Look at a difference in rssi levels at each end. I've seen some of the
radios (xr2 and xr5 cards) go weak either on the tx or rx side. That's a
hard one to catch.
Also if it's only 2.4 miles you might have to much power going to them
and picking up some multipath. Try dropping the power
Ubiquiti web test = udp and Mikrotik = udp or tcp so which are you using
on the Mikrotik side udp or tcp?IF you are using tcp on the Mikrotik
test, most likely you have a lot of packet loss and the tcp is spending
a lot of time in retransmission. If it's udp vs. udp then start
checking your
At daybreak. Already have a climber scheduled in case it is at the top
(265')
On 4/7/2014 10:05 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
Check the cable and hard set the interfaces if you can.
Cheers,
Mike
On Apr 7, 2014, at 6:52 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
Oops, look at the right stuff.
Web on UBNT, WinBox on MT
On 4/7/2014 11:36 PM, Robert wrote:
I didn't think the shell based speedtest would give those numbers
without limiting out the cpu. Were you using the web based speed test?
On 04/07/2014 06:37 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
I have a link using 2 PowerBridges that is about
Web on UBNT is a UDP test.. Apples and oranges As the shell
based tcp test on UBNT hits processor limits very fast, it's better
switching the MT test to UDP to get a better comparison.
Best,
Robert
On 04/08/2014 03:07 AM, Scott Reed wrote:
Web on UBNT, WinBox on MT
On
How do the interfaces look? Are they negotiating to 100/full on all
sides? Any interface errors accruing on any of the devices?
On Apr 7, 2014, at 6:38 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
I have a link using 2 PowerBridges that is about 2.4 miles. I can get
56M TCP across the link using
All are 100/full
No errors
On 4/7/2014 9:42 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
How do the interfaces look? Are they negotiating to 100/full on all
sides? Any interface errors accruing on any of the devices?
On Apr 7, 2014, at 6:38 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
I have a link using 2
Oops, look at the right stuff. 760,000,000 tx errors in 79 days on the
wire from the RouterMaxx to the PowerBridge.
Guess I know where the problem may be.
On 4/7/2014 9:49 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
All are 100/full
No errors
On 4/7/2014 9:42 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
How do the interfaces look? Are
Check the cable and hard set the interfaces if you can.
Cheers,
Mike
On Apr 7, 2014, at 6:52 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
Oops, look at the right stuff. 760,000,000 tx errors in 79 days on the
wire from the RouterMaxx to the PowerBridge.
Guess I know where the problem may be.
I didn't think the shell based speedtest would give those numbers
without limiting out the cpu. Were you using the web based speed test?
On 04/07/2014 06:37 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
I have a link using 2 PowerBridges that is about 2.4 miles. I can get
56M TCP across the link using the UBNT
What version firmware on the RouterMaxx?
On 04/07/2014 06:52 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
Oops, look at the right stuff. 760,000,000 tx errors in 79 days on the
wire from the RouterMaxx to the PowerBridge.
Guess I know where the problem may be.
On 4/7/2014 9:49 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
All are
11 matches
Mail list logo
