[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #58 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 38168 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Display kilohetrz using SI symbol https://code.wireshark.org/review/38168 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #57 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 38167 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Dissect Open-Drain enable parameters https://code.wireshark.org/review/38167 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #56 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37971 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Fix handling commsnds without response https://code.wireshark.org/review/37971 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #55 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37965 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI FT: Rename from ftdift to ftdi-ft https://code.wireshark.org/review/37965 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #54 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37954 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Link Bad Command when skipping data https://code.wireshark.org/review/37954 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #53 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37952 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Match responses to fragmented commands https://code.wireshark.org/review/37952 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #52 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37914 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Dissect CPUMode read response data https://code.wireshark.org/review/37914 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #51 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37913 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Dissect clock N bits commands parameters https://code.wireshark.org/review/37913 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #50 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37899 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Dissect read data bits commands response https://code.wireshark.org/review/37899 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #49 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37891 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Dissect data shifting response https://code.wireshark.org/review/37891 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #48 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37862 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI FT: Add RX payload to tree only when present https://code.wireshark.org/review/37862 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #47 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37827 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Improve command to response tracking https://code.wireshark.org/review/37827 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #46 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37709 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: [WIP] FTDI FT: Reassemble fragmented MPSSE data https://code.wireshark.org/review/37709 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #45 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37566 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Dissect Bad Command response payload https://code.wireshark.org/review/37566 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #44 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 37025 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI FT: Do not finalize empty composite tvb https://code.wireshark.org/review/37025 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #43 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36694 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI FT: Handle RX with more than MaxPacketSize bytes https://code.wireshark.org/review/36694 -- You are receiving this mail

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #42 from litgh...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 17712 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17712=edit Example of modem status bytes in middle of INTERFACE A RX decoding Example pcap attached, see

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #41 from Filipe Laíns --- Do you have a capture file for that? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.___ Sent via:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 litgh...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||litgh...@gmail.com ---

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #39 from Tomasz Mon --- Created attachment 17668 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17668=edit FT2232H MCU host command scan pcap -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #38 from Tomasz Mon --- Created attachment 17667 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17667=edit FT2232L MCU host command scan pcap -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 Tomasz Mon changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17643|FT2232H command scan pcap |FT2232H MPSSE command scan

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 Tomasz Mon changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17640|FT2232L command scan pcap |FT2232L MPSSE command scan

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #37 from Tomasz Mon --- (In reply to Tomasz Mon from comment #36) > I don't understand why CPUMode commands seem to be treated as > Bad Commands on FT2232H and FT2232L. Apparently, these work when you set the bitmode to value

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #36 from Tomasz Mon --- (In reply to Gerrit Code Review from comment #35) > Change 36324 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: > FTDI MPSSE: Match response data with commands > >

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #35 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36324 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Match response data with commands https://code.wireshark.org/review/36324 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #34 from Tomasz Mon --- Created attachment 17655 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17655=edit FT2232H programming OpenVizsla FPGA and starting capture -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #33 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36243 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: USB: Record bcdVersion in device product data https://code.wireshark.org/review/36243 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #32 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36241 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Group commands with parameters https://code.wireshark.org/review/36241 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #31 from Joel Holdsworth --- Yeah - that would be far more readable. You could also put the values in the headline item, or summarize them in cases where the text would be excessively long. [-] FTDI Multi-Protocol

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #30 from Tomasz Mon --- (In reply to Joel Holdsworth from comment #29) > I tested the git commit 055b4c59e4, and it's working better and better. One > request: would it be be possible to group commands and payloads together as

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #29 from Joel Holdsworth --- Created attachment 17646 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17646=edit Ungrouped command payloads I tested the git commit 055b4c59e4, and it's working better and better.

