>>>> Mark Nash
> >>>>> UnwiredWest
> >>>>> 1702 W. 2nd Ave
> >>>>> Suite A
> >>>>> Eugene, OR 97402
> >>>>> 541-998-
> >>>>> 541-998-5599 fax
> >>&g
gt;>
>>>>> Fact is...
>>>>>
>>>>> When someone calls up and says "I can't get my VoIP service
>>>>> running
>>>>> right",
>>>>> we troubleshoot it and make it quality enough for them to run
or them to run VoIP.
> >>>
> >>> So why not do it? Lots of things to consider, but quality of our
> >>> connections should not be one of them.
> >>>
> >>> Mark Nash
> >>> UnwiredWest
> >>> 1702 W. 2nd Ave
> >
: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
No. It is a thin client. Basically what happens is the thin client
acts like a receiving fax machine. So when you send a fax the thin
client receives it, converts it into a file that it sends out
ke it quality enough for them to run VoIP.
>>>>
>>>> So why not do it? Lots of things to consider, but quality of our
>>>> connections should not be one of them.
>>>>
>>>> Mark Nash
>>>> UnwiredWest
>>>> 1702 W.
s of things to consider, but quality of our
>>> connections should not be one of them.
>>>
>>> Mark Nash
>>> UnwiredWest
>>> 1702 W. 2nd Ave
>>> Suite A
>>> Eugene, OR 97402
>>> 541-998-
>>> 541-998-5599 fax
>>
BEHOLD! THE POWER OF THE LIST
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Nick Olsen
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:46 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
My god, Why am I just finding
My god, Why am I just finding these now
Nick Olsen
Network Engineer / Customer Support
(321) 205-1100 x106
From: "Josh Luthman"
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 12:35 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti Air
] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
> >
> >
> >> In all fairness I've got VoIP running all over the place on
> >> Ubiquity
> >> gear and its working fine...
> >>
> >> I imagine every scenario would be different, it usually is. Same
> >>
Weird. We use the Rocket APs and Nano5M CPE's heavily and for a TON of
VoIP. No problems.
Occasionally we'll see PPPoE re-connect, but since we VLAN the VoIP straight
through, it's unaffected.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:10 AM, can...@believewireless.net <
p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
> Upgra
nections should not be one of them.
>
> Mark Nash
> UnwiredWest
> 1702 W. 2nd Ave
> Suite A
> Eugene, OR 97402
> 541-998-
> 541-998-5599 fax
> http://www.unwiredwest.com
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Carullo"
> To: ; "WISPA Gene
our
> connections should not be one of them.
>
> Mark Nash
> UnwiredWest
> 1702 W. 2nd Ave
> Suite A
> Eugene, OR 97402
> 541-998-
> 541-998-5599 fax
> http://www.unwiredwest.com
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Carullo"
> To:
nwiredwest.com
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Carullo"
> To:; "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 8:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
>
>
>
>> In all fairness I've got VoIP running all ov
t.com
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Carullo"
To: ; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
> In all fairness I've got VoIP running all over the place on Ubiquity
> gear and its wo
me tool
> doesn't work for every job.
>
> Scott Carullo
> Brevard Wireless
> 321-205-1100 x102
>
>
>
>From: "can...@believewireless.net"
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:10 AM
> To: "WISPA General List
-1100 x102
From: "can...@believewireless.net"
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:10 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
Upgraded the AP and all CPE to Beta 5 this morning and latency still
sucks. Signal is a -57 on one side and -59 on the
"John Scrivner"
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:03 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Tom DeReggi
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, funny, does not look like we are making much progress after 18
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
> Yeah, funny, does not look like we are making much progress after 18 years
> does it.
>
Maybe it has something to do with the love affair most in this industry have
with focusing their plans over and over again on rigging up 802.11 products
(v
Have you posted this on the Ubiquiti forums? The developers will work
with you to determine the issue you are seeing, will make the product
better for all of us.
Regards
Michael Baird
> Upgraded the AP and all CPE to Beta 5 this morning and latency still
> sucks. Signal is a -57 on one side and
Upgraded the AP and all CPE to Beta 5 this morning and latency still
sucks. Signal is a -57 on one side and -59 on the other. Every one
of our VoIP customers on this tower is complaining.
<>
WISPA Wants You! Join to
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
>>But for the
>>price of Ubiquiti gear it seems very interesting to investigate what
>>could be done.
