Re: [WISPA] That Internet invention too often wrongly cited to justify big government.

2012-07-31 Thread Fred Goldstein

At 7/31/2012 08:57 AM, Cliff Lebouef wrote:


Gordon Crovitz: Who Really Invented the Internet?

7/24/12 The Wall Street Journal


Yes, Crovitz' article got some serious reactions from the people who 
were actually there, the Internet old timers.  He began by confusing 
Ethernet with Internet, perhaps because they rhyme and are both 
high-techy things, which to a finance guy like him make them 
equivalent.  Then he completely distorts the history of the ARPANET 
and how the Internet evolved from it.  He wasn't there.  I was, and I 
was at BBN in the 1970s when we were building the ARPANET for the 
government.  And I was at BBN in 1994 when they bought three of the 
previously government-sponsored NSFnet regional nets from their 
university owners and created a commercial ISP business.


Just goes to show you that when Rupert Murdoch wants to spread a lie, 
he'll spread a real whopper.



 --
 Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
 ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
 +1 617 795 2701 ___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] That Internet invention too often wrongly cited to justify big government.

2012-07-31 Thread Brad Belton
I think the point of the article is once big government got out of the way,
private interests (i.e. businesses) ran with the idea and it flourished.  

 

Best,

 

 

Brad

 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 8:22 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] That Internet invention too often wrongly cited to
justify big government.

 

At 7/31/2012 08:57 AM, Cliff Lebouef wrote:




Gordon Crovitz: Who Really Invented the Internet?

7/24/12 The Wall Street Journal


Yes, Crovitz' article got some serious reactions from the people who were
actually there, the Internet old timers.  He began by confusing Ethernet
with Internet, perhaps because they rhyme and are both high-techy things,
which to a finance guy like him make them equivalent.  Then he completely
distorts the history of the ARPANET and how the Internet evolved from it.
He wasn't there.  I was, and I was at BBN in the 1970s when we were building
the ARPANET for the government.  And I was at BBN in 1994 when they bought
three of the previously government-sponsored NSFnet regional nets from their
university owners and created a commercial ISP business.

Just goes to show you that when Rupert Murdoch wants to spread a lie, he'll
spread a real whopper.




 --
 Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com   
 ionary Consultinghttp://www.ionary.com/ 
 +1 617 795 2701

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] That Internet invention too often wrongly cited to justify big government.

2012-07-31 Thread Jeff Broadwick - Lists
Either way, President Obama’s statement that the internet was created so
that “all companies could make money off the Internet is patently false.  

I'm not one that disregards the positive things that have come out of
(particularly) government defense and space spending, but those are side
benefits, not the primary purpose.

Regards,

Jeff
Sales Manager, Blue Technology
574-935-8484 x106 (US/Can)
574-220-7826 (Cell)
+1 574-935-8484 (Int'l) 

From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 9:22 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] That Internet invention too often wrongly cited to
justify big government.

At 7/31/2012 08:57 AM, Cliff Lebouef wrote:


Gordon Crovitz: Who Really Invented the Internet?

7/24/12 The Wall Street Journal

Yes, Crovitz' article got some serious reactions from the people who were
actually there, the Internet old timers.  He began by confusing Ethernet
with Internet, perhaps because they rhyme and are both high-techy things,
which to a finance guy like him make them equivalent.  Then he completely
distorts the history of the ARPANET and how the Internet evolved from it. 
He wasn't there.  I was, and I was at BBN in the 1970s when we were building
the ARPANET for the government.  And I was at BBN in 1994 when they bought
three of the previously government-sponsored NSFnet regional nets from their
university owners and created a commercial ISP business.

Just goes to show you that when Rupert Murdoch wants to spread a lie, he'll
spread a real whopper.


 --
 Fred Goldstein    k1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com   
 ionary Consulting        http://www.ionary.com/ 
 +1 617 795 2701

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] That Internet invention too often wrongly cited to justify big government.

2012-07-31 Thread Fred Goldstein
At 7/31/2012 09:28 AM, Brad Belton wrote:

I think the point of the article is once big government got out of 
the way, private interests (i.e. businesses) ran with the idea and 
it flourished.

Yes, that was the proopaganda point he was trying to make.  But it 
was a flat-out lie when applied to the Internet.  The government 
funded the development of the Internet.  The government built and 
paid to run the Internet for years, for its own purposes.  The 
government then let more and more non-governmental users (NSFnet 
educational) onto its Internet.  All during this time, commercial 
internets (small-i) could have been built, and some were, but the 
critical mass of widespread connectivity happened when the 
government's Internet (big-I) was opened up to the general public, 
and government funding then ended.

