tower leg part numbers are marked: 8807379-1 880380-1 880382-1 881569-1
NO pics yet
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> No pictures
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
Just to follow up on this. I'm working on a network at the moment,
diagnosing port issues on the Netonix. We had some bad crimps (I'm 6000
miles away) and we've been seeing some CRC errors and intermittent
connection loss on AF5x links. Pretty sure it's the ethernet connections
and finally
Microbursts causing buffer drops on egress ports to non-10G capable
destinations. The switch wants to send data at a rate faster than the 1G
devices can take it in, so it has to buffer it's data on those ports.
Eventually those buffers fill up, and it taildrops traffic. TCP flow
control takes over
So you're saying, make sure Flow Control is enabled on the ports?
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> Microbursts causing buffer drops on egress ports to non-10G capable
> destinations. The switch wants to send data at a rate faster than the 1G
> devices
Negative, layer2 flow control is an axe when you need a scalpel. Turn it
off everywhere!
Layer3 has automatic mechanisms to help handle bandwidth saturation, and
packet loss is part of that process. Furthermore, proper ToS/DSCP queueing
is equally important.
On Nov 7, 2016 9:36 AM, "Judd Dare"
I've recently been looking at arista switches to do something similar.
Wonder how they would act?
On Nov 7, 2016 8:58 AM, "TJ Trout" wrote:
> I have a 10G switch that is switching everything of mine at my NOC,
> including peers, router wan, router lan, uplink to tower, etc
>
>
On 11/7/2016 10:40 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Negative, layer2 flow control is an axe when you need a scalpel. Turn
it off everywhere!
Layer3 has automatic mechanisms to help handle bandwidth saturation,
and packet loss is part of that process. Furthermore, proper ToS/DSCP
queueing is
I have a 10G switch that is switching everything of mine at my NOC,
including peers, router wan, router lan, uplink to tower, etc
During peak traffic periods ~2gbps I'm seeing 1% packet loss and throughput
will drop to 0 for just a second and resume normal for a few minutes before
dropping back
I have a 10G switch that is switching everything of mine at my NOC,
including peers, router wan, router lan, uplink to tower, etc
During peak traffic periods ~2gbps I'm seeing 1% packet loss and throughput
will drop to 0 for just a second and resume normal for a few minutes before
dropping back
I just forwarded to my contact in Wichita. Will let you know what he comes
back with.
-Zach
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Mike Francis
wrote:
> Can anyone service this location?
>
> 1855 Innovation Blvd Wichita Ks 67260
>
> Thank you,
> --
> John Michael Francis
Sorry, correction layer 4. TCP slow start and window sizing.
Allowing l2 to control your drops in a willy nilly fashion though is not a
good idea... And random "pauses" on your backbone is also a poor idea.
I'm of the opinion that WISP networks likely need to move to deep buffer
data center
Not an expert at this level of switching, but my understanding, as your
suggesting is to enable Flow Control on the ports, possibly more on the 1G
ports because they are the bottle neck. If the 10G port is receiving full
speed and passing on to a 1G port which can't pass fast enough, then the
On 11/7/2016 11:05 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Sorry, correction layer 4. TCP slow start and window sizing.
Allowing l2 to control your drops in a willy nilly fashion though is
not a good idea... And random "pauses" on your backbone is also a poor
idea.
The idea is to smooth out the flow end
Yes, if you like various ms pauses of your backbone then enable flow
control.
I hope you don't run VoIP or have gamer customers! ;)
On Nov 7, 2016 10:19 AM, "Judd Dare" wrote:
> Not an expert at this level of switching, but my understanding, as your
> suggesting is to
I would agree, but sadly WISP networks are full of 100Mbps links AND a ton
of variable bandwidth ptp and ptmp links.
You will have to buffer to have any kind of meaningful throughput,
otherwise Bandwidth Delay Product calculations will drive your throughout
into the dirt.
Buffer BLOAT is bad.
In addition, imagine the following scenario:
8 port switch at a tower. Gigabit Ethernet port. 7 ports on the switch, all
have 100Mbps links to APs.
Buffer architecture is a shared memory design, with say 4MB available.
Do the math. The buffer on that switch is going to fill up very quickly,
So, a bit of back story on this...
It's kind of "my fault" that the AF line has flow control :P
At Performant Networks we decided to do some RFC2544 testing of AirFibers
(with Chuck watching via a Sykpe call). Turns out they didn't like that too
much. Once they added flow control, there was much
Can anyone service this location?
1855 Innovation Blvd Wichita Ks 67260
Thank you,
--
John Michael Francis II
JMF Solutions, Inc
Wavefly - Internet Voip Cloud
INC 5000 #2593
CRN Fast Growth #105
251-517-5069
http://jmfsolutions.net
http://wavefly.com
"People are unreasonable, illogical, and
No pictures
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Marco Coelho wrote:
>
> I'm looking at a tower (self supporter) which mechanically looks like one
> of my Rohn SSV towers. There is
I'm looking at a tower (self supporter) which mechanically looks like one
of my Rohn SSV towers. There is not a tower part number plate on the
tower, but the legs are marked:
880379-1
880380-1
880381-1
880382-1
881569-1
Ideas?
--
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville,
20 matches
Mail list logo