PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
Freeside is the new interface.
I only use Mikrotik devices (including CPE, which are the customer's
router).
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent
Yes you can
Jory Privett
WCCS
- Original Message -
From: Cameron Kilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
I want to you use Freeside badly for a while now
Sweet, baby steps.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jory Privett
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
Yes you can
Jory Privett
WCCS
- Original Message
]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
I want to you use Freeside badly for a while now, but the Billing
Manager is nervous transferring data? Does anybody know if you can set a
single billing day within Freeside
address.
Cameron
Midcoast Internet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chuck McCown - 2
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
If you have ever renumbered your entire
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
PPPoE
Y'know, I've never understood why many ISPs are so fond of PPPOE. The only
benefits anyone has ever articulated to me are an alleged improvement in
ease of tracking customer-IP
struggle as well as Apple Airports.
-Cameron
Midcoast Internet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:30 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
It has similar ease
Mike Hammett wrote:
[ on the benefits of PPPoE ]
It has similar ease of address distribution as DHCP, but also carries rate
limiting information as well. I'm switching to having the PPPoE backed by
RADIUS, so my new management system will be a web interface where I can
change anything
Eugene, OR 97401
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
http://www.unwiredwest.com
- Original Message -
From: Cameron Kilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
We use a mix. Everybody
bill for time spent fixing my customers home networks.
ryan
-Original Message-
From: Mark Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:43 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
We have always given a public IP address
- Original Message -
From: David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
Mike Hammett wrote:
[ on the benefits of PPPoE ]
It has similar ease of address distribution as DHCP
@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
What are you using for web interface. We are using radius for our PPPoE.
One of the problems we have noticed with PPPoE using MikroTik to pass
the data to the radius server is some routers have
Just curious to NAT or not to NAT,
We have been operating with NATed addresses out to our customers on a
10.x.x.x private network, the trouble is more and more customers are
wanting to use services that require a public IP, such as remote
security camera monitoring, etc... we currently have
Patrick Nix Jr. wrote:
We have been operating with NATed addresses out to our customers on a
10.x.x.x private network, the trouble is more and more customers are
wanting to use services that require a public IP, such as remote
security camera monitoring, etc... we currently have been offering
We have always offered a single public IP address to every customer
(dial-up, DSL, wireless, fiber, etc.) and then we charge $5/mo for each
extra IP.
It makes life SO much easier to track down customers when law
enforcement comes with a subpeona, because the customer's IP never changes.
We
14, 2008 4:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
We have always offered a single public IP address to every customer
(dial-up, DSL, wireless, fiber, etc.) and then we charge $5/mo for each
extra IP.
It makes life SO much easier to track down customers
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:31 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
Agreed. There is no good reason not to give one public IP to each
client.
There are many reasons why it is a bad idea to NAT clients behind
private
IPs.
Best,
Brad
-Original
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
So then, static or DHCP'd
__
Patrick Nix, Jr.,
csweb.net
(800) 638-2614
http://www.csweb.net
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
PPPoE
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Nix Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
So
Patrick Nix Jr. wrote:
So then, static or DHCP'd
We use DHCP for everyone, then hard code it in the dhcp config file
for those who want to get the same one each time (i.e. static IP).
As long as you can track who has what and when, it doesn't really
matter. You'll need to know when the feds
PPPoE
Y'know, I've never understood why many ISPs are so fond of PPPOE. The only
benefits anyone has ever articulated to me are an alleged improvement in
ease of tracking customer-IP associations, and your DHCP server and tower
logs should take care of that for you just as easily. In the
And to take it one step further, I've never understood using DHCP for
customers. It makes it 10x easier for a rogue client to get on your
network if you run DHCP instead of just static. You don't have to
maintain any logs, or worry about your DHCP server having problems,
etc. It seems one step
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
And to take it one step further, I've never understood using DHCP for
customers. It makes it 10x easier for a rogue client to get on your network if
you run DHCP instead of just static. You don't have to maintain any logs, or
worry about your
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
If you have ever renumbered your entire network due to changing upstream
providers or running out of IP, you will wish you had used DHCP everywhere.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; WISPA
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:04 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
I think it's fair to say that any ISP of size has in fact done this once
if not twice. It's not the end of the world unless
Travis Johnson wrote:
And to take it one step further, I've never understood using DHCP for
customers. It makes it 10x easier for a rogue client to get on your
network if you run DHCP instead of just static. You don't have to
maintain any logs, or worry about your DHCP server having
concerning IP Schema
And to take it one step further, I've never understood using DHCP for
customers. It makes it 10x easier for a rogue client to get on your network
if you run DHCP instead of just static. You don't have to maintain any logs,
or worry about your DHCP server having
. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 2:19 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
Just curious to NAT or not to NAT,
We have been operating with NATed addresses out to our customers on a
10.x.x.x private network, the trouble is more and more
28 matches
Mail list logo
