On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 12:47, Joakim Karlsson wrote:
> Maybe it's time to split .h and .c files
>
> /include
> /src
>
> //Joakim
>
>
Apart from the oddness of altering our code layout due to the
inadequacies of the review platform, there are nearly 1500 .c files so that
won't fix the issue.
>
Maybe it's time to split .h and .c files
/include
/src
//Joakim
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 23:50, chuck c wrote:
> It's not all bad. I've gotten much better at navigating the code using
> VSCode since the migration.
> :-)
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 4:27 PM Graham Bloice
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On We
It's not all bad. I've gotten much better at navigating the code using
VSCode since the migration.
:-)
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 4:27 PM Graham Bloice
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 19:44, Maynard, Chris via Wireshark-dev <
> wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote:
>
>> It doesn’t seem to be possi
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 19:44, Maynard, Chris via Wireshark-dev <
wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote:
> It doesn’t seem to be possible to list all dissectors in a web browser
> anymore, and those that are listed are populated very slowly.
> Compare the loading of
> *https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wire
GitLab currently has a limit of 1000 items when listing directories according
to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/20687.
FWIW, GitHub appears to have a similar limit:
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/tree/master/Formula
https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg/tree/master/ports
Hello,
I have the very same behavior, my browser being Firefox 80.0 (64 bits)
Le mer. 9 sept. 2020 à 20:44, Maynard, Chris via Wireshark-dev
a écrit :
>
> It doesn’t seem to be possible to list all dissectors in a web browser
> anymore, and those that are listed are populated very slowly.
> Com
It doesn't seem to be possible to list all dissectors in a web browser anymore,
and those that are listed are populated very slowly.
Compare the loading of
https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/tree/master/epan/dissectors with that
of
https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;
