https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #18 from Harald Welte ---
I think from my point of view it can be closed, but it might make sense to get
some feedback from the original reporter (or somebody else independent of me)
on whether his
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #17 from Pascal Quantin ---
Harald,
can we close the bug despite the Ping-Bug tag in Git commit message instead of
Bug? Or do you want to keep it open for a long term solution?
Thanks,
Pascal.
--
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #16 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 26984 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
lapdm: Hand B4 frames into a dissector supporting L2 pseudo-length
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #15 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 26983 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
lapdm: Hand B4 frames into a dissector supporting L2 pseudo-length
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #14 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 26982 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
rsl: Fix treatment of SACCH FILL / SACCH INFO MODIFY
https://code.wireshark.org/review/26982
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #13 from Gerrit Code Review ---
Change 26981 had a related patch set uploaded by Pascal Quantin:
rsl: Fix treatment of SACCH FILL / SACCH INFO MODIFY
https://code.wireshark.org/review/26981
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #12 from Harald Welte ---
I presume everyone just has way too much work on their plate already and hence
patches haven't received any review so far.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
Guy Harris changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Linux |All
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #11 from Harald Welte ---
the LAPDm side patch has been submitted as
https://code.wireshark.org/review/26798
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #10 from Harald Welte ---
Created attachment 16252
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16252=edit
patch as submitted to gerrit for LAPDm side
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #8 from Harald Welte ---
I've pushed https://code.wireshark.org/review/26797 as a possible fix. It's
fairly trivial, but it feels quite wrong to call a "gsm_a_ccch" dissector with
something that clearly
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #9 from Harald Welte ---
Created attachment 16251
--> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16251=edit
patch as submitted to gerrit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #7 from Harald Welte ---
Yes, I will post patches. But it may take a fed days or even a week due to
travel plans and the need to get things right this time, testing with handsets,
...
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #6 from Pascal Quantin ---
Soudns a good plan. Will you follow-up with patches?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
Harald Welte changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #5 from Harald Welte ---
Sorry for the late response here. The issue is rather complicated, but has now
shown up several other places like https://osmocom.org/issues/3059 and
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
Pascal Quantin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #3 from Pascal Quantin ---
1O years is a long time, I did not remember some SI could be transmitted over
dedicated channels and not only broadcast ones...
Having a look right now.
--
You are
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #2 from Peter Wu ---
Anonymous user said:
"SI1/2/2ter/2quater/3/4 are usually transmitted on CCCH/BCCH,
SI5/5ter/6 are not, these are usually transmitted on SACCH/SDCCH"
No idea what that means though.
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14105
--- Comment #1 from Pascal Quantin ---
It has been 10 years or so that I have not done 2G, but how could a System
Information be transmitted over SACCH instead of CCCH?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
21 matches
Mail list logo