>
> Well, thats the golden question...
>
> We dont currently use Ubiquiti yet in a live network, but we cant ignore the
> value proposition.
> W
List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:00 PM, can...@believewireless.net
wrote:
> After some large "experiments" with Ubiquiti.. Canopy 430 here we
> come! Too many problems with latency a
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:00 PM, can...@believewireless.net
wrote:
> After some large "experiments" with Ubiquiti.. Canopy 430 here we
> come! Too many problems with latency and WDS re-reg issues. These
> seem to work pretty well for PtP links, but PtMP is just terrible for
> VoIP or anythin
.
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
From: "Tom DeReggi"
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 8:50 PM
To: can...@believewireless.net, "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
> WDS re-reg issues
ginal Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
Are you suggesting they might not always fess up, but sneak the fix in
:-)
ISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
> One thing I have learned over the years with Mikrotik... they often make
> many other "changes" that they don't specifically list in their text
> document.
>
; internal metric for type 2 external routes;
> > *) added IPv6 support to trafflow (v9 only);
> > *) rewritten user-manager (formerly known as userman-test);
> >
> >
> > Tom DeReggi
> > RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> > IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
> internal metric for type 2 external routes;
> *) added IPv6 support to trafflow (v9 only);
> *) rewritten user-manager (formerly known as userman-test);
>
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
>
BTW, Beta 5 was released today.. supposed to address auto ack...
Faisal
On 4/13/2010 8:07 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
> The recently released firmware (last few days), is the first that really
> works well on the station side (for P2MP), AP is still a bit broken
> w/auto ack. I've not had an issue
2010 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
> After some large "experiments" with Ubiquiti.. Canopy 430 here we
> come! Too many problems with latency and WDS re-reg issues. These
> seem to work pretty well for PtP links, but PtMP is just terrible for
&
et"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
> After some large "experiments" with Ubiquiti.. Canopy 430 here we
> come! Too many problems with latency and WDS re-reg issues. These
>
have you worked w/ ubiquity for any troubleshooting?
been pretty happy here w/ them ... just wondering
I love moto - but just so blessed expensive...
I am wondering if they are really worth the $$$
So as not to hijack your thread - I will post this question in a new
thread...
On Apr 13, 2010
The recently released firmware (last few days), is the first that really
works well on the station side (for P2MP), AP is still a bit broken
w/auto ack. I've not had an issue with WDS reassociations, maybe you
were using auto-ack?
Regards
Michael Baird
> After some large "experiments" with Ubiq
what are the rates on the 430?
are they not up around 10K ?
On Apr 13, 2010, at 8:00 PM, can...@believewireless.net wrote:
> Canopy 430
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
After some large "experiments" with Ubiquiti.. Canopy 430 here we
come! Too many problems with latency and WDS re-reg issues. These
seem to work pretty well for PtP links, but PtMP is just terrible for
VoIP or anything that can't handle latency spikes.
--
6 support to trafflow (v9 only);
*) rewritten user-manager (formerly known as userman-test);
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Cosby"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010
eral List"
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
>
>
>
>> On 13 April 2010 11:52, MDK wrote:
>>
>>> Did you do a throughput comparison?
>>>
>> It was mostly a joke, but I&#x
elevent and desirable fixes.)
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Parr"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
> O
Yeah, funny, does not look like we are making much progress after 18 years
does it.
But we could compare on different criteria, and add Proxim's current
generation. That is Just for Fun...
--AP1000 UbiquitiTsunami MP11a
Speed 3mbps
Beta vs VHS, MAC vs PC, Cadillac vs Hyundai, Sacks5thAve vs Walmart,
Gas vs Electric...
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Jeremy Parr wrote:
> On 13 April 2010 11:52, MDK wrote:
>> Did you do a throughput comparison?
>
> It was mostly a joke, but I'll bite. A throughput comparison is not
> fair,
On 13 April 2010 11:52, MDK wrote:
> Did you do a throughput comparison?
It was mostly a joke, but I'll bite. A throughput comparison is not
fair, since they both just leverage someone else's chipset. My point
was simply that if a low end wifi based product had these features 10+
years ago, why t
And a price comparison?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of MDK
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:52 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison
Did you do a throughput comparison
Did you do a throughput comparison?
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
--
From: "Jeremy Parr"
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 10:49 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
S
43 matches
Mail list logo
