Re: [Wireshark-dev] Setting to disable all expert info

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > > Let's wait until the generation of the expert info results in a measurably > significant CPU or memory use increase before we add a knob to turn it > off. There are probably other places to look at to reduce memory usage

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Setting to disable all expert info

t;wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Cc: Sultan, Hassan <sul...@amazon.com> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Setting to disable all expert info > > > > 2017-08-02 22:00 GMT+02:00 Sultan, Hassan via Wireshark-dev d...@wireshark.org <mailto:wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> >:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Setting to disable all expert info

On Aug 2, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Pascal Quantin wrote: > Indeed they probably do not represent much compared to all the fields > registered by dissectors. Moreover you are the first one I remember asking > for such a feature. Like Jaap, I do not think this is a good move

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Setting to disable all expert info

Thanks, > > Hassan > > > -Original Message- > > From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On > Behalf > > Of Jaap Keuter > > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 11:59 AM > > To: Sultan, Hassan via Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev@wireshark.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Setting to disable all expert info

-dev@wireshark.org> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Setting to disable all expert info > > Are we going to be picking off features one by one to get the memory footprint > down? Then I see a long list of preference settings growing from this. Not > something I look forward to. >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Setting to disable all expert info

Hi Hassan, 2017-08-02 20:43 GMT+02:00 Sultan, Hassan via Wireshark-dev < wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>: > Hi, > > > > Am I right in my understanding that there is no global way of disabling > insertion of expert information ? > You are right. > > > Assuming I’m correct, would anyone object to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Setting to disable all expert info

Are we going to be picking off features one by one to get the memory footprint down? Then I see a long list of preference settings growing from this. Not something I look forward to. On 02-08-17 20:43, Sultan, Hassan via Wireshark-dev wrote: > Hi, > > > > Am I right in my understanding that