Everyone's entitled to their own opinions, but not to their own 
facts.  Crovitz made stuff up that was just totally wrong, two 
quadrants opposed to the truth.  He was no more accurate than 
Stalin's propagandists.

In plain fact, the key move that made any public internet possible 
was a regulatory decision made by the FCC in the mid-1970s, the 
Sharing and Resale decision.  They ordered ATT and other LECs to 
permit private lines to be shared and resold.  Before that, a private 
line could only be run between a single customers' own sites.  A line 
to your own customer was only available to licensed common 
carriers.  A BBNer, Ralph Alter, went out and got FCC approval as the 
first packet-switched common carrier, PCI, in 1973.  Shortly 
afterwards, BBN itself started up Telenet, while Tyment and Graphnet 
also got licensed.  After the Sharing and Resale decision, becoming 
an ISP didn't require a common carrier license.  Then 1980's Computer 
II decision forced the Bells to sell basic services to competitors 
if they wanted to offer enhanced services.  The revocation of that 
in 2005 led to the NN kerfuffle and the demise of more wireline ISPs.

Jeff Broadwick adds,
Either way, President Obama's statement that the internet was created so
that all companies could make money off the Internet is patently false.

Well, no.  His statement, read in context of the full paragraph, 
clearly meant something else entirely.  His so that was not meant 
as created for the express purpose of, but as its perfectly good 
alternative meaning with the effect that.  The ARPANET was created 
*not* to survive nuclear war (it was not a Strategic network) but to 
permit researchers (at industry and universities, as well as within 
the government) to share resources.  The more decentralized but still 
subsidized Internet evolved in the 1980s.  When it was privatized by 
the Clinton administration, companies could make then money off of it.

(I note that the Romney campaign has been playing the selective 
editing trick.  President Obama was clearly and plainly talking about 
highways and schools when he said, you didn't create that, but by 
editing out that reference and stringing other sentences together, he 
pretended that Obama told businessmen that they didn't create their 
own businesses.  You can pretty much make anyone seem to say anything 
that way, as Colbert viewers know.)

  --
  Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
  ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] That Internet invention too often wrongly cited to justify big government.

2012-07-31 Thread Jeff Broadwick - Lists
He said what he said Fred.  He's the guy who's supposed to be the
uber-communicator.  Did some of it get taken out of context?  Perhaps, but
the overall context of saying that your success wasn't because you were
smart or worked hard was even worse.

Back to work now.

Regards,

Jeff
Sales Manager, Blue Technology
574-935-8484 x106 (US/Can)
574-220-7826 (Cell)
+1 574-935-8484 (Int'l)

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 10:23 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] That Internet invention too often wrongly cited to
justify big government.

At 7/31/2012 09:28 AM, Brad Belton wrote:

I think the point of the article is once big government got out of 
the way, private interests (i.e. businesses) ran with the idea and 
it flourished.

Yes, that was the proopaganda point he was trying to make.  But it 
was a flat-out lie when applied to the Internet.  The government 
funded the development of the Internet.  The government built and 
paid to run the Internet for years, for its own purposes.  The 
government then let more and more non-governmental users (NSFnet 
educational) onto its Internet.  All during this time, commercial 
internets (small-i) could have been built, and some were, but the 
critical mass of widespread connectivity happened when the 
government's Internet (big-I) was opened up to the general public, 
and government funding then ended.

Everyone's entitled to their own opinions, but not to their own 
facts.  Crovitz made stuff up that was just totally wrong, two 
quadrants opposed to the truth.  He was no more accurate than 
Stalin's propagandists.

In plain fact, the key move that made any public internet possible 
was a regulatory decision made by the FCC in the mid-1970s, the 
Sharing and Resale decision.  They ordered ATT and other LECs to 
permit private lines to be shared and resold.  Before that, a private 
line could only be run between a single customers' own sites.  A line 
to your own customer was only available to licensed common 
carriers.  A BBNer, Ralph Alter, went out and got FCC approval as the 
first packet-switched common carrier, PCI, in 1973.  Shortly 
afterwards, BBN itself started up Telenet, while Tyment and Graphnet 
also got licensed.  After the Sharing and Resale decision, becoming 
an ISP didn't require a common carrier license.  Then 1980's Computer 
II decision forced the Bells to sell basic services to competitors 
if they wanted to offer enhanced services.  The revocation of that 
in 2005 led to the NN kerfuffle and the demise of more wireline ISPs.

Jeff Broadwick adds,
Either way, President Obama's statement that the internet was created so
that all companies could make money off the Internet is patently false.

