Thanks for all the responses. I have to give a big shout out to CTI
and Jeff Ehman.
I didn't end up ordering part from CTI this time but Jeff saw my
post and went out of his way to drive over a half hour to Pac's
warehouse. He flagged someone down through a window and checked on my
order stat
It's great to be a part of an industry where people pull together like this.
I'm proud to be a part of it. And proud of all of you!
Also, how's the guy that got hurt? Do they know how that's going to turn out
yet?
laters,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Brian Rohrbacher
To
Got it running! Sweet!
I would encourage anyone doing a fair amount of l2 tunneling either via
vlans or EOIP to take a look at BGP based VPLS
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
--
Details? :)
Randy
Gino Villarini wrote:
> Got it running! Sweet!
>
>
>
> I would encourage anyone doing a fair amount of l2 tunneling either via
> vlans or EOIP to take a look at BGP based VPLS
>
>
>
> Gino A. Villarini
> g...@aeronetpr.com
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> tel 787.27
On Oct 9, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> I didn't apply for two main reasons.
>
> 1: they want the whole company and don't tell you when (if ever)
> you'll get
> it back.
You can't sell the company without approval for 10 years. The general
terms of that approval were that you
Basically our test environment consist of 10 deployed routers on our
network
Ip connectivity is achieved by OSPF
We have setup a Router on our NOC as Route Reflector for BGP
All other 9 Routers have BGP sessions to the NOC
VLPS are created dynamically via iBGP
If we need a VPLS tunnel between
If you do 1/4 or 1/2 channels you have to create a scan list with the
frequencies you looking at using since you end up with so many more channels
that a normal scan would take very long time. Just add the frequencies in MHz
with a , between them in the scan list on the cpe.
/Eje
Sent via Blac
And then MT releases next ROS and it all breaks lol
No really, I love all of their products and use them all as well, but I
would not dare use the fairly new functionality you just deployed on your
network myself.
Aside from that, I'm into learning and making things better... Having said
tha
Straight from Mikrotik mouths EOIP is resource hungry, VLPS uses less
resources, Also EOIP its easy for a PTP, try a PTMP with 50 sites!
A no, traffic does not go trough our NOC, BGP on our NOC its only used
to advertise the MPLS Labels trough the Network. Traffic goes out via
established IP OSPF
You have it all wrong, and need to study MPLS. We have huge MPLS
implementations on MT backend. We have been using for the last 4 or 5
releases from MT, including their latest beta's and RC's.
It's MUCH faster and MUCH MUCH more efficient than EoIP. Again, study it,
MT has a MPLS Wiki page.
We
EoIP eats CPU for every meal and snacks. Disgustingly resource hungry.
On 10/10/09, Gino Villarini wrote:
> Straight from Mikrotik mouths EOIP is resource hungry, VLPS uses less
> resources, Also EOIP its easy for a PTP, try a PTMP with 50 sites!
>
> A no, traffic does not go trough our NOC, BGP
Nowadays what are your preferred MT version number ? routing or routing-test ?
Rubens
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Jayson Baker wrote:
> You have it all wrong, and need to study MPLS. We have huge MPLS
> implementations on MT backend. We have been using for the last 4 or 5
> releases fro
We are using 3.30 with routing-test and mpls-test
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Rubens Kuhl
Sent: Saturday,
3.30 w/ routing-test, mpls-test
or 4.0rc1
All run great.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> Nowadays what are your preferred MT version number ? routing or
> routing-test ?
>
>
> Rubens
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Jayson Baker
> wrote:
> > You have it all wrong, a
Pathing a ~43mile backhaul with little luck meeting the throughput
requirements. I'd buy whatever radio and antenna set could get me there - any
help would be greatly appreciated! Licensed link would be most desirable.
Offlist sales to sc...@velociter.net OK, thanks.
Sacramento (rooftop):
38
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Bartosch"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Barriers to WISP growth
>
> On Oct 9, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
>
>> I didn't apply for two main reasons.
>>
>> 1: they want the whole co
16 matches
Mail list logo
