Yeah, funny, does not look like we are making much progress after 18 years 
does it.

But we could compare on different criteria, and add Proxim's current 
generation. That is.... Just for Fun...

----------    AP1000              Ubiquiti                    Tsunami MP11a

Speed             3mbps             30-100mbps?            equivellent per 
channel.
AP Cost          $700               $90                            Still 
High
Interoperabilty Proprietary      Standards                   Still 
proprietary
Life Span:        Discontinued    Future Availabilty       Still Available
Yearly Fee:      Paid updates   Free Updates              Unknown
SpectrumAnalyzer No            Yes.                            Still NO
CPE Limit        16-48             Unlimited                    Still 16-48, 
I think.
CPE Pol            N/A               Dual/Any Pol             Still some CPE 
models Verticle Only.

There has not been much talk about Proxim's MP11A this year. But the product 
is still out there, and capable.
What is really the big difference between Ubiquiti and Proxim? And why is 
Ubiquiti getting so much attention this year?
I'm going to argue that its "mentality" not "technology".  It is mentality 
of some that hold back this industry, and it is mentality of others that is 
allowing this industry to progress.

Ubiquiti's mentality is what is exciting to me. They appear to have a very 
compelling and exciting vision for our industry. We are seeing it by the 
"price" they offer without withholding features.
We are seeing it with creative design of radio models, for example, as 
bundling Grid antenna with CPE.
We see it with embracing the latest antenna trends, embracing Dual Pol, 
something that been almost ignored the last 20 years (by everyone but 
Trango).
(This is super rlevent considering Dual POl sectors used to be $1200 and now 
Ubiquiti delivers them sub $170)
We see it with effort to meet client's demands, for example, developing 
Spectrum Analyzer Software on standard Chipsets within 6 months of the time 
Clients started demanding they needed it for Ubiquiti to be successful for 
WISPs, which is a major feat considering so many others have failed to 
accomplish the same thing over the last 10 years, no matter how much it was 
discussed.
Whats important to note is how quickly they are progressing.

Ubiquiti may not be the God of Wireless, "yet", but at the rate they are 
progressing......  they could be.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeremy Parr" <jeremyp...@gmail.com>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 1:49 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Ubiquiti AirOS Comparison


> Just for fun....
>
>     AP1000   Ubiqiuti
>     KN TurboCell    AirOS
>          1992 2009
>
> Polling MAC Yes Yes
> Radius MAC Auth Yes No
> Metal Enclosure Yes No
> Rugged RF connectors No No
> Modular Wirless Interfaces Yes No
> Per Client RF Stats Yes No
> Complete SNMP MIBs Yes No
>
>
> We've come a long way?
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to