[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12184] MATE AVPL match modes "Loose" and "Every" do not work correctly

2016-09-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184 --- Comment #10 from Peter Wu --- The patch has been merged now, I guess this bug can be closed after fixing the documentation on the wiki? Or do you want to keep it open for adding (a) new mode(s) of match semantics? -- You are receivi

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12184] MATE AVPL match modes "Loose" and "Every" do not work correctly

2016-09-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184 --- Comment #9 from Peter Wu --- At the moment it looks like a misunderstanding of the intended functionality. The important point is that Every and Strict perform pair-wise matching, returning a result AVPL with a length of at most the nu

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12184] MATE AVPL match modes "Loose" and "Every" do not work correctly

2016-09-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184 --- Comment #8 from Peter Wu --- Hmm, I am still not fully certain how multiple AVPs with the same name have to be handled (for matching data AVPs and returning results). In plugins/mate/examples/web.mate there is this snippet (old syntax

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12184] MATE AVPL match modes "Loose" and "Every" do not work correctly

2016-09-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184 --- Comment #7 from Peter Wu --- I have pushed some buggy WIP to implement the (wrong) idea following the updated wiki/bug comments, it will be modified as things become clearer. The current code has one fatal flaw, it compares attributes

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12184] MATE AVPL match modes "Loose" and "Every" do not work correctly

2016-09-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184 --- Comment #6 from Gerrit Code Review --- Change 1 had a related patch set uploaded by Peter Wu: [WIP] mate: document more parts, try to fix matching logic https://code.wireshark.org/review/1 -- You are receiving this mail beca

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12184] MATE AVPL match modes "Loose" and "Every" do not work correctly

2016-09-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Sindelka --- (In reply to Peter Wu from comment #4) > What about adding this to > https://wiki.wireshark.org/Mate/Reference#Every_Match > >... > > The description on the wiki (while it might technically correct)

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12184] MATE AVPL match modes "Loose" and "Every" do not work correctly

2016-09-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184 --- Comment #4 from Peter Wu --- What about adding this to https://wiki.wireshark.org/Mate/Reference#Every_Match (a=1, a=2) Match Every (a=1) ==> (a=1) (a=1, a=2) Match Every (a=1, a=2) ==> (a=1, a=2) (a=1, a=2) Match Every (a

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12184] MATE AVPL match modes "Loose" and "Every" do not work correctly

2016-09-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184 Peter Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #3 from Peter

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12184] MATE AVPL match modes "Loose" and "Every" do not work correctly

2016-09-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Sindelka --- (In reply to Peter Wu from comment #1) Seems it is going to be a language issue, as I've never used English to discuss matters of mathematics. For Every and Strict, I've either misunderstood Luis or

[Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 12184] MATE AVPL match modes "Loose" and "Every" do not work correctly

2016-09-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12184 Peter Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |CONFIRMED CC|