2014-04-14 21:09 GMT+02:00 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Apr 14, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org wrote:
On 4/11/14 7:35 PM, mman...@netscape.net wrote:
If a reviewer thinks the current patch is a good start for a feature
(and worthy of current inclusion), is it okay
Hi Gerald All,
2014-04-01 2:41 GMT+02:00 Pascal Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com:
2014-03-31 23:17 GMT+02:00 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org:
On 3/27/14 10:13 PM, Anders Broman wrote:
Hi,
How do we handle backports in the new work flow with git? The submitter
of a patch could help
Hi Eshed,
2014-03-29 20:30 GMT+01:00 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Mar 29, 2014, at 6:10 AM, Eshed Shaham ashdn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I recently found out that the frame_data structure had a minor change in the
1.8 branch between 1.8.8 and 1.8.9:
+1
The Debian packages use Lua since 1.10.2-2 without any problem.
Cheers,
Balint
2014-03-28 15:45 GMT+01:00 Nakayama Kenjiro nakayamakenj...@gmail.com:
+1
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Hadriel Kaplan hadriel.kap...@oracle.com
wrote:
Howdy,
Is there any reason not to make wireshark
2014-03-21 22:24 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi,
2014-03-20 23:11 GMT-01:00 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Mar 20, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Chris Kilgour tec...@whiterocker.com wrote:
On 03/20/2014 01:07 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
If the build system had open access what would
2014-03-22 21:03 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi,
2014-03-22 18:29 GMT-01:00 Anders Broman a.broma...@gmail.com:
Balint's stock icon changes?
Den 22 mar 2014 19:35 skrev Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Mar 22, 2014, at 9:09 AM, Toralf Förster toralf.foers...@gmx.de
2014-03-09 15:43 GMT+01:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
2014-03-09 10:43 GMT+01:00 Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Toralf Förster toralf.foers...@gmx.de
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Switching from gtk-3.8.7
Hi,
2014-03-22 18:29 GMT-01:00 Anders Broman a.broma...@gmail.com:
Balint's stock icon changes?
Den 22 mar 2014 19:35 skrev Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Mar 22, 2014, at 9:09 AM, Toralf Förster toralf.foers...@gmx.de
wrote:
Got this with latest git tree while quitting w/o saving
Hi,
2014-03-20 23:11 GMT-01:00 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Mar 20, 2014, at 2:24 PM, Chris Kilgour tec...@whiterocker.com wrote:
On 03/20/2014 01:07 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
If the build system had open access what would keep someone from
uploading a shell script containing a box full
2014-03-11 7:29 GMT+01:00 Anders Broman a.bro...@bredband.net:
Hi,
stock_icons.c:176: error: 'GTK_STOCK_CAPS_LOCK_WARNING' undeclared here (not
in a function) stock_icons.c:242: error: 'GTK_STOCK_PAGE_SETUP' undeclared
here (not in a function) stock_icons.c:246: error: 'GTK_STOCK_PRINT_ERROR'
2014-03-11 15:00 GMT+01:00 Martin Mathieson martin.r.mathie...@googlemail.com:
I too am looking forward to seeing this.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 03/08/14 04:46, Anders Broman wrote:
Pascal Quantin skrev 2014-03-08 09:56:
Le
2014-03-09 10:43 GMT+01:00 Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Toralf Förster toralf.foers...@gmx.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Switching from gtk-3.8.7 to gtp-3.10.7 I do get with current wireshark git
tree at a stable 32
2014-02-26 10:30 GMT+01:00 Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 09:51:13AM +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote:
I sent the sample workflow for two reasons:
1) Receive feedback whether I did something stupid (aka newbie error)
2) Start creating a little bit of help for newbies
Attached
2014-02-26 18:19 GMT+01:00 Hadriel Kaplan hadriel.kap...@oracle.com:
On Feb 26, 2014, at 3:51 AM, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:39:37PM -0500, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
- avoiding merging local branches because a merge commit won't have the
change-id and
-Basics-Undoing-Things
Cheers,
Balint
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
2014-02-26 10:30 GMT+01:00 Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 09:51:13AM +0100, Joerg Mayer wrote:
I sent the sample workflow for two reasons:
1) Receive
2014-02-26 9:22 GMT+01:00 Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 08:57:36PM -0500, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:44 PM, Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm all for consolidating the above information - we just need to
decide which of the many places to
Hi Gerald,
2014-02-21 1:20 GMT+01:00 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org:
...
