No critical link should ever be standalone whether using expensive
equipment or using lower cost equipment. Always a good idea to put a
second redundant link in running something like RSTP or OSPF.
Gino Villarini wrote:
Whatever rocks your world!
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aero
We do as well. One of our MT links has more stability and reliability
than a neighboring Trango Apex link.
Regards,
Chuck
On Jan 30, 2010, at 11:38 PM, "Gino Villarini"
wrote:
> Not to sound like a jerk, but who would trust they're main backbone
> feed
> to a Mikrotik or Ubiquiti
>
>
V
Phil
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
> ha ha
>
>
> heres a test
>
> ... _ _ _ ...
>
> wonder how many folks are long time users and know that one real
> fast ;-)
>
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2010, at 9:53 PM, Robert West wrote:
>
> > Okay, I know it's a test but I'm not very good
Paper marked
You passed
Richard
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Sub
True. All our links are redundant and have multiple diverse paths.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
> No critical link should ever be standalone whether using expensive
> equipment or using lower cost equipment. Always a good idea to put a second
> redundant link in running so
To get started I would agree that the M-series can deliver 45 megs across the
street. A couple of Nano5M's would deliver bandwidth but then the pps comes
into play, so a Tik box to quiet things down a bit would be good.
-- Original Message --
From: "Rober
MT is not a replacement for an APEX, since the value of the APEX is LICENSED
spectrum.
But, I share Chuck's praise for MT. WISPs have been running reliable
backbones on unlicenced spectrum and MT successfully for years.
The new MT hardware and Firmwares are really nice and plenty reliable. For
You don’t say what the distance is, But if you have the height to
clear the road you could use a steel cable to support a fibre?
Richard
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
---
Wait until you see the next release of firmware for the Ubiquiti MIMO
equipment.
Built-in spectrum analyzer, 1x better than Mikrotik, and almost as good
as our $30k HP analyzer.
Runs on the unit itself, while it's installed, in place, connected to the
antenna.
Can even run while the radio is in
Stock Cisco omnis, we were hanging them from light poles.
John
RickG wrote:
> Which antenna did you use? -RickG
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:03 PM, John Thomas wrote:
>
>
>> We have mounted omnis upside down because an omni pattern tends to
>> radiate from the base of the antenna upward. By
Midnight overhead fiber run... :-)
John
Jeremie Chism wrote:
> I have a pop across the street from one of my towers. The phone
> company there is giving me a great deal on bandwidth but I have to get
> it across to the tower. Any recommendations for something reliable at
> that range.
>
>
I could not agree more!
_
Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com
Email: gl...@hostmedic.com
Pplease don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
On Jan 31, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Bret Clark wr
Most towns will allow this - however they may charge you a few fees.
1. Franchise Fee: This can be tricky. Some locales will request to know the
number of clients going through the link and then charge you a flat fee per
client. If you take a look at your catv bill (and others) you may not
I think you forgot the most expensive part. Insurance
-B-
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Kelley
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:28:18
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Short range backhaul
Most towns will allow this - however they may charg
And the lawyer write and/or review the agreement!
-RickG
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 3:38 PM, wrote:
> I think you forgot the most expensive part. Insurance
>
> -B-
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Glenn Kelley
> Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:28:18
> To
Same here. High price doesn't denote high quality. Besides, high price tag
items can blow up the same as lower priced ones.
MT and UBNT work just fine.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of George Morris
Sent: Satu
That would be SOS in morse. So there!
That's one I actually knew I had a strange childhood.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Glenn Kelley
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 1:43 AM
To: WISPA General List
S
Just not enough Ham operators on this list. The Hams would be pushing for
the cheapest way of doing links instead of all the licensed and high dollar
crapola.
Some Hams could figure out how to run 300mb over a 20 mile link using parts
from 8 track tape players and a jar of pickle juice, stuffed
Some of the HAMS are like that. Very few though. Most are
appliance operators now.
Of course, then you find the ones that will set up a link like that,
putting out a spur right on the input of the local public safety
repeater.
Don't take your organs to heaven,
heaven knows we need them do
Thanks for all the input. It is greatly appreciated.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
> From: RickG
> Date: January 31, 2010 4:02:20 PM CST
> To: lakel...@gbcx.net, WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Short range backhaul
> Reply-To: WISPA General List
>
> And the lawyer
For about the past two weeks, we've been having problems setting up or
Canopy 900 MHz SM units. It's really odd. For example, today I went out to
do site surveys. When I connected to my survey radio and it seemed fine at
first. I have the page set to refresh every three seconds for doing site
s
First guess...you have NAT and DHCP enabled and when the radio reboots
your PC gives up on DHCP (because the SM is rebooting).
On 1/31/10, David Hannum wrote:
> For about the past two weeks, we've been having problems setting up or
> Canopy 900 MHz SM units. It's really odd. For example, today
Agreed as well, I wasn't trying to say that the Apex wasn't as good as
the MT. My point was that at some point different backhauls have their
issues and I wasn't trying to say that they are better or worse, just
that a $10k link from them doesn't necessarily mean more stability.
Regards,
Chuck Ho
This happens even with our radio that we do site surveys with. Everything
on that is default except Region, Frequency and Color Code. No NAT or DHCP.
Dave
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> First guess...you have NAT and DHCP enabled and when the radio reboots
> your PC giv
Maybe not strange, but happy:
http://www.happychild.org.uk/ifs/3mrs.htm
This wouldve been nice as a child:
http://www.javascriptkit.com/script/script2/morse.shtml
This is kinda funny:
http://www.zianet.com/sparks/coder.html
-RickG
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Robert West wrote:
> That
What is faster morse code or cell phone texting...
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoID=2025791
097
Yeah... Kids today got things to learn
;)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Rigged. There is no Blackberry keyboard - just that awful 12-key
thing (not t9 autofill, but a total of 12 keys).
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.
In the speed texting championships you are not allowed any spellaids or
predictive text program.
The fastest texters all recorded their speed texting on 12 key phones.
I could see allowing a competition between a qwerty keyboard and morse. But
spellaids and predictive text programs wouldn't be fa
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 05:38:06PM -0500, Robert West wrote:
> Just not enough Ham operators on this list. The Hams would be pushing for
> the cheapest way of doing links instead of all the licensed and high dollar
> crapola.
Don't say cheap. It's simply more cost effective. Labor is free, af
I have 26 letters on 26 keys on my phone.
I'd have to imagine 1 key/letter being easier then 2-4 depresses/letter.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts
ROFL - pickle juice has horrible RF properties... that is awesome!
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wirele
I tried to learn semaphore as a kid but I just couldn't get it. So here I
was, out with my friend Timmy exploring the woods and he goes and falls into
a well. I had the flags and I just couldn't remember the positions to
signal the rangers that we needed help for Timmy who fell into the well. So
We've gone backwards. The next phone to come out will have smoke signals.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 8:40 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] test
What i
I stand corrected.
:)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Lambert
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 9:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Short range backhaul
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 05:38:06PM -0500, Rob
Jayson,
If that turns out to be the case, it would of course be very exciting for
the industry.
But, so far, both Ubiquiti and Atheros had been silent about this topic.
Our (unofficial and non-expert) investigation inferred that Atheros chipset
AR9220 series (Mikrotik) has Spectrum analyzer sup
That I agree with. But not a favor of RSTP for Wireless redundancy. Both
PRimary and Secondary link need to be able to be monitored in real time,
otherwise you cant guarantee the secondary link will be working when the
first one fails. Often to prevent bridgeloop, one link has to be turned
dow
36 matches
Mail list logo
