From: Wireshark-dev On Behalf Of Maynard,
Chris
Sent: den 18 september 2018 15:55
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Unhandled exception
>This particular crash with transum didn’t occur just by launching Wireshark
>though, but only when reading a c
...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of
Anders Broman
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 9:42 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Unhandled exception
Hi,
At the very least we should have a test step activating all protocols and
starting the application.
As they are disabled
2018 15:36
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Unhandled exception
Thanks.
Should the fuzz tester(s) enable all dissectors by default? If I “enable all
protocols”, then currently the enabled_protos file lists these 3: prp, stcsig
and transum.
- Chris
From
, September 18, 2018 4:26 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Unhandled exception
https://code.wireshark.org/review/c/29715/
Cheers,
Pascal.
Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 10:22, Pascal Quantin
mailto:pascal.quan...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
I'm uploading a
: [Wireshark-dev] Unhandled exception
Hi,
Perhaps filter names referenced in other dissectors should be a define in a
common .h file to make it obvious that the name must be changed in more than
one place. Solving part of the problem.
Then TRANSNUM should check for -1 I suppose and perhaps my trouble
.cn_call_id" },
{ -1, "dcerpc.cn_ctx_id" },
{ -1, "dns.id<http://dns.id>"},
};
Regards
Anders
-Original Message-
From: Wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org>>
On Behalf Of João Valverde
Sent: den 18 september 2018 10:10
To: wiresha
;>> { -1, "udp.dstport" },
>>> { -1, "udp.stream" },
>>> { -1, "udp.length" },
>>>
>>> { -1, "ssl.record.content_type" },
>>>
>>> { -1, "tds.type" },
>>> { -1, "
{ -1, "smb.mid" },
>>
>> { -1, "smb2.sesid" },
>> { -1, "smb2.msg_id" },
>> { -1, "smb2.cmd" },
>>
>> { -1, "dcerpc.ver" },
>> { -1, "dcerpc.pkt_type" },
>> { -1, &qu
gth" },
>
> { -1, "smb.mid" },
>
> { -1, "smb2.sesid" },
> { -1, "smb2.msg_id" },
> { -1, "smb2.cmd" },
>
> { -1, "dcerpc.ver" },
> { -1, "dcerpc.pkt_type" },
> { -1, "dcerpc.cn
esid" },
{ -1, "smb2.msg_id" },
{ -1, "smb2.cmd" },
{ -1, "dcerpc.ver" },
{ -1, "dcerpc.pkt_type" },
{ -1, "dcerpc.cn_call_id" },
{ -1, "dcerpc.cn_ctx_id" },
{ -1, "dns.id"},
};
Regards
Anders
-
", group=1, code=6)
Thanks.
- Chris
-Original Message-
From: Wireshark-dev [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of
Richard Sharpe
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 4:22 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-d
v-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of
Richard Sharpe
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 4:22 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Unhandled exception
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is the property of International Game
Technology PLC and/or its subsi
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Maynard, Chris
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently I’ve begun seeing the following unhandled exception with master
> when loading any capture file or attempting to capture on any interface – at
> least that I tried, but I haven’t found any capture file or capture
>
Hello,
Recently I've begun seeing the following unhandled exception with master when
loading any capture file or attempting to capture on any interface - at least
that I tried, but I haven't found any capture file or capture interface where
this doesn't happen now:
Unhandled exception
Hi,
Shouldn't smi_modules_uat and smi_paths_uat be listed as 'DATA' items in
libwireshark.def. Or is there something with WS_IMPORT? I don't really
know how this stuff works in the Win32 domain.
Thanx,
Jaap
Andrew Hood wrote:
SVN at 24225
Windows XP Pro SP2
M$ Visual Studio 8.0
uat_t* uat_get_table_by_name(const char* name) {
guint i;
for (i=0; i all_uats-len; i++) {
if ( g_strequal((g_ptr_array_index(all_uats,i))-name,name) ) {
return (g_ptr_array_index(all_uats,i));
}
}
Hi,
I'm missing the point here. Is this a code snippet returning NULL that
causes the failure? Is it a fix? For what? Maybe this should be filed in
bugzilla and handled the regular way.
Thanx,
Jaap
Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
uat_t* uat_get_table_by_name(const char* name) {
guint i;
Sorry,
I thought I wrote that...
Instead of trying to export the variables that point to the uats we
should get the pointer by other means. The code snipplet was the means
for that.
L
On Jan 30, 2008 10:40 PM, Jaap Keuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm missing the point here. Is this a
Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
Sorry,
I thought I wrote that...
Instead of trying to export the variables that point to the uats we
should get the pointer by other means. The code snipplet was the means
for that.
This works:
In epan/libwireshark.def make smi_modules_uat and smi_paths_uat DATA
as
2008/1/30, Luis EG Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Instead of trying to export the variables that point to the uats we
should get the pointer by other means. The code snipplet was the means
for that.
I have tried adding your function to uat.c and use this in nameres_prefs.c.
But I'm currently
Seems to be working ok on win32 with r24229 :)
--
Stig Bjørlykke
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
21 matches
Mail list logo
