[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16733] RFH2 Header with 32 or less bytes of NameValue will not parse out that info

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16733 --- Comment #1 from Jaap Keuter --- I guess you can use the display filter mq.head.format == "MQSTR " to show those packets? Can you tell us which of the packets you think show the problem? Are you preparing a fix to push on gerrit? --

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16733] RFH2 Header with 32 or less bytes of NameValue will not parse out that info

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16733 --- Comment #2 from Robert Beardsworth --- I believe that I just use "mq" to filter (it's the Protocol). The problem then turns up on (Info column containing) "MQPUT" (send) or "ASYNC_MESSAGE" (receive). No - I don't have the

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16664] "invalid timestamp" for Systemd Journal Export Block

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16664 --- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37956 had a related patch set uploaded by Jaap Keuter: Systemd journal: Fix timestamp conversions. https://code.wireshark.org/review/37956 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16664] "invalid timestamp" for Systemd Journal Export Block

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16664 --- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37957 had a related patch set uploaded by Jaap Keuter: Systemd journal: Fix timestamp conversions. https://code.wireshark.org/review/37957 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16664] "invalid timestamp" for Systemd Journal Export Block

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16664 Jaap Keuter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS Ever confirmed|0

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16735] same ipv6 packet display duplicates

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16735 --- Comment #1 from Jaap Keuter --- Actual packet capture on Windows systems is performed by Npcap (see npcap.org). Since you did not include the requested Build Information I can only assume that you use Npcap as distributed with the

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16734] "total block length ... is too small" for Systemd Journal Export Block

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16734 Jaap Keuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ger...@wireshark.org --- Comment

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16733] RFH2 Header with 32 or less bytes of NameValue will not parse out that info

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16733 --- Comment #3 from Jaap Keuter --- Okay, in this capture file filter by (mq.tsh.type == 0x86)||(mq.tsh.type == 0x0d) This shows frame# 5802, 6016, 7812 and 8178, having TSH MQ segment type MQPUT or ASYNC_MESSAGE -- You are receiving

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16733] RFH2 Header with 32 or less bytes of NameValue will not parse out that info

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16733 Jaap Keuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||robioneken...@bluewin.ch ---

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16734] New: "total block length ... is too small" for Systemd Journal Export Block

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16734 Bug ID: 16734 Summary: "total block length ... is too small" for Systemd Journal Export Block Product: Wireshark Version: 3.2.4 Hardware: x86-64 OS:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16734] "total block length ... is too small" for Systemd Journal Export Block

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16734 gwaeber changed: What|Removed |Added CC||li...@gilleswaeber.ch -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16735] New: same ipv6 packet display duplicates

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16735 Bug ID: 16735 Summary: same ipv6 packet display duplicates Product: Wireshark Version: 3.2.5 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Windows 10 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16664] "invalid timestamp" for Systemd Journal Export Block

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16664 --- Comment #5 from gwaeber --- I just filed https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16734 for this specific issue -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16664] "invalid timestamp" for Systemd Journal Export Block

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16664 gwaeber changed: What|Removed |Added CC||li...@gilleswaeber.ch -- You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #54 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37954 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Link Bad Command when skipping data https://code.wireshark.org/review/37954 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16734] "total block length ... is too small" for Systemd Journal Export Block

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16734 Alexis La Goutte changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |INCOMPLETE

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16731] uninstall.exe fails - "mmdbresolve.exe could not be removed"

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16731 Chuck Craft changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS Ever confirmed|0

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16733] RFH2 Header with 32 or less bytes of NameValue will not parse out that info

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16733 --- Comment #6 from robionekenobi --- Hi all, I don't have actually the possibility to submit a change to code.wireshark.org Can someone do this for me ? Robert -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16733] RFH2 Header with 32 or less bytes of NameValue will not parse out that info

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16733 --- Comment #5 from robionekenobi --- Created attachment 17908 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17908=edit Patch to correct the bug Hi Jaap, Quick check and test. Robert is right Here a patch Robert --

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16664] "invalid timestamp" for Systemd Journal Export Block

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16664 --- Comment #8 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37956 merged by Anders Broman: Systemd journal: Fix timestamp conversions. https://code.wireshark.org/review/37956 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 16664] "invalid timestamp" for Systemd Journal Export Block

2020-07-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16664 --- Comment #9 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37957 merged by Anders Broman: Systemd journal: Fix timestamp conversions. https://code.wireshark.org/review/37957 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug