Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-bugs mailing list archive shutting down

How will affect that the visibility for searching for bugs via the Google search-engine? Edwin -Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Gerald Combs Sent: Wednesday, 28 December 2016 06:50 To: Developer

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Lintian fails on PD

Hi Dario (and dev) It is now fixed for master-2.2 with backport of https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/19500/ and i working on master-2.0 to fix also build https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/q/status:open+project:wireshark+branch:master-2.0+topic:fix_checklicense_pd_master-2.0 Cheers On

Re: [Wireshark-dev] make-version.pl "problems"

Change 19508 should fix both of these issues. On 1/2/17 6:20 AM, Anders Broman wrote: > Hi, > > I recently ported the updated make-version.pl to my local SVN based > Wireshark clone and have some problems on Windows: > > With these settings > > > > my $set_version = 1; > > my $set_release

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to modify existing RTP conversation?

Hi, > I would like to know where this is done: > > I analysed the code and found that for #1 is created "full" > conversation (full = SRC_IP:SRC_PORT <-> DST_IP:DST_PORT) with UDP as > protocol. > > because that sounds questionable. packet_udp.c: dissect() calls

Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to modify existing RTP conversation?

Hi, I would like to know where this is done: I analysed the code and found that for #1 is created "full" conversation (full = SRC_IP:SRC_PORT <-> DST_IP:DST_PORT) with UDP as protocol. because that sounds questionable. Thank, Jaap > On 1 Jan 2017, at 21:21, Jirka Novak

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP player redesign in 2.x makes it worse than the legacy one

Hi Jirka, RTP Player is not often use by core team... (but used by a lot of users)... Patches are welcome :) On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Jirka Novak wrote: > Hello Peter, > > > I admit that this is only my opinion, but as someone who uses the RTP > Player > > in