
on the outside of HWSC so I can control everything. I also try to stay
away from roof top mounts. I'd rather be on a grain silo, short
tower., or even a barn than track on someone's shingles.
-RickG
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:34
You're welcome! Use at your own risk. This was originally from a
lawyer approved tower agreement and edited to provide for a simple
contract for residential repeaters. They need simple! All that fine
print overwhelms them!
-RickG
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:00 PM,
28 matches
Mail list logo
