Re: [WISPA] ...from the FCC (reinforces what I was just saying in the TV whitespace thread)

2007-02-06 Thread John Scrivner
Patrick, We have an ex-FCC guy telling people NOT to file form 477? What is going on? Why would this guy be saying such things? Can you give us some background on this guy and why he is doing this? Scriv As I was saying, the FCC is getting a bit edgy about WISPs deciding for themselves what r

Re: [WISPA] ...from the FCC (reinforces what I was just saying in the TV whitespace thread)

2007-02-06 Thread Dawn DiPietro
Patrick, If I am not mistaken I think you meant Robert Pepper. Please correct me if I am wrong. It has been known to happen once or twice. ;-) Regards, Dawn DiPietro George Rogato wrote: Patrick Leary wrote: because former FCC policy chief, Robert Canary (now with Cisco), has been posti

Re: [WISPA] ...from the FCC (reinforces what I was just saying in the TV whitespace thread)

2007-02-06 Thread George Rogato
Patrick Leary wrote: because former FCC policy chief, Robert Canary (now with Cisco), has been posting on the isp-wireless list that WISPs are not obligated to file Form 477. You sure? I thought Robert Canary was a long time wisp? -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubs

[WISPA] ...from the FCC (reinforces what I was just saying in the TV whitespace thread)

2007-02-06 Thread Patrick Leary
As I was saying, the FCC is getting a bit edgy about WISPs deciding for themselves what rules are important. I believe they were set off in this case (or made to respond) because former FCC policy chief, Robert Canary (now with Cisco), has been posting on the isp-wireless list that WISPs are not ob