Re: [WISPA] For George - just because you were thinking of me.
I wonder if they know what the word "multicast" measn... John >-Original Message- >From: Sam Tetherow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 08:19 AM >To: 'WISPA General List' >Subject: Re: [WISPA] For George - just because you were thinking of me. > >Even worse than the Friday night phenomenon is say Saturdays in the >fall. Layne Sisk had some pretty nasty things to say about the IPTV >solution used in Utah on football saturdays and how the usage would >honestly bring the fiber ring to it knees. > >Sam Tetherow >Sandhills Wireless > >Dawn DiPietro wrote: >> All, >> >> Below is Ken's latest Blog post, still a work in progress, since >> George brought it up he felt it was appropriate. >> >> Regards, >> Dawn DiPietro >> >> According to the A.C. Nielsen Co., the average American watches more than >> 4 hours of TV each day. >> http://www.csun.edu/science/health/docs/tv&health.html >> >> Now, I would be the first to admit that there is an unknown percentage of >> time that the TV is on but not being watched in any given family but even >> if we assume that percentage is close to 50% (which I would guess is >> high) >> we can see that from the estimated five minutes per day the average >> American spent watching internet video (according to the comScore study) >> we could very well see a jump of some nearly 50 times that amount once a >> full palette of subject matter is presented on the Internet for >> viewing on >> demand. >> http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1264 >> >> And which of society's groups of will be eager to take advantage of free >> Video On Demand? Why the people who can't afford to pay for these high >> dollar services or would prefer not to. >> >> The next question is, what kind of bandwidth will it take to deliver VoD >> per user? Let me qualify this question by laying some of the assumptions >> that will need to be addressed in this answer. >> >> First off, on the average Friday night, at 6:00PM, more than 50% of >> American households have more than one TV set on (read as more than one >> continuous video stream playing) and I would suggest this trend will >> continue, if not increase as the net-centric services improve. >> >> Secondly, if we are talking about IPTV bandwidth needs, we need to >> forecast that a 1.25Mbps sustained stream is necessary for one stream. If >> we move into the realm of high definition we are now looking at a rate of >> 14Mbps (uncompressed) with perhaps a chance of delivering reasonable >> quality using a 4Mbps sustained stream - per video is use. That does not >> take into account any bandwidth for telephone or Internet access, should >> these services be required. >> >> What we can see is that any network that is only capable of delivering >> sub >> 1Mbps speeds (as measured in real throughput) is now obsolete - we simply >> refuse to admit it yet. >> >> Of course, we can still continue to bury our heads in the sand and wait >> for the inevitable crisis. >> >> >> > >-- >WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] For George - just because you were thinking of me.
Now Marlon, that's not why we ALL insult you ;) Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Marlon K. Schafer wrote: sigh having no viable options vs. having one's head buried in the sand are two totally different things. Boy I'm getting tired of being insulted for having a successful business! marlon - Original Message - From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 5:08 PM Subject: [WISPA] For George - just because you were thinking of me. All, Below is Ken's latest Blog post, still a work in progress, since George brought it up he felt it was appropriate. Regards, Dawn DiPietro According to the A.C. Nielsen Co., the average American watches more than 4 hours of TV each day. http://www.csun.edu/science/health/docs/tv&health.html Now, I would be the first to admit that there is an unknown percentage of time that the TV is on but not being watched in any given family but even if we assume that percentage is close to 50% (which I would guess is high) we can see that from the estimated five minutes per day the average American spent watching internet video (according to the comScore study) we could very well see a jump of some nearly 50 times that amount once a full palette of subject matter is presented on the Internet for viewing on demand. http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1264 And which of society's groups of will be eager to take advantage of free Video On Demand? Why the people who can't afford to pay for these high dollar services or would prefer not to. The next question is, what kind of bandwidth will it take to deliver VoD per user? Let me qualify this question by laying some of the assumptions that will need to be addressed in this answer. First off, on the average Friday night, at 6:00PM, more than 50% of American households have more than one TV set on (read as more than one continuous video stream playing) and I would suggest this trend will continue, if not increase as the net-centric services improve. Secondly, if we are talking about IPTV bandwidth needs, we need to forecast that a 1.25Mbps sustained stream is necessary for one stream. If we move into the realm of high definition we are now looking at a rate of 14Mbps (uncompressed) with perhaps a chance of delivering reasonable quality using a 4Mbps sustained stream - per video is use. That does not take into account any bandwidth for telephone or Internet access, should these services be required. What we can see is that any network that is only capable of delivering sub 1Mbps speeds (as measured in real throughput) is now obsolete - we simply refuse to admit it yet. Of course, we can still continue to bury our heads in the sand and wait for the inevitable crisis. -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] For George - just because you were thinking of me.
