On Friday 28 March 2014 13:10:09 我想不无聊 wrote:
then I add the file to /gtk/main.c file ,
#include peformance.h //somebody told me not to use ../peformance.h
because there is subdir to search
Well, I was that somebody and refused to reply on the last private mail
because you provided *no*
Howdy,
Is there any reason not to make wireshark 1.11.x and beyond only use Lua 5.2?
Right now the automated builds are getting built with 5.1.
There's very little difference to end users (i.e., older scripts should
continue to work)... but for the C-code it's a lot more painful to have to
If 5.2 has been out for three years at this point it sounds fine to me.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Hadriel Kaplan
hadriel.kap...@oracle.com wrote:
Howdy,
Is there any reason not to make wireshark 1.11.x and beyond only use Lua 5.2?
Right now the automated builds are getting built with
Hi Pavel,
Can you use the revised workflow and submit the change to Gerrit. Any
discussion on the proposed change will take place in the Gerrit Review
process.
Workflow info can be found here:
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow
On 28 March 2014 15:06, Pavel Karneliuk
2014-03-28 16:02 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
+1
The Debian packages use Lua since 1.10.2-2 without any problem.
Cheers,
Balint
2014-03-28 15:45 GMT+01:00 Nakayama Kenjiro nakayamakenj...@gmail.com:
+1
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Hadriel Kaplan
Hello,
At first, thank you all for Wireshark. It is amazing tool!
I found a defect and register Bug
9936https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9936 - epan/follow.c
- Incorrect comparing a sequence number of TCP fragment when its value wraps
over uint32_t limit
A capture file and
Hi Pascal,
thank you for answer. I saw your commits to follow.c and I hoped for your reply.
450:if( newseq seq[idx] ) {
I think - Yes. It compares sequence numbers.
459: if ( current-data_len new_pos ) {
I am sure, that - No. Because it compares length of data from fragment instead
of
2014-03-28 16:34 GMT+01:00 Hadriel Kaplan hadriel.kap...@oracle.com:
The bugs are listed here:
http://www.lua.org/bugs.html
5.2.3 was only released this past December, but 5.2.2 has been out since
2012.
What do you mean by we have a 5.2.1 library for Windows but not a 5.2.3
one? Do you
2014-03-28 16:06 GMT+01:00 Pavel Karneliuk pavel_karnel...@epam.com:
Hello,
At first, thank you all for Wireshark. It is amazing tool!
I found a defect and register Bug
9936https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9936-
epan/follow.c - Incorrect comparing a sequence number
The bugs are listed here:
http://www.lua.org/bugs.html
5.2.3 was only released this past December, but 5.2.2 has been out since 2012.
What do you mean by we have a 5.2.1 library for Windows but not a 5.2.3 one?
Do you mean from some pre-built binary repository somewhere?
-hadriel
On Mar 28,
Yes, I am going to gerrit.
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Pascal Quantin
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 6:57 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Defect in reassembling TCP stream. Bug and
BTW, to answer your question directly, no I don't think it's a big deal if you
only run 5.2.1. The bugs fixed in 5.2.2 were pretty esoteric, and even more so
those fixed in 5.2.3.
FWIW, I use Lua 5.2.1 on my Mac all the time (because MacPorts hasn't updated
their Lua installer to 5.2.3 yet,
(To: Gerald)
Currently the Gerrit diff shows whitespace changes.
Previously, when viewing diffs of SVN commits via the web, whitespace
changes were not shown.
If others agree, is it possible to configure the Gerrit diff to not show
whitespace changes ?
(Or to provide an option ?)
Bill
+1
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Hadriel Kaplan
hadriel.kap...@oracle.comwrote:
Howdy,
Is there any reason not to make wireshark 1.11.x and beyond only use Lua
5.2? Right now the automated builds are getting built with 5.1.
There's very little difference to end users (i.e., older
+1
The Debian packages use Lua since 1.10.2-2 without any problem.
Cheers,
Balint
2014-03-28 15:45 GMT+01:00 Nakayama Kenjiro nakayamakenj...@gmail.com:
+1
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Hadriel Kaplan hadriel.kap...@oracle.com
wrote:
Howdy,
Is there any reason not to make wireshark
Le 28 mars 2014 16:52, Pavel Karneliuk pavel_karnel...@epam.com a écrit
:
Hi Pascal,
thank you for answer. I saw your commits to follow.c and I hoped for your
reply.
450:if( newseq seq[idx] ) {
I think - Yes. It compares sequence numbers.
459: if ( current-data_len new_pos ) {
I am
On Mar 28, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Pascal Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-03-28 16:34 GMT+01:00 Hadriel Kaplan hadriel.kap...@oracle.com:
The bugs are listed here:
http://www.lua.org/bugs.html
5.2.3 was only released this past December, but 5.2.2 has been out since 2012.
What
Khemis Haythem
Adresse: BoitePostale 101 4118, Mednine
GSM : +216 55 69 19 90
E-mail : khemis.hayt...@yahoo.fr
Statut : Élèveingénieur
Spatialité : Géniedes Communications etdesRéseaux
Ecole : Ecole National d'IngénieursdeGabes
hello,
I was just hoping if anyone could provide me with
Start here:
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development
https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=blob;f=doc/README.dissector
https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=blob;f=doc/README.developer
-hadriel
On Mar 28, 2014, at 8:49 PM, khemis haythem
19 matches
Mail list logo