Well, no.  His statement, read in context of the full paragraph, 
clearly meant something else entirely.  His so that was not meant 
as created for the express purpose of, but as its perfectly good 
alternative meaning with the effect that.  The ARPANET was created 
*not* to survive nuclear war (it was not a Strategic network) but to 
permit researchers (at industry and universities, as well as within 
the government) to share resources.  The more decentralized but still 
subsidized Internet evolved in the 1980s.  When it was privatized by 
the Clinton administration, companies could make then money off of it.

(I note that the Romney campaign has been playing the selective 
editing trick.  President Obama was clearly and plainly talking about 
highways and schools when he said, you didn't create that, but by 
editing out that reference and stringing other sentences together, he 
pretended that Obama told businessmen that they didn't create their 
own businesses.  You can pretty much make anyone seem to say anything 
that way, as Colbert viewers know.)

  --
  Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
  ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701 

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless


Re: [WISPA] That Internet invention too often wrongly cited to justify big government.

2012-07-31 Thread Dan Petermann
  President Obama was clearly and plainly talking about highways and schools 
when he said, you didn't create that, 

The problem lies with that statement itself. They (business owners) did create 
the highways and schools.

Who paid the taxes to build those roads?
Who paid the taxes to build those schools?

Did business owners get exemptions to not pay for those things? 
Or did they get taxed at a higher rate because they made more money?

As roads are so ubiquitous, and they apparently make business thrive, why do 
thousands of business fail every year? Are there no roads where they are 
located?

On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:

 At 7/31/2012 09:28 AM, Brad Belton wrote:
 
 I think the point of the article is once big government got out of 
 the way, private interests (i.e. businesses) ran with the idea and 
 it flourished.
 
 Yes, that was the proopaganda point he was trying to make.  But it 
 was a flat-out lie when applied to the Internet.  The government 
 funded the development of the Internet.  The government built and 
 paid to run the Internet for years, for its own purposes.  The 
 government then let more and more non-governmental users (NSFnet 
 educational) onto its Internet.  All during this time, commercial 
 internets (small-i) could have been built, and some were, but the 
 critical mass of widespread connectivity happened when the 
 government's Internet (big-I) was opened up to the general public, 
 and government funding then ended.
 
 Everyone's entitled to their own opinions, but not to their own 
 facts.  Crovitz made stuff up that was just totally wrong, two 
 quadrants opposed to the truth.  He was no more accurate than 
 Stalin's propagandists.
 
 In plain fact, the key move that made any public internet possible 
 was a regulatory decision made by the FCC in the mid-1970s, the 
 Sharing and Resale decision.  They ordered ATT and other LECs to 
 permit private lines to be shared and resold.  Before that, a private 
 line could only be run between a single customers' own sites.  A line 
 to your own customer was only available to licensed common 
 carriers.  A BBNer, Ralph Alter, went out and got FCC approval as the 
 first packet-switched common carrier, PCI, in 1973.  Shortly 
 afterwards, BBN itself started up Telenet, while Tyment and Graphnet 
 also got licensed.  After the Sharing and Resale decision, becoming 
 an ISP didn't require a common carrier license.  Then 1980's Computer 
 II decision forced the Bells to sell basic services to competitors 
 if they wanted to offer enhanced services.  The revocation of that 
 in 2005 led to the NN kerfuffle and the demise of more wireline ISPs.
 
 Jeff Broadwick adds,
 Either way, President Obama's statement that the internet was created so
 that all companies could make money off the Internet is patently false.
 
 Well, no.  His statement, read in context of the full paragraph, 
 clearly meant something else entirely.  His so that was not meant 
 as created for the express purpose of, but as its perfectly good 
 alternative meaning with the effect that.  The ARPANET was created 
 *not* to survive nuclear war (it was not a Strategic network) but to 
 permit researchers (at industry and universities, as well as within 
 the government) to share resources.  The more decentralized but still 
 subsidized Internet evolved in the 1980s.  When it was privatized by 
 the Clinton administration, companies could make then money off of it.
 
 (I note that the Romney campaign has been playing the selective 
 editing trick.  President Obama was clearly and plainly talking about 
 highways and schools when he said, you didn't create that, but by 
 editing out that reference and stringing other sentences together, he 
 pretended that Obama told businessmen that they didn't create their 
 own businesses.  You can pretty much make anyone seem to say anything 
 that way, as Colbert viewers know.)
 
  --
  Fred Goldsteink1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com
  ionary Consulting  http://www.ionary.com/
  +1 617 795 2701 
 
 ___
 Wireless mailing list
 Wireless@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless