On 1/8/07, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/4/07, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/3/07, Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Martin Mathieson wrote:
> > >
> > > > For the more general problem, I see 2 possible solutions:
> > > > (1) have both signed and
On 1/4/07, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/3/07, Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Mathieson wrote:
>
> > For the more general problem, I see 2 possible solutions:
> > (1) have both signed and values in the union, and use the appropriate
> > signed or unsigned parts
On 1/3/07, Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Mathieson wrote:
> For the more general problem, I see 2 possible solutions:
> (1) have both signed and values in the union, and use the appropriate
> signed or unsigned parts of the union in the comparison functions
> (2) leave the union a
Martin Mathieson wrote:
> For the more general problem, I see 2 possible solutions:
> (1) have both signed and values in the union, and use the appropriate
> signed or unsigned parts of the union in the comparison functions
> (2) leave the union as it is with unsigned members, cast values in all
>
Hi,
While looking at bug 1279 (Negative values for RTCP round trip delay
cannot be stored in guint32) I noticed that I couldn't use filter
expressions using < and negative numbers with an FT_INT32 field. The
problem seems to be that:
- fvalue_t.value.integer is a guint32
- the current less-than f
