Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 2:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] USF fund reform
Where does a WISP look to find out if their state/city will
allow them to provide broadband service to schools under
the erate program?
I tried searching google but didn'
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] USF fund reform
Same here in Michigan. We provide internet and data services under the
erate to several schools.
John Scrivner wrote:
>
>> Years ago I looked into
s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 12:47 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] USF fund reform
Are you willing to put up a tower to serve 2 customers? Only if you think you
can get your
money back.
John
>-Original Message
Are you willing to put up a tower to serve 2 customers? Only if you think you
can get your money back.
John
>-Original Message-
>From: KyWiFi LLC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 01:11 PM
>To: 'WISPA General List'
>Subject: Re: [WI
out 5-10 years for build
out? I can't think of too many scenarios where you couldn't do it in 10 years.
John
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeromie Reeves [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:30 PM
>To: 'WISPA General List'
>Subject:
Same here in Michigan. We provide internet and data services under the
erate to several schools.
John Scrivner wrote:
Years ago I looked into what it would take to sell access to the
school. erate is set up so that one company provides all telecom
needs to the school. Voice, data etc. Th
Years ago I looked into what it would take to sell access to the
school. erate is set up so that one company provides all telecom needs
to the school. Voice, data etc. The only companies that can do that
are the ilec or a clec.
This is not true in Illinois. We have what is called a "SPIN
uot;'WISPA General List'" ;
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:31 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] USF fund reform
Marlon-
This paper mentions Wispa's desire to see changes in the erate program.
Im familiar with the issues involved with erate in Ohio. What types of
competitive issues
"WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] USF fund reform
I agree, I would think that 12 months is plenty long enough,
definitely not more than 36 months. Take our company for
example, we deployed 7 broadcast sites in our first 12 months
of oper
eeves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] USF fund reform
10 to 20 year time line? I would like to see 1 to 5 years. I do not see
how a network can not be profitable
in that time frame with "free&q
10 to 20 year time line? I would like to see 1 to 5 years. I do not see
how a network can not be profitable
in that time frame with "free" monies.
Jeromie
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Hi All,
Here's what WISPA is prepared to submit to the commerce committee.
Thought you guys wou
Marlon-
This paper mentions Wispa's desire to see changes in the erate program.
Im familiar with the issues involved with erate in Ohio. What types of
competitive issues are other wisps facing in efforts to win erate
contracts?
Chris
Intelliwave
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Su
12 matches
Mail list logo