For the time being I've redirected the following URL prefixes to Gerrit:
http://anongit.wireshark.org/git
http://code.wireshark.org/git
https://code.wireshark.org/git
I'm able to fetch using a couple of old test
Hi All Gerald,
2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster toralf.foers...@gmx.de wrote:
As a follower of the wireshark code I'm wondering if
https://code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark or
https://code.wireshark.org/git/wireshark is
2014-02-20 14:36 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Hi All Gerald,
2014-02-01 23:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Toralf Förster toralf.foers...@gmx.de
wrote
Hi,
2014-02-04 Pascal Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com:
2014-02-04 Graham Bloice graham.blo...@trihedral.com:
On 4 February 2014 11:18, Pascal Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-02-04 Graham Bloice graham.blo...@trihedral.com:
On 3 February 2014 22:50, Pascal Quantin
Hi,
2014-02-04 Pascal Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com:
2014-02-04 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi,
2014-02-04 Pascal Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com:
2014-02-04 Graham Bloice graham.blo...@trihedral.com:
On 4 February 2014 11:18, Pascal Quantin pascal.quan
Hi Evan,
2014-01-30 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org wrote:
On 1/30/14 6:17 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
Hi,
2014-01-30 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
I believe the simpler answer is that the submit type has been set to
Merge
Hi Hadriel,
2014-01-31 Hadriel Kaplan hadriel.kap...@oracle.com:
In the past with svn, when we found a bug caused by a previous code change,
we used the revision number in bugzilla comments with a leading ‘r’, like
‘r12345’. This would auto-create a very convenient url link in bugzilla to
Hi,
2014-01-30 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
I believe the simpler answer is that the submit type has been set to Merge
If Necessary which means if changes are not submitted exactly on top of the
change they were authored on, Gerrit will produce a merge automatically.
I suggested using Cherry
Please don't list bugs in topic names, reserve the fist line for the
short summary.
Listing bugs at the end of the commit message like below is a better
practice and also helps processing the commit messages with standard
tools.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GitCommitMessages :
The 'bug' line
2014-01-30 Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
Please don't list bugs in topic names, reserve the fist line for the
short summary.
Listing bugs at the end of the commit message like below is a better
2014-01-30 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org:
On 1/28/14 5:57 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
Hi,
2014-01-28 Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:14:50PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
It is in the upper right corner.
The links are pretty small. You are not the first who missed
Hi Gerald,
2014-01-24 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org:
After Tuesday's migration I plan on adding the following tags. This
should make it easier to use 'git describe' to generate version numbers
and provide a consistent tag history in our current branches.
Most of those git commits are
Hi Jörg,
It is in the upper right corner.
The links are pretty small. You are not the first who missed them. :-)
Cheers,
Balint
2014-01-28 Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de:
Looks like I'm blind. Where do I create the account?
Thanks
Jörg
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:28:08PM -0500, Evan Huus
Hi,
2014-01-28 Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:14:50PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
It is in the upper right corner.
The links are pretty small. You are not the first who missed them. :-)
Can you please provide the URL? If the URL is
https://code.wireshark.org/review
Hi Evan,
2014/1/15 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
I have created an account and added an SSH key, but I am getting
Permission denied (publickey) when trying to clone. Is it working
for anyone else?
After I set my username, it worked fine. Maybe you missed it like me
for the first time. :-)
On
2014/1/13 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Jan 12, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
IMO it does not have to support Debian packages.
The best practice (and Debian's policy) is calling CMake from
debian/rules, not the other way around.
As long as switching from
2014/1/13 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Jan 13, 2014, at 1:05 PM, Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com
wrote:
Missing also make dist-* (gzip, bzip...) family in CMake
Yes - we need a way of releasing the source to a particular version, for the
benefit of third parties making
2014/1/13 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Jan 12, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote:
It allows the compilation with capabilities (that's what I use), but right
now
the installation process has neither suid nor setcap support.
