[WISPA] Wimax 2.5 4.9 Ghz?

2011-05-12 Thread Gino Villarini
Working on a RUS funded RFP, need a 802.16e 2.5 4.9 system, who are the current players? Aperto, Alvarion, Airspan? Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. 787.273.4143

Re: [WISPA] Wimax 2.5 4.9 Ghz?

2011-05-12 Thread Blake Covarrubias
In 2.5: Motorola, Huawei, PureWave, ZTE, Gemtek -- Blake Covarrubias On May 12, 2011, at 9:49, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote: Working on a RUS funded RFP, need a 802.16e 2.5 4.9 system, who are the current players? Aperto, Alvarion, Airspan? Gino A. Villarini

Re: [WISPA] Wimax 2.5 4.9 Ghz?

2011-05-12 Thread Ryan Spott
Tranzeo has a 2.5 that just went through OET last November. Perhaps they have something that scales like Aperto? https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/ViewExhibitReport.cfm?mode=ExhibitsRequestTimeout=500calledFromFrame=Napplication_id=182519fcc_id=%27QRF-PVE25XBY%27 For some reason IE9

Re: [WISPA] Wimax 2.5 4.9 Ghz?

2011-05-12 Thread Rubens Kuhl
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote: Working on a RUS funded RFP, need a 802.16e 2.5 4.9 system, who are the current players? Redline Communications has a few new series named RDL-, and some of them support 4.9. 2.5 is a band they long ago decided not

Re: [WISPA] Allot 202

2011-05-12 Thread Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe,
I have an Allot 202 that I reset to factory default and it asks for an activation key. As soon as I click on configuration the cursor changes to a circle. Everything else works except the configuration tab. Anyone have a solution? Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe 234(0)8023258027

Re: [WISPA] Cogent vs. Hurricane

2011-05-12 Thread Tom DeReggi
I'd vote: Hurricane... Because... 1) Hurricane is better/easier to work with for the WISP provider, from the accounting/management side. (Customers probably wont be able to tell the difference) 2) Hurricaine is better prepared for the future with IPv6. 3) Cogent is more likely to compete

[WISPA] TrangoLink45 Question

2011-05-12 Thread Scott Reed
Does anyone here know what the follow errors really mean, what the impact may be on the link and how to fix them: 54 1:01:59:09.752 1467 [ERR] batchdV2.c 936: Fail to snmpset adjusted power 16 55 1:02:03:32.741 1471 [ERR] batchdV2.c 936: Fail to snmpset adjusted power 16 56 1:02:04:48.134

[WISPA] FCC477 fines?

2011-05-12 Thread Cameron Crum
One of our customers got a call today from the FCC. The FCC representative on the other end told him that he had missed the deadline for filing his 477 form and that this was a courtesy call. If he did not get his filing in soon, he would be subject to a fine. Well it was easy enough to rectify

Re: [WISPA] FCC477 fines?

2011-05-12 Thread Brian Webster
I believe it has been that way all along, they just never enforced it. Thank You, Brian Webster http://www.wirelessmapping.com www.wirelessmapping.com www.Broadband-Mapping.com From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Cameron Crum Sent: Friday,