Even worse than the Friday night phenomenon is say Saturdays in the fall. Layne Sisk had some pretty nasty things to say about the IPTV solution used in Utah on football saturdays and how the usage would honestly bring the fiber ring to it knees. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Dawn DiPietro wrote: All, Below is Ken's latest Blog post, still a work in progress, since George brought it up he felt it was appropriate. Regards, Dawn DiPietro According to the A.C. Nielsen Co., the average American watches more than 4 hours of TV each day. http://www.csun.edu/science/health/docs/tv&health.html Now, I would be the first to admit that there is an unknown percentage of time that the TV is on but not being watched in any given family but even if we assume that percentage is close to 50% (which I would guess is high) we can see that from the estimated five minutes per day the average American spent watching internet video (according to the comScore study) we could very well see a jump of some nearly 50 times that amount once a full palette of subject matter is presented on the Internet for viewing on demand. http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1264 And which of society's groups of will be eager to take advantage of free Video On Demand? Why the people who can't afford to pay for these high dollar services or would prefer not to. The next question is, what kind of bandwidth will it take to deliver VoD per user? Let me qualify this question by laying some of the assumptions that will need to be addressed in this answer. First off, on the average Friday night, at 6:00PM, more than 50% of American households have more than one TV set on (read as more than one continuous video stream playing) and I would suggest this trend will continue, if not increase as the net-centric services improve. Secondly, if we are talking about IPTV bandwidth needs, we need to forecast that a 1.25Mbps sustained stream is necessary for one stream. If we move into the realm of high definition we are now looking at a rate of 14Mbps (uncompressed) with perhaps a chance of delivering reasonable quality using a 4Mbps sustained stream - per video is use. That does not take into account any bandwidth for telephone or Internet access, should these services be required. What we can see is that any network that is only capable of delivering sub 1Mbps speeds (as measured in real throughput) is now obsolete - we simply refuse to admit it yet. Of course, we can still continue to bury our heads in the sand and wait for the inevitable crisis. -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] For George - just because you were thinking of me.
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:08:56 -0400, Dawn DiPietro wrote > All, > > And which of society's groups of will be eager to take advantage of free > Video On Demand? Why the people who can't afford to pay for these > high dollar services or would prefer not to. > > The next question is, what kind of bandwidth will it take to deliver > VoD per user? Let me qualify this question by laying some of the assumptions > that will need to be addressed in this answer. > > First off, on the average Friday night, at 6:00PM, more than 50% of > American households have more than one TV set on (read as more than one > continuous video stream playing) and I would suggest this trend will > continue, if not increase as the net-centric services improve. > > Secondly, if we are talking about IPTV bandwidth needs, we need to > forecast that a 1.25Mbps sustained stream is necessary for one > stream. If we move into the realm of high definition we are now > looking at a rate of 14Mbps (uncompressed) with perhaps a chance of > delivering reasonable quality using a 4Mbps sustained stream - per > video is use. That does not take into account any bandwidth for > telephone or Internet access, should these services be required. > > What we can see is that any network that is only capable of > delivering sub 1Mbps speeds (as measured in real throughput) is now > obsolete - we simply refuse to admit it yet. > > Of course, we can still continue to bury our heads in the sand and wait > for the inevitable crisis. I'm sorta puzzled by this claim of "crisis". I can't think of any...and I mean... ANY provider, who can support simultaneous and sustained 1+Mbit to more than half of thier customer base. Cable can't. The telco's really don't have that much bandwidth to their CO's. The backbone companies haven't got anywhere NEAR enough capacity to manage that. Now, if I could cache and redistribute using some kind of proxy mechanism, I could do it if the great majority of the traffic were streaming data from common sources. But scaling would be... well...quite a challenge. It would require that all my clients would be restricted to only a few sources for all of the streaming data. While I can see Ken's point, I believe he's very much wrong in his analysis of the state of the both the technology and the competition. I know I'm not ready for VOIP AND VOD to half my customers at the same time. But then neither is any of my competition. I guess the question is... If it jumps up on us, who can restructure faster? > > -- > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ Mark Koskenmaki <> Neofast, Inc Broadband for the Walla Walla Valley and Blue Mountains 541-969-8200 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] For George - just because you were thinking of me.
sigh having no viable options vs. having one's head buried in the sand are two totally different things. Boy I'm getting tired of being insulted for having a successful business! marlon - Original Message - From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 5:08 PM Subject: [WISPA] For George - just because you were thinking of me. All, Below is Ken's latest Blog post, still a work in progress, since George brought it up he felt it was appropriate. Regards, Dawn DiPietro According to the A.C. Nielsen Co., the average American watches more than 4 hours of TV each day. http://www.csun.edu/science/health/docs/tv&health.html Now, I would be the first to admit that there is an unknown percentage of time that the TV is on but not being watched in any given family but even if we assume that percentage is close to 50% (which I would guess is high) we can see that from the estimated five minutes per day the average American spent watching internet video (according to the comScore study) we could very well see a jump of some nearly 50 times that amount once a full palette of subject matter is presented on the Internet for viewing on demand. http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1264 And which of society's groups of will be eager to take advantage of free Video On Demand? Why the people who can't afford to pay for these high dollar services or would prefer not to. The next question is, what kind of bandwidth will it take to deliver VoD per user? Let me qualify this question by laying some of the assumptions that will need to be addressed in this answer. First off, on the average Friday night, at 6:00PM, more than 50% of American households have more than one TV set on (read as more than one continuous video stream playing) and I would suggest this trend will continue, if not increase as the net-centric services improve. Secondly, if we are talking about IPTV bandwidth needs, we need to forecast that a 1.25Mbps sustained stream is necessary for one stream. If we move into the realm of high definition we are now looking at a rate of 14Mbps (uncompressed) with perhaps a chance of delivering reasonable quality using a 4Mbps sustained stream - per video is use. That does not take into account any bandwidth for telephone or Internet access, should these services be required. What we can see is that any network that is only capable of delivering sub 1Mbps speeds (as measured in real throughput) is now obsolete - we simply refuse to admit it yet. Of course, we can still continue to bury our heads in the sand and wait for the inevitable crisis. -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
