All I can say is
1) With Contracts at $5 million dollars per state, and multiple states,
Connected NAtions sure as heck should have skilled staff and reliable flexible
methods, with that much money thown at it. No disrespect meant, just stating,
thats a lot of money.
2) Its good to hear
Talk to Brian Webster. He is a subcontractor for the Illinois mapping
effort.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 8/3/2011 8:54 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
So, like many of you, we're being asked to provide data to NTIA for
broadband mapping, but as a
I have no problem providing them with my coverage maps, but when I gave
some of the requested data to Indiana, their maps were not so accurate.
At least Indiana allows us to provide maps rather than all the data.
On 8/3/2011 9:54 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
So, like many of you, we're being asked
I still don't understand why someone *wouldn't* be open to this. If the NTIA is
asking for your info, and granted none of it is that confidential (especially
if you use unlicensed), it is so they know where access is and isn't. When the
maps are drawn and your info wasn't supplied, there will
At 8/3/2011 09:54 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
So, like many of you, we're being asked to provide data to NTIA for
broadband mapping, but as a private company I'm rather bothered by the
confidential information they are asking for. They want to know such
things as our spectrum use, antenna locations,
On 08/03/2011 10:51 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
But they could go ahead with
something like this (letter of the law notwtihstanding, since law no
loger counts for much here) and thus having your maps submitted by
the deadline may prevent you from being run out of town by a subsidy whore.
Well,
They don't need the how we do it part. Model numbers of equipment,
etc., just are not necessary for what they are trying to accomplish.
Neither are frequency bands, etc. What they need is coverage data,
which I agree is important to provide, but no one else needs to know how
I provide it.
