IMF Loans Total $41.8 Billion in November, ‘Busiest’ Month Ever

2008-11-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Comments: from
http://www.rgemonitor.com

IMF's monthly disbursements record of $26.6b in 2002, according to
records that date back to 1984 was beated in Nov-2008 when a total of
$41.8b in loans were agreed by the fund. The largest bailout in IMF
history was the September 2002 approval of $30.4b for Brazil. South
Korea got $21b in December 1997, in the midst of the Asian financial
crisis of that year in which Indonesia received $11.2b and Thailand
got $4b

The institution is basically providing funds through two different
ways. A less conditional borrowing facility (SLF) (1) in which
countries can borrow up to 5 times their quota, with a three month
duration and, borrowing for countries in need of longer term programs,
which will likely be subject to more specific conditions. However, the
IMF may be less likely to dictate policies than in the past.

On the IMF's Role:

Asia-Europe summit Oct 24/25 suggests IMF play a major role in
providing funds to emerging markets and in reforming the international
financial system
Rogoff: it would be a terrible mistake simply to super-size the IMF in
its current guise by greatly scaling up its lending facilities, as
many propose. Rather, the IMF's role, even in the current crisis,
should be sharpened as an interlocutor between lenders and developing
country borrowers, rather than simply as a replacement for all other
loan sources

Martin Wolf: It is not only possible but necessary to change the
global architecture to reflect changing economic weights. The world
must also give the IMF more financial resources in support of its new
short-term lending facility

Jeffrey Frankel: Bill Rhodes has proposed that the Fund facilitate
expansion of currency swap arrangements, to allow emerging markets to
have the same access that has been made available to developing
countries; and that it should try to resurrect a lending facility
known as Contingent Credit Lines. The Fund would have to turn to newly-
wealthy countries like China to help finance such new facilities and
programs. Michael Bordo and Harold James have suggested that the Fund
could manage reserve assets of the new surplus countries; but it is
not clear why the latter should want it to.

Economist: IMF remains the institution most suited to dealing with
such crises. It has $255 billion in uncommitted usable resources and
the ability to elicit funds from countries that may be reluctant to
act on their own—as with the Japanese and Nordic contributions to the
Iceland package. The IMF-led route is better for troubled countries
than making ad hoc approaches to others

Other countries might turn to regional level financing such as those
promoted by the IDB for Latin American countries or an Asian crisis
fund. Overall, Asian countries are less likely to face balance of
payments crises than those in EMEA, but Indonesia may get standby
loans from the World Bank and ADB in 2009

BNY: IMF Head, Dominique Strauss Kahn notes that no country is immune
to the crisis and that the IMF is willing to provide financial
assistance not only to emerging markets, but also Western countries.
Japanese Finance Minister Nakagawa suggested Japan might provide funds
to support such efforts

(1) Short Lending Facility.

Peace and best wishes.

Xi

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087sid=aSCYZI5nYCskrefer=home
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
World-thread group.
To post to this group, send email to world-thread@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/world-thread?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Life

2008-11-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Congratulations (Mercury)

Do not feel guilty. It is your money, you do not borrow it, why to
feel guilty if you spend your money as you want? My perspective is
life is to enjoy it according to our posibilities, what we really can
afford, not beyond it.

I should spend more, but I still save a lot. I have plans for the near
future and I have to save money to make them real. That is ok although
I should save less.

Peace and best wishes.

Xi

On Nov 26, 3:50 am, Mercury.Sailor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I LOVE shopping, I haven't really done any shopping all year, But damn
 have I been making up for it and enjoying every second of it

 Yesterday I spoke to the wife of a famous scientist over the
 telephone, They live in New Mexico, The husband Sterling C*lgate works
 at The Los Alamos National Laboratory, Very intelligent couple. Well,
 during our conversation the wife started talking to me about old age
 and how when we get older and our bodies don't do what we would like
 to do, That's when you really learn to appreciate the smaller things
 in life such as walking, hiking, appreciating the beautiful
 sunsets. I just let her talk and I listened, Than I thought about it
 for a long time, Damn I learned to appreciate all of these things when
 I was in my early 20's. I'm glad I learn these important lessons at
 such an early age in life, When I go hiking or skiing, walking or just
 out for a ride on the back of my husbands motorcycle, That's when I
 appreciate how great life is and its here today and could be gone
 tomorrow.

 I know the economy isn't all that great and I shouldn't be out having
 such a great time spending my money like a drunken U.S President, But
 hey, Its my guilty pleasure and its Christmas time! So, I am simply
 having a wonderful Christmas shopping time!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
World-thread group.
To post to this group, send email to world-thread@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/world-thread?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



