Thanks Andreas
I've installed your build on my MacBook Pro and I'm seeing local
traffic on 'en1', and broadcasts on 'wlt1', but no other network
else. The config for en1 is set to promiscuous, and checking
'ifconfig en1' reveals that the PROMISC flag is set -- it just
doesn't seem to mak
the wireless issue on the MacBook Pro have been solved
You need an updated libpcap version.
the installer I put at http://www.finkconsulting.com/page7 has this
fix.
On 20.03.2007, at 05:30, David Schweinsberg wrote:
Hi
I was hoping for a recommendation for the best wireless card to use
w
Hi
I was hoping for a recommendation for the best wireless card to use
with Wireshark on Linux. I've looked through the various cards and
chipsets on the wireless wiki section, but there seems to be so clear
consensus as to which is the best option.
Alternatively, I have a MacBookPro which
For that kind of use you probably prefer ntop over wireshark.
http://www.ntop.org
On 3/19/07, Abhishek Chavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> any format where the data can be seen stored and like i leave wireshark to
> capture at night and come the next day to see the data to actually know
> amount
On Mar 19, 2007, at 11:52 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
> Another possibility would be a libpcap-based program to read a
> RouterOS
> capture and write out a valid radiotap capture, adding the padding to
> the RouterOS radiotap header.
...which would let *any* program that handles valid radiotap heade
any format where the data can be seen stored and like i leave wireshark to
capture at night and come the next day to see the data to actually know
amount of data transferred
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wiresh
Guy Harris wrote:
> I have no interest in breaking the radiotap dissector by making it
> assume no padding. If there's a *reliable* mechanism for detecting
> RouterOS's broken radiotap header, I'd be willing to accept a patch from
> somebody for that, but I don't want to lose any ability to re
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 12:27:17PM +0530, Abhishek Chavan wrote:
> ya it can be seen in tht but i need to show in a proper format any
> idea??
What format do you need?
Steve
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.w
Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote:
> Hi, i'm a new Wireshark user, old time Ethereal user.
Same program, just a different name.
> I noticed Wireshark cannot read properly the capture files captured by
> routeros (www.mikrotik.com).
Either that, or RouterOS isn't properly *writing* the capture files.
>
Hi, i'm a new Wireshark user, old time Ethereal user.
I noticed Wireshark cannot read properly the capture files captured by
routeros (www.mikrotik.com). It is only the 'radiotap header' that
displays incorrectly.
The packets' radiotap header shows:
Header revision: 0
Header pad: 0
Header lenght:
10 matches
Mail list logo