Does it really make sense to add this? If
Hi,
2013/12/13 Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
2013/12/9 Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:38:08PM +0100, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
I plan to add -Wdocumentation [1
cmake ...
make -C asn1/isdn-sup/
generated it for me in asn1/isdn-sup/
Cheers,
Balint
2013/12/13 Christopher Maynard christopher.mayn...@gtech.com:
In asn1/isdn-sup/packet-isdn-sup-template.c at line 110, there is:
#include packet-isdn-sup-table31.c
I'm unable to locate this file. Can
2013/12/9 Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:38:08PM +0100, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
I plan to add -Wdocumentation [1] by default to Wireshark (when build with
Clang).
I have already fix in trunk the documentation.
The major issue to add -Wdocumentation is other library
on any other sides.
2013/6/13 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi All,
Tarnyko kindly sent me an update on the progress of providing an
official GTK+3 bundle on Windows.
I'm not working on Windows nowadays, but I provide Wireshark packages
in Debian unstable built with GTK+3
which work
2013/11/25 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Nov 25, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
At least we (you) found a real problem by temporarily enabling the
broken -ftrapv. :-)
...with a compiler that actually does something with it. Hopefully the GCC
folks
2013/11/25 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Nov 24, 2013, at 5:37 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
I tried to trigger a crash using GCC and -ftrapv without success while
the clang-compiled binary crashed as expected:
Reproduced with clang on (x86-64) OS X.
The problem
2013/11/25 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Nov 24, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
I've removed -ftrapv; we'll see what that does.
That fixed it.
Either Lemon is explicitly depending on wrap-around on signed integer
overflow, or implicitly depending on a lack of
2013/11/3 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
It appears to be licensed under GPLv3 only, which makes it
incompatible for us to include.
It seems to be included only because links/lynx didn't appear to work
a while ago when building under WIndows. If that is no longer true
then I think we can just
Hi Graham,
2013/10/12 Graham Bloice graham.blo...@trihedral.com:
On 11 October 2013 16:09, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote:
...
There are the dumpabi projects that I'm not sure are needed for win32;
dumpabi, dumpabi-libwireshark, dumpabi-libwiretap, dumpabi-libwsutil.
I think those targets
Hi Jörg,
2013/10/11 Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de:
Another milestone hit:
- Win 32bit: The following executables build and run from the build directory
(as well as capture if they should be able to). *: Acutally tested
$ ls *exe
capinfos.exe* dumpcap.exe mergecap.exe randpkt.exe
Hi,
2013/10/10 Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 05:02:51AM +, rbal...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=52484
User: rbalint
Date: 2013/10/10 05:02 AM
Log:
Fix using fop from CMake
Last time I tried (~1 week
Hi Gerald,
2013/10/8 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org:
I've scheduled the release of 1.11.0 for next Tuesday, October 15.
Corrections and additions for the release notes are welcome.
Unfortunately the transitional state of our UI will be reflected in the
release packages:
Windows 32-bit:
Hi Guy,
2013/10/9 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:21 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Building Wireshark already needs way more tools than just make and a C
compiler.
Perhaps we should fix that, so that the release tarball includes all
generated source
2013/10/7 Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 04:27:50PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote:
Hello,
Matthieu raised an issue that I've seen with asn2wrs generated dissectors
too, just not to the extent of the pidl
Hi David,
2013/10/3 David Arnold dav...@pobox.com:
Hi all,
I'm seeing some issues compiling trunk against Gtk-3.10. Specifically, the
GTK_STOCK_* icon macros and GtkAction type have now been deprecated, and
their headers moved to the deprecated subdirectory.
Should I be moving to Qt?
Hi All,
2013/9/30 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Jakub Zawadzki
darkjames...@darkjames.pl wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 05:35:59PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Jakub Zawadzki
darkjames...@darkjames.pl wrote:
But back to topic
2013/9/17 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
On 2013-09-17, at 8:45 PM, jma...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=52129
User: jmayer
Date: 2013/09/17 01:45 PM
Log:
Fix remaining dependencides for -exp.cnf files.
Does this mean it might finally
Could they analyze perf results or run git bisect to find the point
when the degradation started?
