Re: [WISPA] Tele-Health Grants

2007-02-06 Thread Peter R.
Certainly, licensed wireless links and managed firewall delivered by 
your team would be cheaper to deliver; faster to deploy; and just as 
reliable as fiber?


Regards,

Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc.


John Scrivner wrote:

I am afraid they will just build fiber business plans and not give 
wireless a second thought. Why should they consider wireless if they 
can get fiber for virtually free? Like I said...Gr.

Scriv


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Tele-Health Grants

2007-02-06 Thread George Rogato
I believe you John that they are scared of wireless and are shunning 
wireless.


But I can't help but think that every hospital I go in has lots of wireless.
I was up in Oregon Health Sciences and they must have had a cisco ap 
every 30' of cieling space.




John Scrivner wrote:
As I have stated before, the health care providers in this area have it 
in their minds (and their policy manuals) that wireless of any kind will 
not be suitable for their needs, period. It has nothing to do with 
technical reality. It has to do with perception and corporate policy. 
Basically health care interests here are not just saying no, they are 
saying hell no. It is a hard sell for me at this point and the only 
vendor who has supplied me with any backup is one I do not even buy 
from, Bridgewave. They sent me technical DOCs, testimonials, etc. from 
health care interests. I passed it along to the health care providers in 
this area and you could hear crickets, right before the next hell no. 
This is frustrating to say the least. If Alvarion or anyone else wants 
to help me I am sure I would take the help. It is in all your best 
interests since I am not the only wireless provider effected by this 
black-balling of our industry by health care interests in my region.

Scriv






--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Tele-Health Grants

2007-02-06 Thread Carl A jeptha

Hi John,
Just a thought, go and dig up all the horror stories about the back hoe 
operators that dig up lines and truck drivers that run over poles. And 
send that to them. I am lucky the fibre that I use belongs to the 
utility and my NOC is at their Water tower that they need to monitor, so 
I have redundancy built in. I can't say the same for the hospital half a 
block away.


You have a Good Day now,


Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
Office Phone: 905 349-2084
Office Hours: 9:00am - 5:00pm
skype cajeptha



John Scrivner wrote:
As I have stated before, the health care providers in this area have 
it in their minds (and their policy manuals) that wireless of any kind 
will not be suitable for their needs, period. It has nothing to do 
with technical reality. It has to do with perception and corporate 
policy. Basically health care interests here are not just saying no, 
they are saying hell no. It is a hard sell for me at this point and 
the only vendor who has supplied me with any backup is one I do not 
even buy from, Bridgewave. They sent me technical DOCs, testimonials, 
etc. from health care interests. I passed it along to the health care 
providers in this area and you could hear crickets, right before the 
next hell no. This is frustrating to say the least. If Alvarion or 
anyone else wants to help me I am sure I would take the help. It is in 
all your best interests since I am not the only wireless provider 
effected by this black-balling of our industry by health care 
interests in my region.

Scriv


Peter R. wrote:

Certainly, licensed wireless links and managed firewall delivered by 
your team would be cheaper to deliver; faster to deploy; and just as 
reliable as fiber?


Regards,

Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc.


John Scrivner wrote:

I am afraid they will just build fiber business plans and not give 
wireless a second thought. Why should they consider wireless if they 
can get fiber for virtually free? Like I said...Gr.

Scriv




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Tele-Health Grants

2007-02-05 Thread John Scrivner
This would be great news for me if the medical community around me did 
not have a policy against using wireless technology for data 
communications.   Gr

Scriv

Peter R. wrote:

FCC Grants Available for Telehealth And Telemedicine 
http://www.atsp.org/government/programs.asp?contentID=1895FullStory=.

Association of Telehealth Service Providers

The FCC has recently announced a two-year pilot program that would 
fund up to 85% of the costs for the design, construction and use of 
dedicated broadband networks in order to expand the availability and 
use of telehealth and telemedicine, particularly in rural areas. 
Unlike existing rural health subsidy programs, this new program 
specifically contemplates that major urban health centers would be 
eligible to participate and receive funding if they include rural 
health care providers in the network. The benefit for urban hospitals 
is that they can use the funds to establish direct broadband links 
with rural providers, thus expanding their reach, while also improving 
their own telecommunications infrastructure and connecting with other 
networks and research institutions.



