m
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of ralph
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:16 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ruggedized enclosures Mikrotik
Appears to be the one that Ligowave/Deliberant used
gets deformed and will not
stay in its track.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Parsons
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 12:19 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ruggedized enclosures Mikr
See my other response regarding the longevity of this box.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 12:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ruggedized enclosures Mikrotik
ednesday, August 19, 2009 1:34 PM
>> To: "WISPA General List"
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] ruggedized enclosures Mikrotik
>>
>> Looks like nice boxes. Time to get out the old credit card
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
; -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:50 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] ruggedized enclosures mikrotik
>
> Does it have to be tempe
x102
Original Message
> From: "Robert West"
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 1:34 PM
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] ruggedized enclosures Mikrotik
>
> Looks like nice boxes. Time to get out the old credit card
. So long as I can get 3+ years out of it I can't
complain...
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
Original Message
> From: "Josh Luthman"
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 12:14 PM
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Subject: Re: [
a.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 1:50 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ruggedized enclosures mikrotik
The smaller ones (we used rb532) both hinged and 8 screw (man did these
suck).
I personally have never seen an 8
thinking aloud
> here.
> >
> > Bob-
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> > Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:50 AM
> > To: WISPA Genera
: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 1:50 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ruggedized enclosures mikrotik
The smaller ones (we used rb532) both hinged and 8 screw (man did these
suck).
I personally have never seen an 8 screw box leak (I have seen the hinged one
leak).
Josh Luthman
Office: 937
seepage through the seals?? Makes sense to me. Just thinking aloud here.
>
> Bob-
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:50 AM
> To: WISPA Ge
esday, August 19, 2009 11:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ruggedized enclosures mikrotik
Does it have to be temperature controlled? I find that the no-brand chinese
enclosures work here in Ohio - ranging from 110 to -10. The worst scenario
they hold up well against is the 110
bc55a2261>
>
> This is a decent die cast enclosure.
> Scott
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Robert West
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:09 AM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
n...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:50 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] ruggedized enclosures mikrotik
>
> Does it have to be temperature controlled? I find that the no-brand chinese
> enclosures work here in
19, 2009 10:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ruggedized enclosures mikrotik
Does it have to be temperature controlled? I find that the no-brand chinese
enclosures work here in Ohio - ranging from 110 to -10. The worst scenario
they hold up well against is the 110 early afternoons
This is a decent die cast enclosure.
> Scott
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Robert West
> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 10:09 AM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re:
t 19, 2009 10:09 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ruggedized enclosures Mikrotik
We've been using the small pacific wireless boxes with the hinged lid for
our 411 boards. Cast aluminum. I've never had any heat issues from them
but we're in Ohio, not tha
I am in Ohio too. I find that in places where the temperature drops 50
degrees in 12 hours the gasket doesn't hold up at all. One that stands out
is on the side of a hotel - blazing sun to dark shadow. I have taken the
boxes, cleaned them out, put in new equipment and then coax seal the top
edge
We've been using the small pacific wireless boxes with the hinged lid for
our 411 boards. Cast aluminum. I've never had any heat issues from them
but we're in Ohio, not that bad for heat. Could always attach a heat sink
to the rear of it on the outside I bet.
I've been looking for a good box
The new ones I've been getting from Butch are big enough and are pretty
strong. Nice weather proof gasket too.
In fact they are so tough that you have to drill out the knock outs! sigh
We went with these boxes so that we can just swap boards in the future.
We're using bulk head n-f/f gender b
Does it have to be temperature controlled? I find that the no-brand chinese
enclosures work here in Ohio - ranging from 110 to -10. The worst scenario
they hold up well against is the 110 early afternoons to 60 night times and
back - that killed the PacWireless enclosures.
Josh Luthman
Office: 9
21 matches
Mail list logo