Cheers,
Balint
2013/9/12 Anders Broman anders.bro...@ericsson.com:
Hi,
I recently supplied some people with an internal build from recent trunk and
got complaints on performance. Switching back
Hi,
2013/8/23 Anders Broman a.bro...@bredband.net:
Bálint Réczey skrev 2013-08-22 23:02:
...
Regarding Wireshark I would prefer suggesting echo 1
/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable in the documentation
instead of adding code to enable JIT.
There may be good reasons for not enabling
(a.bro...@bredband.net):
Bálint Réczey skrev 2013-08-22 23:02:
Hi,
I would be happier if the applications I run did not change kernel
configuration without my consent.
I see your point...
Regarding Wireshark I would prefer suggesting echo 1
/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
2013/8/23 Anders Broman anders.bro...@ericsson.com:
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Bálint Réczey
Sent: den 23 augusti 2013 12:59
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark
2013/8/23 Anders Broman anders.bro...@ericsson.com:
-Original Message-
From: rbal...@gmail.com [mailto:rbal...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Bálint Réczey
Sent: den 23 augusti 2013 14:23
To: Anders Broman
Cc: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Enabling
Hi,
I would be happier if the applications I run did not change kernel
configuration without my consent.
Regarding Wireshark I would prefer suggesting echo 1
/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable in the documentation
instead of adding code to enable JIT.
There may be good reasons for not enabling
Hi,
2013/8/12 Alexis La Goutte alexis.lagou...@gmail.com:
Hi,
it is now possible to build wireshark with clang (CC=clang ./configure
make) (i fix last issue last week end).
Great news!
I will try the ASAN feature (
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html )
ASAN is also ported
Hi Evan,
2013/8/13 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Alexis La Goutte
alexis.lagou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
it is now possible to build wireshark with clang (CC=clang ./configure
make) (i fix last issue last week end).
I will try the ASAN feature (
Hi Evan,
2013/8/13 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Alexis La Goutte
alexis.lagou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
Hi
2013/7/30 Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:42:02PM +0200, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 01:25:41PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jul 29, 2013, at 1:12 PM, Jakub Zawadzki darkjames...@darkjames.pl
wrote:
Is anyone attached to hf_ variables? ;)
2013/8/1 Graham Bloice graham.blo...@trihedral.com:
On 31 July 2013 22:42, Jakub Zawadzki darkjames...@darkjames.pl wrote:
SNIP
--- 9d519b5659aa8c0c4aa984bc6169909eb31be7d6_2.c2013-07-31
22:50:46.144101741 +0200
+++ 9d519b5659aa8c0c4aa984bc6169909eb31be7d6_1.c2013-07-31
Hi,
2013/7/23 Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de:
Hello,
how about making gtk3 the default over gtk2 when building Wireshark? Just
to be clear: I only want to reverse the build defaults between gtk2 and 3.
Hopefully it will get much more testing that way, so it is up to prime time
for the next
Hi Guy,
2013/7/15 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Jul 15, 2013, at 6:57 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
I think there is no clear preference.
sensible-pager and sensible-editor are mentioned [1] in Debian Policy
which gives direction to maintainers, but sensible browser
Hi Marc,
2013/6/28 Marc Petit-Huguenin m...@petit-huguenin.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/28/2013 07:21 AM, Jeff Morriss wrote:
On 06/22/13 06:47, Bálint Réczey wrote:
Hi All,
2013/6/21 Marc Petit-Huguenin m...@petit-huguenin.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
Hi Michael,
2013/6/25 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi Michael,
2013/6/24 Michael Tuexen michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de:
...
The current process puts responsibility on the core developer who
commits a change. Personally, I don't think it is bad if this breaks
the build on some
Hi Michael,
2013/6/24 Michael Tuexen michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de:
...
The current process puts responsibility on the core developer who
commits a change. Personally, I don't think it is bad if this breaks
the build on some buildbot, I only this it is bad if the committer
doesn't care.
