Re: [Wireshark-dev] New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach

2011-02-25 Thread Jeff Morriss
Martin Kaiser wrote: I uploaded a new version of the dvb-ci dissector to the bugtracker a week ago, fixing the issues you found when reviewing the code. Before that, I requested a DLT at the tcpdump workers list. Unfortunately, there's been no response yet. Any chance you can have a look and

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach

2011-02-25 Thread Martin Kaiser
Hi Jeff, Thus wrote Jeff Morriss (jeff.morriss...@gmail.com): FWIW, my experience with tcpdump-workers has been that you must be subscribed in order for your email to go through. When I tried to send that list messages without being subscribed, I got (IIRC) silent discards. I

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach

2011-02-24 Thread Martin Kaiser
Hello Bill, Guy, Thus wrote Martin Kaiser (li...@kaiser.cx): Thus wrote Guy Harris (g...@alum.mit.edu): 2. The dissector processes both the pseudo-header and the actual data. I.E., From the Wireshark perspective, the pseudo-header is just part of the captured data (similar

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach

2011-02-11 Thread Martin Kaiser
Hello Bill, Guy, Thus wrote Guy Harris (g...@alum.mit.edu): 2. The dissector processes both the pseudo-header and the actual data. I.E., From the Wireshark perspective, the pseudo-header is just part of the captured data (similar to the code in your original patch). This is

[Wireshark-dev] New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach

2011-02-10 Thread Bill Meier
(Extracts of comments on Bug #5654 copied to wireshark-dev for further discussion) (From Martin Kaiser) I would like to submit a dissector for the DVB Common Interface. It's a protocol between a PCMCIA module and a DVB receiver that is implemented in the vast majority of DVB-compliant devices

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach

2011-02-10 Thread Bill Meier
Do you know of a better way to encode the direction in a pcap file or should I keep the direction byte? (If we go for pcap files and a new DLT, we should agree on this before I can apply for a DLT value). .. --To use a pcap format file to contain your captured DVBCI info: 1. As you note:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach

2011-02-10 Thread Bill Meier
On 2/10/2011 2:38 PM, Bill Meier wrote: 1. libpcap processes the pseudo-header and fills in a dissector-specific Clarification: libpcap above means the Wireshark libpcap.c (not the libpcap library). ___ Sent via:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach

2011-02-10 Thread Guy Harris
On Feb 10, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Bill Meier wrote: There are two approaches to processing the pseudo-header: 1. libpcap processes the pseudo-header and fills in a dissector-specific structure which is eventually passed to the DVBCI dissector (pinfo-pseudo_header) along with the actual data.