The program makes approximately $55-60 million available for each of 
the two years of the pilot program. The funds come from the existing 
Rural Health Care Fund, which is part of the federal universal service 
program. Public and nonprofit health care providers, such as 
not-for-profit hospitals, may apply for the funds. For-profit health 
care providers can be part of the network, but they must pay their 
costs to connect.



The FCC will look primarily at two criteria:


1. to what extent does the proposed network include rural health care 
providers; and 2. what is the business plan for eventually making the 
network self-sustaining.



Thus, the key to a successful application is to pull together as many 
health care providers - both urban and rural - as possible in order to 
create regional networks. In this way, urban centers can expand their 
footprint into rural areas and the rural providers will gain access, 
via telemedicine, to the sophisticated practices and programs that 
urban centers provide. The program will also fund high-speed 
connections to the Internet2, a national broadband network dedicated 
to universities and research institutions, such as the NIH.



Applications for the initial, first-year round of funding will be due 
sometime in the next couple of months. Applications can also be 
submitted later for the second year of funding. If accepted into the 
program by the FCC, the applicant will follow the standard procedures 
for funding from FCC universal service programs.



The funding application must:identify the organization that will be 
legally and financially responsible for the conduct of activities 
supported by the fund;



identify the goals and objectives of the proposed network (we believe 
that a proposal that connects multiple rural health care providers 
over a state or region and describes the types of 
telemedicine/telehealth services and benefits that can be provided 
over the network will have a better chance of being accepted);


estimate the network's total costs for each year;

describe how for-profit network participants will pay their fair share 
of the network costs;


identify the source of financial support and anticipated revenues that 
will pay for costs not covered by the fund (this could come from 
increased patient referrals form the rural to urban centers or other 
fees associated with the provision of telemedicine/telehealth 
services; also additional funding might be available from state or 
other grant programs);


list the health care facilities that will be included in the network;

provide the address, zip code, rural urban commuting area (RUCA) code 
and phone number for each health care facility participating in the 
network;


indicate previous experience in developing and managing telemedicine 
programs;


provide a project management plan outlining the project�s leadership 
and management structure, as well as its work plan, schedule and budget;


indicate how the telemedicine program will be coordinated throughout 
the state or region; and


indicate to what extent the network can be self-sustaining once 
established.




(Source: Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo P.C.Law Firm, 
Press Release, January 31, 2007)





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Tele-Health Grants

2007-02-05 Thread Tom DeReggi

Interesting.

I didn't know there was a such thing as a non-profit health care facility.
So am I understanding this correctly... They are funding a backbone network, 
but for-profit health care subscibers (generally everyone) pay for access?


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Peter R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 2:20 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Tele-Health Grants


FCC Grants Available for Telehealth And Telemedicine 
http://www.atsp.org/government/programs.asp?contentID=1895FullStory=.

Association of Telehealth Service Providers

The FCC has recently announced a two-year pilot program that would fund up 
to 85% of the costs for the design, construction and use of dedicated 
broadband networks in order to expand the availability and use of 
telehealth and telemedicine, particularly in rural areas. Unlike existing 
rural health subsidy programs, this new program specifically contemplates 
that major urban health centers would be eligible to participate and 
receive funding if they include rural health care providers in the 
network. The benefit for urban hospitals is that they can use the funds to 
establish direct broadband links with rural providers, thus expanding 
their reach, while also improving their own telecommunications 
infrastructure and connecting with other networks and research 
institutions.



The program makes approximately $55-60 million available for each of the 
two years of the pilot program. The funds come from the existing Rural 
Health Care Fund, which is part of the federal universal service program. 
Public and nonprofit health care providers, such as not-for-profit 
hospitals, may apply for the funds. For-profit health care providers can 
be part of the network, but they must pay their costs to connect.



The FCC will look primarily at two criteria:


1. to what extent does the proposed network include rural health care 
providers; and 2. what is the business plan for eventually making the 
network self-sustaining.



Thus, the key to a successful application is to pull together as many 
health care providers - both urban and rural - as possible in order to 
create regional networks. In this way, urban centers can expand their 
footprint into rural areas and the rural providers will gain access, via 
telemedicine, to the sophisticated practices and programs that urban 
centers provide. The program will also fund high-speed connections to the 
Internet2, a national broadband network dedicated to universities and 
research institutions, such as the NIH.