Hi Michael,
2013/6/24 Michael Tuexen michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de:
On Jun 23, 2013, at 8:58 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Hi,
2013/6/22 Marc Petit-Huguenin m...@petit-huguenin.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/22/2013 09:43 AM, Bálint Réczey
Hi,
2013/6/22 Marc Petit-Huguenin m...@petit-huguenin.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/22/2013 09:43 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
Hi Marc,
2013/6/22 Marc Petit-Huguenin m...@petit-huguenin.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 06/22/2013 03:47 AM
Hi All,
2013/6/21 Marc Petit-Huguenin m...@petit-huguenin.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/20/2013 04:52 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin m...@petit-huguenin.org
wrote:
On 06/20/2013 02:17 PM, Gerald Combs wrote:
Hi Martin,
2013/6/22 Martin Kaiser li...@kaiser.cx:
Thus wrote Bálint Réczey (bal...@balintreczey.hu):
I have started describing a Gerrit based workflow which IMO would fit
to the project at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow .
Please check it and share your opinion.
would
Hi Marc,
2013/6/22 Marc Petit-Huguenin m...@petit-huguenin.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/22/2013 03:47 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
Hi All,
2013/6/21 Marc Petit-Huguenin m...@petit-huguenin.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 06/20/2013 04:52
Hi All,
Tarnyko kindly sent me an update on the progress of providing an
official GTK+3 bundle on Windows.
I'm not working on Windows nowadays, but I provide Wireshark packages
in Debian unstable built with GTK+3
which work almost perfectly.
If you are interested in running Wireshark with GTK+3
2013/4/22 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org:
On 4/22/13 12:21 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:54:14PM +, ger...@wireshark.org wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=47393
User: gerald
Date: 2013/01/31 10:54 AM
Log:
Use the name
Thanks Gisle,
I'll commit this soon.
Cheers,
Balint
2013/3/15 Gisle Vanem gva...@broadpark.no:
I'm having a problem compiling the *non* generated easy_codec_plugin.c. The
message from MSVC is:
error C2491: 'version' : definition of dllimport data not allowed
for the line:
-gtk2,
wireshark-gtk3 or wireshark-qt as appropriate.
I the first round (at least for 1.10.x) I think we could keep the name
of the GTK version
'wireshark' since the Qt version is far from feature-complete.
Cheers,
Balint
Evan
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Bálint Réczey bal
Hi,
I would like to suggest renaming the relatively new qtshark binary to
wireshark-qt.
I believe wireshark-qt would align better with the practice of
providing the very same software
for different UI toolkits with the same name postfixed by the UI toolkit name.
Cheers,
Balint
-gtk2,
wireshark-gtk3 or wireshark-qt as appropriate.
With CMake we can build both together and the qt version is called qtshark.
I plan converting the Debian package to use CMake to ship both and simplify
the build process.
Cheers,
Balint
Evan
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Bálint Réczey
in the export behavior. I checked in
your changes in r48170 along with a workaround to reset the export
definitions. It's clunkier than I would like but Visual C++ is happier now.
On 3/7/13 8:23 AM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
If no one objects I commit those tomorrow.
Cheers,
Balint
2013/3/7 Bálint
I think the attached patches would make it be a bit less hack-ish.
Cheers,
Balint
2013/3/7 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org:
-DENABLE_STATIC instead of -DWS_BUILD_DLL worked on my machine. Checked
in in r48158.
On 3/6/13 8:52 AM, Christopher Maynard wrote:
Pascal Quantin pascal.quantin@...
If no one objects I commit those tomorrow.
Cheers,
Balint
2013/3/7 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
I think the attached patches would make it be a bit less hack-ish.
Cheers,
Balint
2013/3/7 Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org:
-DENABLE_STATIC instead of -DWS_BUILD_DLL worked on my
are exported in builds using cc and Solaris Studio.
I tried to fix that using but did not succeed. If someone works with
those tools
please try to fix that properly.
Cheers,
Balint
2013/2/27 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi Guy,
2013/2/27 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Feb 26, 2013
Hi Anders,
I have fixed it now, I just wanted to run a full build to test fixing distcheck.
Cheers,
Balint
2013/2/28 Anders Broman anders.bro...@ericsson.com:
Hi,
Shouldn't ws_symbol_export.h be added to makefile.common ?
Regards
Anders
-Original Message-
From:
The commit converting libwiretap broke the Windows builds.