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #28 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36165 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI FT: Add Amonted JTAGkey USB VID/PID https://code.wireshark.org/review/36165 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #27 from Tomasz Mon --- Created attachment 17643 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17643=edit FT2232H command scan pcap -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #26 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36162 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Improve command descriptions https://code.wireshark.org/review/36162 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #25 from Tomasz Mon --- Created attachment 17640 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17640=edit FT2232L command scan pcap FT2232L treats FT232H/FT2232H/FT4232H-only commands as bad commands. Attached

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #23 from Filipe Laíns --- I modified my script to keep sending 00..ff in loop until we get a BadCommand response: https://paste.xinu.at/7sNa Format: cmd -> (data sent) data received ... (BadCommand byte number) This draws a

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #24 from Filipe Laíns --- Created attachment 17638 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17638=edit FT232H Command Scan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #22 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 36147 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI MPSSE: Display pin name alongside signal name https://code.wireshark.org/review/36147 -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #21 from Tomasz Mon --- > See how my 232H reacts to the different commands: https://paste.xinu.at/0hR > Format: [command byte sent] (bit 7) -> [response after sending the command + > 0102030405] It would be good if you could:

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 Filipe Laíns changed: What|Removed |Added CC||la...@archlinux.org --- Comment

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #19 from Joel Holdsworth --- I just tested your new patches. It's now beginning to decode the TX packets quite nicely. As I'm sure you're aware, you still don't have disection of the "Set Data bits LowByte" and "HighByte"

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #18 from Tomasz Mon --- It would be nice to also know the answer to the following: * What happens if bit command is called with length byte value greater than 7? Does it clock more bits? is the length value clipped (e.g. does

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #17 from Tomasz Mon --- (In reply to Joel Holdsworth from comment #16) > Is this expected behavior? Or should it be able to decode this data? Currently yes, that's why it's prefixed with [WIP] that stands for Work In

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 Joel Holdsworth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@airwebreathe.org.uk ---

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #15 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35961 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: [WIP] FTDI MPSSE: Dissect MPSSE commands https://code.wireshark.org/review/35961 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #14 from Tomasz Mon --- (In reply to wsbugs from comment #10) > As the FTDI documentation is only /seemingly/ complete (or my Google-fu > sucks) and my resources are limited, a few things had to be guessed, > and it probably

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #13 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 35734 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI FT: Dissect SetBitMode command https://code.wireshark.org/review/35734 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #12 from wsb...@eclipso.ch --- Created attachment 17555 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17555=edit Traffic for OpenOCD talking an Atmel/Microchip SAMD10 over Olimex ARM-USB-OCD-H adapter in SWD mode

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #11 from wsb...@eclipso.ch --- Created attachment 17554 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17554=edit FTDI-MPSSE dissector in Lua -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 wsb...@eclipso.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wsb...@eclipso.ch --- Comment

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 Tomasz Mon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|IN_PROGRESS |CONFIRMED --- Comment #9 from

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #8 from Jaap Keuter --- Tomasz, are you still working on this or is this as far as it gets? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #7 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 33598 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI FT: Dissect control request response data https://code.wireshark.org/review/33598 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #5 from Tomasz Mon --- Created attachment 17174 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17174=edit TTL-232R-3V3 capture using USBPcap. Control transfers sent when opening port in KiTTY 115200 8N1. -- You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #4 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 33520 had a related patch set uploaded by Tomasz Moń: FTDI FT: Initial USB Bridging Devices dissector https://code.wireshark.org/review/33520 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 Tomasz Mon changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 Tomasz Mon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||deso...@gmail.com --- Comment #3

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #1 from Tim 'mithro' Ansell --- The FTDI chips I'm talking about are the; * FT60x Series ICs – SuperSpeed USB3.0 (Such as FT600, FT601) * FT-X Series ICs – Full Speed USB Peripheral Bridges (Such

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 11743] Add FTDI USB dissector

https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11743 --- Comment #2 from Tim 'mithro' Ansell --- Created attachment 14021 --> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14021=edit Capture of the pipistrello (with a FTDI FT2232H chip - Channel A is wired for