https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
--- Comment #9 from Santiago Ciciliani ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #6)
> (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #4)
> > > What's an example of the format you want? Show an example
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
--- Comment #8 from Santiago Ciciliani ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #5)
> (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #4)
> > What's an example of the format you want? Show an example with two packets.
>
> In particular, is it just
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
--- Comment #7 from Santiago Ciciliani ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #4)
> Currently, we have:
>
> "json", which looks like
>
> [
> {
> "_index": "packets-1999-05-19",
> "_type": "doc",
> "_score": null,
>
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
--- Comment #8 from Alexis La Goutte ---
(In reply to Matthew Weant from comment #7)
> Alexis are you taking this one on or is this open to pull and work?
I already work on this, it will be available soon
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
Matthew Weant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mswe...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16581
--- Comment #6 from Uli Heilmeier ---
(In reply to Sunil from comment #5)
> P.S. May I ask if someone is already working on this? as the status shows
> 'IN_PROGRESS' as I wish to contribute. Thanks.
Yes, there is a commit (see comment
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743
--- Comment #45 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 37566 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń:
FTDI MPSSE: Dissect Bad Command response payload
https://code.wireshark.org/review/37566
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16658
Bug ID: 16658
Summary: Inconsistency in the man page for Windows as well as
Linux
Product: Wireshark
Version: 3.2.4
Hardware: x86
OS: Windows 10
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16581
Sunil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b18...@students.iitmandi.ac
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Add FSSO (Fortinet Single |Add FSSO (Fortinet Single
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
--- Comment #6 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #5)
> (In reply to Guy Harris from comment #4)
> > What's an example of the format you want? Show an example with two packets.
>
> In particular, is it just "ek
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16655
--- Comment #3 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Tomasz Mon from comment #2)
> Or have some abort dissection macro similar to REPORT_DISSECTOR_BUG() that
> would not trigger a buildbot report.
If you want such a mechanism, that's best
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16655
--- Comment #2 from Tomasz Mon ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #1)
> Is the problem here just that we produce a ton of dissector "bug" reports
> where the "bug" is "we haven't implemented reassembly yet"?
Yes, I just wanted some
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
--- Comment #6 from Alexis La Goutte ---
Created attachment 17837
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17837=edit
FSSO auth from (RDP/TSAGENT) PC
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17836|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
--- Comment #5 from Alexis La Goutte ---
Created attachment 17836
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17836=edit
FSSO auth from (RDP/TSAGENT) PC
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17835|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
--- Comment #4 from Alexis La Goutte ---
Created attachment 17835
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17835=edit
FSSO auth from (RDP/TSAGENT) PC
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
--- Comment #3 from Alexis La Goutte ---
Created attachment 17834
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17834=edit
FSSO auth from (Windows) PC
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17832|FSSO Keepalive between |FSSO Keepalive between
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
--- Comment #1 from Alexis La Goutte ---
Created attachment 17832
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17832=edit
FSSO Keepalive between DCAgent and Colelctor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
--- Comment #2 from Alexis La Goutte ---
Created attachment 17833
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17833=edit
FSSO Keepalive between TSAgent and Collector
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
Alexis La Goutte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
Ever
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16657
Bug ID: 16657
Summary: Add FSSO (Fortinet Single Sign-One) Dissector
Product: Wireshark
Version: Git
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16655
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86-64 |All
OS|Ubuntu
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16655
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||deso...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16655
--- Comment #1 from Guy Harris ---
Is the problem here just that we produce a ton of dissector "bug" reports where
the "bug" is "we haven't implemented reassembly yet"? If so, the "fix" for the
"bug" should probably either be
1)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
--- Comment #5 from Guy Harris ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #4)
> What's an example of the format you want? Show an example with two packets.
In particular, is it just "ek without the index rows", in which case
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16656
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CONFIRMED |INCOMPLETE
--- Comment #4 from Guy
29 matches
Mail list logo