I'm fixing the symbol exporting related build problems right now, but
it seems my change
also triggered additional compile-time checks which revealed existing errors.
Cheers,
Balint
2013/2/28 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi
Hi Gisle,
2013/2/27 Gisle Vanem gva...@broadpark.no:
Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
I have created the attached patch to control symbol visibility using
C defines instead of .def and .sym files. It is expected to work on every
platform and every build system we support, but I
2013/2/27 Dirk Jagdmann d...@cubic.org:
I have tested it using autotools and CMake, but I could not give it a try
on
Windows or OS X. If you have some time and access to those platform
please test the patch.
I tested on OsX and it seems to work. I could compile Wireshark and run it.
Thanks!
Hi Guy,
2013/2/27 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Feb 26, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Exporting all symbols when using more exotic compilers should not be and
issue,
because plugins used on such exotic systems are probably compiled with
GCC = 4.0, LLVM
Hi,
2013/2/27 Jeff Morriss jeff.morriss...@gmail.com:
Bálint Réczey wrote:
2013/2/26 Bill Meier wme...@newsguy.com:
On 2/26/2013 5:11 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2013/2/26 Pascal Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com:
...
Thank you! If no one opposes I'll commit the patch on Thursday
Hi,
I have created the attached patch to control symbol visibility using
C defines instead of .def and .sym files. It is expected to work on every
platform and every build system we support, but I did not want to
commit it without discussing the direction.
I have tested it using autotools and
Hi Guy,
2013/2/26 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Feb 26, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
I have created the attached patch to control symbol visibility using
C defines instead of .def and .sym files.
You might want to use comments on #else and #endif
2013/2/26 Pascal Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com:
...
Hi Balint,
I just tried your patch on my Win32 box (MSVC2010) and it seems to be
working fine: symbols exported by libwsutil.dll are the same before and
after the patch.
Regards,
Pascal.
Hi Pascal,
Thank you! If no one opposes I'll
2013/2/26 Jakub Zawadzki darkjames...@darkjames.pl:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:46:28PM +0100, Bálint Réczey wrote:
If you have concerns or comments, please share them. :-)
Some (older) compilers don't support -fvisibility=hidden can you add test
if this option is accepted by compiler?
Sure
2013/2/26 Bill Meier wme...@newsguy.com:
On 2/26/2013 5:11 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
2013/2/26 Pascal Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com:
...
Thank you! If no one opposes I'll commit the patch on Thursday and
then start converting the remaining libs.
It sounds like the change
Hi Paul,
2013/2/17 Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
Unfortunately our efforts are severely impacted by the lack of official
GTK+
installers for Windows and OS X and this uncertainty was a major reason
2013/2/17 Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
Hi Paul,
2013/2/17 Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
Unfortunately
On 12/30/2012 10:40 AM, Niklas Gürtler wrote:
because i wasn't really able to find a nice Installation package for
Gtk+3 on Windows, i have made one.
Thanks for putting in the effort on that. I will have to try it.
Damon Register
Dear GTK+ Developers,
Thank you for all the hard
2013/2/15 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Feb 14, 2013, at 9:09 PM, Hadriel Kaplan hkap...@acmepacket.com wrote:
Provide a way for Wireshark to automatically check-for and optionally
auto-retrieve the most recent version from wireshark's site/mirrors,
For which operating systems?
The
Why do we need to show system information in Wireshark which is
available in system specific tools which are better suited for this
task?
Cheers,
Balint
2013/2/6 Anders Broman anders.bro...@ericsson.com:
Hi,
The included patch works on Ubuntu 64 bits but I guess it needs to be
protected with
Hi All,
2013/2/4 Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Feb 3, 2013, at 4:32 PM, Evan Huus eapa...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't apt-get build-dep wireshark a much easier way of doing the same
thing?
Would that install tools needed to
2013/2/4 Guy Harris g...@alum.mit.edu:
On Feb 3, 2013, at 4:29 PM, g...@wireshark.org wrote:
Try creating a script for Debian and derivatives that will grab the
packages necessary for Wireshark development, using apt-get.
Maybe it should parse the Build-Depends: line in debian/control and
101 - 200 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
