On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:37:26 you wrote:
On Thursday 20 November 2014 13:26:29 Bálint Réczey wrote:
I was waiting for Jörg to comment on the change, but I have submitted
it instead:
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/5316/
I saw, also that my two related patches are abandoned.
Bezemer maarten.beze...@gmail.com
To: wireshark-dev wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Sent: Tue, Dec 16, 2014 5:29 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] CMake support out of source plugin compilation
On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:37:26 you wrote:
On Thursday 20 November 2014 13:26:29 Bálint Réczey wrote
, 2014 5:29 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] CMake support out of source plugin compilation
On Thursday 20 November 2014 14:37:26 you wrote:
On Thursday 20 November 2014 13:26:29 Bálint Réczey wrote:
I was waiting for Jörg to comment on the change, but I have submitted
it instead:
https
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 09:24:50 mman...@netscape.net wrote:
Am I correct in understanding most of the patches introduce optional
features, so they shouldn't break existing cmake user setups (of platforms
the Petri-Dish doesn't have)?
Yes, the patches should add new, optional out-of-source
To: Developer support list for Wireshark wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Sent: Tue, Dec 16, 2014 9:31 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] CMake support out of source plugin compilation
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:24 PM, mman...@netscape.net wrote:
I've kicked off the Petri
On 20 November 2014 08:53, Maarten Bezemer maarten.beze...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote:
While I'm all for making life easier for devs, if no-one else has
identified this as a need, i.e. only
On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote:
While I'm all for making life easier for devs, if no-one else has
identified this as a need, i.e. only you find it worthwhile, then we will
end up with stuff not generally used in the
On Thursday 20 November 2014 09:01:03 Graham Bloice wrote:
On 20 November 2014 08:53, Maarten Bezemer maarten.beze...@gmail.com
Is there anything left for me to do or to explain?
I would like gain some momentum either direction (approved or abandoned),
so I know whether my current (out of
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Graham Bloice
graham.blo...@trihedral.com wrote:
On 20 November 2014 08:53, Maarten Bezemer maarten.beze...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote:
While I'm all for
On 20 November 2014 10:51, Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Graham Bloice
graham.blo...@trihedral.com wrote:
On 20 November 2014 08:53, Maarten Bezemer maarten.beze...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote:
2014-11-20 9:53 GMT+01:00 Maarten Bezemer maarten.beze...@gmail.com:
On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote:
While I'm all for making life easier for devs, if no-one else has
identified this as a need, i.e. only you find it
On Thursday 20 November 2014 13:26:29 Bálint Réczey wrote:
2014-11-20 9:53 GMT+01:00 Maarten Bezemer maarten.beze...@gmail.com:
On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote:
While I'm all for making life easier for devs, if
Hello,
This email is (a bit) long, as I am trying to explain the Wireshark patches I
send, as requested by Graham Bloice.
First of all: I am new to Wireshark and its development. Furthermore I am also
new to cmake development/scripting. So I'll explain my context/background in
this to make
On 13 November 2014 13:21, Maarten Bezemer maarten.beze...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
This email is (a bit) long, as I am trying to explain the Wireshark
patches I
send, as requested by Graham Bloice.
Thanks for this, I was trying to understand what was going on from all the
fragments.
On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote:
On 13 November 2014 13:21, Maarten Bezemer maarten.beze...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
This email is (a bit) long, as I am trying to explain the Wireshark
patches I
send, as requested by Graham Bloice.
Thanks for this, I was
15 matches
Mail list logo