Applications for the initial, first-year round of funding will be due 
sometime in the next couple of months. Applications can also be submitted 
later for the second year of funding. If accepted into the program by the 
FCC, the applicant will follow the standard procedures for funding from 
FCC universal service programs.



The funding application must:identify the organization that will be 
legally and financially responsible for the conduct of activities 
supported by the fund;



identify the goals and objectives of the proposed network (we believe that 
a proposal that connects multiple rural health care providers over a state 
or region and describes the types of telemedicine/telehealth services and 
benefits that can be provided over the network will have a better chance 
of being accepted);


estimate the network's total costs for each year;

describe how for-profit network participants will pay their fair share of 
the network costs;


identify the source of financial support and anticipated revenues that 
will pay for costs not covered by the fund (this could come from increased 
patient referrals form the rural to urban centers or other fees associated 
with the provision of telemedicine/telehealth services; also additional 
funding might be available from state or other grant programs);


list the health care facilities that will be included in the network;

provide the address, zip code, rural urban commuting area (RUCA) code and 
phone number for each health care facility participating in the network;


indicate previous experience in developing and managing telemedicine 
programs;


provide a project management plan outlining the project�s leadership and 
management structure, as well as its work plan, schedule and budget;


indicate how the telemedicine program will be coordinated throughout the 
state or region; and


indicate to what extent the network can be self-sustaining once 
established.




(Source: Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo P.C.Law Firm, Press 
Release, January 31, 2007)




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

Re: [WISPA] Tele-Health Grants

2007-02-05 Thread Tom DeReggi

maybe the free money will change their policies :-)

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tele-Health Grants


This would be great news for me if the medical community around me did not 
have a policy against using wireless technology for data communications. 
Gr

Scriv

Peter R. wrote:

FCC Grants Available for Telehealth And Telemedicine 
http://www.atsp.org/government/programs.asp?contentID=1895FullStory=.

Association of Telehealth Service Providers

The FCC has recently announced a two-year pilot program that would fund 
up to 85% of the costs for the design, construction and use of dedicated 
broadband networks in order to expand the availability and use of 
telehealth and telemedicine, particularly in rural areas. Unlike existing 
rural health subsidy programs, this new program specifically contemplates 
that major urban health centers would be eligible to participate and 
receive funding if they include rural health care providers in the 
network. The benefit for urban hospitals is that they can use the funds 
to establish direct broadband links with rural providers, thus expanding 
their reach, while also improving their own telecommunications 
infrastructure and connecting with other networks and research 
institutions.



The program makes approximately $55-60 million available for each of the 
two years of the pilot program. The funds come from the existing Rural 
Health Care Fund, which is part of the federal universal service program. 
Public and nonprofit health care providers, such as not-for-profit 
hospitals, may apply for the funds. For-profit health care providers can 
be part of the network, but they must pay their costs to connect.



The FCC will look primarily at two criteria:


1. to what extent does the proposed network include rural health care 
providers; and 2. what is the business plan for eventually making the 
network self-sustaining.



Thus, the key to a successful application is to pull together as many 
health care providers - both urban and rural - as possible in order to 
create regional networks. In this way, urban centers can expand their 
footprint into rural areas and the rural providers will gain access, via 
telemedicine, to the sophisticated practices and programs that urban 
centers provide. The program will also fund high-speed connections to the 
Internet2, a national broadband network dedicated to universities and 
research institutions, such as the NIH.



Applications for the initial, first-year round of funding will be due 
sometime in the next couple of months. Applications can also be submitted 
later for the second year of funding. If accepted into the program by the 
FCC, the applicant will follow the standard procedures for funding from 
FCC universal service programs.



The funding application must:identify the organization that will be 
legally and financially responsible for the conduct of activities 
supported by the fund;



identify the goals and objectives of the proposed network (we believe 
that a proposal that connects multiple rural health care providers over a 
state or region and describes the types of telemedicine/telehealth 
services and benefits that can be provided over the network will have a 
better chance of being accepted);


estimate the network's total costs for each year;

describe how for-profit network participants will pay their fair share of 
the network costs;


identify the source of financial support and anticipated revenues that 
will pay for costs not covered by the fund (this could come from 
increased patient referrals form the rural to urban centers or other fees 
associated with the provision of telemedicine/telehealth services; also 
additional funding might be available from state or other grant 
programs);


list the health care facilities that will be included in the network;

provide the address, zip code, rural urban commuting area (RUCA) code and 
phone number for each health care facility participating in the network;


indicate previous experience in developing and managing telemedicine 
programs;


provide a project management plan outlining the project�s leadership 
and management structure, as well as its work plan, schedule and budget;


indicate how the telemedicine program will be coordinated throughout the 
state or region; and


indicate to what extent the network can be self-sustaining once 
established.