WHY ECONOMIC CRISIS ACTION PLANS ARE INADEQUATE

2008-11-26 Thread Morpheal

WHY ECONOMIC CRISIS ACTION PLANS ARE INADEQUATE

Economic crisis action plans in most nations do not go far enough, nor
do they show indications of moving ahead fast enough. There is a
reluctance, based on belief in the free enterprise, free market,
capitalist system being an adequately self correcting process. This is
driven by the false belief in human nature, which is based on the
dialectic of good and evil. Largely that dialectic argument is the
argument whether people are essentially good or evil by their inherent
nature. With the end of the Cold War, the Capitalist, American led,
argument won out and came out on top, as a consequence of that
conflict being won, not as a result of convincing rational
consideration of scientific facts. Since then the tendency has been to
believe America in this regard, as in many other matters. We now see
how high a price American Cold War victory brings, in purely
ideological terms. Unopposed, the often baseless beliefs, of a nation
acknowledged as economic “superpower”, become the world’s economic
religion. Science can settle the question of good or evil nature. It
is neither. The dispute was a Cold War illusion, meant to increase the
hatred and conflict between two warring sides. Of course education
becomes education for war, not peace. The false ideas are taught,
regardless of science, to maintain conflict at its maximum level. That
is the monstrous legacy we are seeing today. We see what are
unscientific, irrational, often baseless beliefs, held by one side in
a military and propaganda oriented conflict, continuing to bring ruin
and destruction. In war the ability to question propagandized beliefs
is severely impaired if not totally destroyed. In victory of one side
against another that ability does not return easily if at all. Not
until another opponent wins, or until events prove it incontrovertibly
wrong despite the deeply inculcated blind reluctance to accept that
fact.  War propaganda, ideological foundations for war, are most
similar to religion. Reason has little role in it. The truth is always
the first casualty. In the current economic crisis the truth, in that
regard, is still on the coroner’s table, awaiting autopsy results, but
those are being suppressed by those responsible for the cause of
death.

(We need not go into how religion and economics have become
intertwined and how religious systems typically deal with issues of
belief and proof. That is a worthwhile subject to explore, but far too
complex. Let us simply say that religiosity in economics has been and
remains a mainstay of both capitalist and communist systems as they
manifest during the Cold War and as Capitalism continues today. A true
science of economics, and the purely rational regulation of economic
systems is one of the victims. We might add that the American position
in the dialectic with communism, distorted and forced the communist
and socialist positions into extremes of opposition to capitalist
economics due to the extremism of the American led side. In war that
is to be expected. You dehumanize and discredit your enemy,
exaggerating the differences, to enable conflict, including killing
“them”. True economic dialogue and rational decisions are not served
by warfare.)

American led globalization failed to recognize that investment abroad,
in hopes of quick big profit, does not provide for and build a good
society at home. We are referring to unregulated, free market, free
enterprise, globalization where the profit motive proves to be the
only governing motive. At least the belief in quicker, larger,
profits. Forgetting that the capital to gain those profits, taking on
the risk, is no longer invested in the society from where it was
generated. It is now invested elsewhere. The portion of the economic
pie that was to have benefitted society at home simply isn’t there
anymore.

Neither is the business tax base that existed previously. This is a
very important point. You then have a massive erosion of traditional
tax revenues from various municipal and state coffers and ultimately
from the national purse. This growing failure of government revenue
generation leads to bankruptcy of governments. They can no longer pick
up the shortfall in terms of that portion of the economic pie that
needed to go back into benefitting local society. The spiral of
deterioration simply becomes worse as budgets are increasingly cut to
save taxpayer dollars for both political gain and to avoid losing
remaining enterprises.

In a completely free enterprise, free market, system, enterprises that
find that their costs, including taxation, are rising, are free to
leave and go elsewhere. Either that or simply to close down, refusing
to pay. This black mail tends to force governments to have to avoid
raising revenues by means that might cause a worsening of the already
worsening situation. As the situation progresses the tax base, as to
where revenues can be obtained, grows smaller and smaller until the

Re: Life

2008-11-26 Thread Mercury.Sailor

I dont feel guilty about shopping, I am actually enjoying
my time shopping! :o)


I do look for bargains, But its Christmas time and if I see something
I like for someone else, I will buy it. Needless to say I have hit
just about every one of my favorite stores.


I dont use credit cards, I dont even own a credit card. I use my debit
card, cha-ching!


No, saving is good. But spending is so much more fun! :o)




I am being a bad influence, Im sorry








On Nov 26, 9:13 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Congratulations (Mercury)

 Do not feel guilty. It is your money, you do not borrow it, why to
 feel guilty if you spend your money as you want? My perspective is
 life is to enjoy it according to our posibilities, what we really can
 afford, not beyond it.

 I should spend more, but I still save a lot. I have plans for the near
 future and I have to save money to make them real. That is ok although
 I should save less.

 Peace and best wishes.

 Xi

 On Nov 26, 3:50 am, Mercury.Sailor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



  I LOVE shopping, I haven't really done any shopping all year, But damn
  have I been making up for it and enjoying every second of it

  Yesterday I spoke to the wife of a famous scientist over the
  telephone, They live in New Mexico, The husband Sterling C*lgate works
  at The Los Alamos National Laboratory, Very intelligent couple. Well,
  during our conversation the wife started talking to me about old age
  and how when we get older and our bodies don't do what we would like
  to do, That's when you really learn to appreciate the smaller things
  in life such as walking, hiking, appreciating the beautiful
  sunsets. I just let her talk and I listened, Than I thought about it
  for a long time, Damn I learned to appreciate all of these things when
  I was in my early 20's. I'm glad I learn these important lessons at
  such an early age in life, When I go hiking or skiing, walking or just
  out for a ride on the back of my husbands motorcycle, That's when I
  appreciate how great life is and its here today and could be gone
  tomorrow.

  I know the economy isn't all that great and I shouldn't be out having
  such a great time spending my money like a drunken U.S President, But
  hey, Its my guilty pleasure and its Christmas time! So, I am simply
  having a wonderful Christmas shopping time!- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
World-thread group.
To post to this group, send email to world-thread@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/world-thread?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---