On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Anil anilkumar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All --
I have done a mistake with submitting code for review.
My initial review is https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/7751
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/7751/1/epan/dissectors/packet-nstrace.c
I fixed the
Hi All --
I have done a mistake with submitting code for review.
My initial review is https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/7751
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/7751/1/epan/dissectors/packet-nstrace.c
I fixed the issues reported there and have checked in the new changes. The
problem is
Since you now have 2 changes submitted, you should abandon one of them (do
it from the web interface), then follow Alexis' suggestion about sqashing
and amending, then push the final revision into the survived change (do it
using the correct change-id, read it from the web interface again).
I
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:15:52AM +0100, Dario Lombardo wrote:
Since you now have 2 changes submitted, you should abandon one of them (do
it from the web interface), then follow Alexis' suggestion about sqashing
and amending, then push the final revision into the survived change (do it
using
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Dario Lombardo dario.lombardo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Since you now have 2 changes submitted, you should abandon one of them (do
it from the web interface), then follow Alexis' suggestion about sqashing
and amending, then push the final revision into the survived
Hi
I can build wireshark successfully (gtk and qt interfaces) on Windows, but
If I want to execute it, he complains that the side-by-side configuration
is not correct.
If I trace the launch with sxstrace, he complains, that the
ProcessorArchitecture is wrong for the target (amd64).
The build is
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Alexis La Goutte
alexis.lagou...@gmail.com wrote:
From local branch ? or remote branch ? (master / master-1.12...)
From local.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Hi all,
I am building a package for Ubuntu, and the debian packages I get as result
are not picking the proper customized version (set in configure.ac), but
what is worse, a custom dissector I wrote is not in the packages.
I did make before doing the packaging and ./wireshark-gtk is as I expect.
Hi Juanjo,
2015-03-25 15:26 GMT+01:00 Juan Jose Martin Carrascosa jua...@rti.com:
Hi all,
I am building a package for Ubuntu, and the debian packages I get as result
are not picking the proper customized version (set in configure.ac), but
what is worse, a custom dissector I wrote is not in
Thanks for the prompt reply Bálint.
So, I assume that what I did for the make build doesn't apply here. Does
anyone know how to modify the cmake build for:
1) add a dissector
2) add files to the package (for instance, a pdf in the root directory)
3) change the version
Any
Well, after doing some awful research...
1) To add the dissector, I edited epan/CMakeLists.txt.
2) To add files to the package, I added my custom files to the same list
that colorfilters is, and it seems it work.
3) It seems the version is controlled in CMakeLists.txt using
Hi,
You could also add it to a CMakeListCustom.txt file see
CMakelistCustom.txt.example you also need a Cmake file in your custom
dissectors file.
Regards
Anders
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Juan Jose Martin
Carrascosa
On 25 March 2015 at 08:17, Roland Knall rkn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I can build wireshark successfully (gtk and qt interfaces) on Windows, but
If I want to execute it, he complains that the side-by-side configuration
is not correct.
If I trace the launch with sxstrace, he complains, that
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:48:38PM +0100, Peter Wu wrote:
| Triggered by a build error due to html2text.py, I have recently started
| with adding Python 3 support to various Python scripts[1][2]. The change
| to html2text.py[1] was tested with Python 2.6, 2.7, 3.2 and 3.4.
|
| The
14 matches
Mail list logo
