On 22/03/2020 18:29, Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers wrote:
> 5) Treat rpcap as "remote procedure call for libpcap" and put it under the
> the-tcpdump-group team, and put pcap under the pcapng team as per the same
> reason as 4).
Ok.
On Mar 21, 2020, at 2:38 PM, Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers
wrote:
> On Mar 21, 2020, at 2:14 PM, Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers
> wrote:
>
>> The options I see are:
>
> 4) add a new team for rpcap, as it's a protocol rather than a file format,
> and thus only indirectly tied to
On Mar 22, 2020, at 9:49 AM, Michael Tuexen
wrote:
> I would support this. However, last time I tried this, I was not successful.
> There were not very interested in defining a file format...
They've done so in the past:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1761 (and
Ok, thanks.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 9:48 AM Martin Mathieson <
martin.r.mathie...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>> ./asn1/kerberos/packet-kerberos-template.c: In function
>>> ‘dissect_krb5_PAC_CREDENTIAL_INFO’:
>>> ./asn1/kerberos/packet-kerberos-template.c:2187:2: error: implicit
>>> declaration of
> On 21. Mar 2020, at 23:10, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>
> Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers wrote:
>> Currently, on GitHub, there's a "pcapng" team:
>> https://github.com/pcapng
>
>> with one repository containing the pcapng specification, and a
>> "the-tcpdump-group" team:
>
>>
Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers wrote:
> Currently, on GitHub, there's a "pcapng" team:
> https://github.com/pcapng
> with one repository containing the pcapng specification, and a
"the-tcpdump-group" team:
> https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group
> with repositories for
On 21/03/2020 22:14, Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers wrote:
> 1) has the slight disadvantage that the name for the team suggests it's for
> pcapng only; it appears that teams can be renamed:
>
>
>
El sáb., 21 mar. 2020 18:15, Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers <
tcpdump-work...@lists.tcpdump.org> escribió:
> 1) has the slight disadvantage that the name for the team suggests it's
> for pcapng only; it appears that teams can be renamed:
>
>
>
This very much depends on how stable you wish the spec to be. If you
want to to be entirely osified, I recommend actual RFCs. Otherwise,
perhaps a renamed team like "pcap-format" (or whatever the people on the
team want to call it)?
Eliot
On 21.03.20 22:15, Guy Harris wrote:
> There should
Hi Dario,
KERBEROS is listed among OPTIONAL packages not found (at the end of cmake
output). I will also attach CMakeCache.txt.
-- The following OPTIONAL packages have been found:
* Git
* GMODULE2
* PCAP
* ZLIB
* LZ4 , LZ4 is lossless compression algorithm used in some protocol
(CQL...) ,
10 matches
Mail list logo