(Source: Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo P.C.Law Firm, 
Press Release, January 31, 2007)





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http

Re: [WISPA] Tele-Health Grants

2007-02-05 Thread John Scrivner
I am afraid they will just build fiber business plans and not give 
wireless a second thought. Why should they consider wireless if they can 
get fiber for virtually free? Like I said...Gr.

Scriv


Tom DeReggi wrote:


maybe the free money will change their policies :-)

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Tele-Health Grants


This would be great news for me if the medical community around me 
did not have a policy against using wireless technology for data 
communications. Gr

Scriv

Peter R. wrote:

FCC Grants Available for Telehealth And Telemedicine 
http://www.atsp.org/government/programs.asp?contentID=1895FullStory=.

Association of Telehealth Service Providers

The FCC has recently announced a two-year pilot program that would 
fund up to 85% of the costs for the design, construction and use of 
dedicated broadband networks in order to expand the availability and 
use of telehealth and telemedicine, particularly in rural areas. 
Unlike existing rural health subsidy programs, this new program 
specifically contemplates that major urban health centers would be 
eligible to participate and receive funding if they include rural 
health care providers in the network. The benefit for urban 
hospitals is that they can use the funds to establish direct 
broadband links with rural providers, thus expanding their reach, 
while also improving their own telecommunications infrastructure and 
connecting with other networks and research institutions.



The program makes approximately $55-60 million available for each of 
the two years of the pilot program. The funds come from the existing 
Rural Health Care Fund, which is part of the federal universal 
service program. Public and nonprofit health care providers, such as 
not-for-profit hospitals, may apply for the funds. For-profit health 
care providers can be part of the network, but they must pay their 
costs to connect.



The FCC will look primarily at two criteria:


1. to what extent does the proposed network include rural health 
care providers; and 2. what is the business plan for eventually 
making the network self-sustaining.



Thus, the key to a successful application is to pull together as 
many health care providers - both urban and rural - as possible in 
order to create regional networks. In this way, urban centers can 
expand their footprint into rural areas and the rural providers will 
gain access, via telemedicine, to the sophisticated practices and 
programs that urban centers provide. The program will also fund 
high-speed connections to the Internet2, a national broadband 
network dedicated to universities and research institutions, such as 
the NIH.



Applications for the initial, first-year round of funding will be 
due sometime in the next couple of months. Applications can also be 
submitted later for the second year of funding. If accepted into the 
program by the FCC, the applicant will follow the standard 
procedures for funding from FCC universal service programs.



The funding application must:identify the organization that will be 
legally and financially responsible for the conduct of activities 
supported by the fund;



identify the goals and objectives of the proposed network (we 
believe that a proposal that connects multiple rural health care 
providers over a state or region and describes the types of 
telemedicine/telehealth services and benefits that can be provided 
over the network will have a better chance of being accepted);


estimate the network's total costs for each year;

describe how for-profit network participants will pay their fair 
share of the network costs;


identify the source of financial support and anticipated revenues 
that will pay for costs not covered by the fund (this could come 
from increased patient referrals form the rural to urban centers or 
other fees associated with the provision of telemedicine/telehealth 
services; also additional funding might be available from state or 
other grant programs);


list the health care facilities that will be included in the network;

provide the address, zip code, rural urban commuting area (RUCA) 
code and phone number for each health care facility participating in 
the network;


indicate previous experience in developing and managing telemedicine 
programs;


provide a project management plan outlining the project�s 
leadership and management structure, as well as its work plan, 
schedule and budget;


indicate how the telemedicine program will be coordinated throughout 
the state or region; and


indicate to what extent the network can be self-sustaining once 
established.




(Source: Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo P.C.Law Firm, 
Press Release, January 31, 2007)





--
WISPA Wireless List