Starting from the beginning again :)
I adminster several small school networks and use wpkg to deploy packages to
several machines if it is quicker to use wpkg than to go around all
computers and do a manual install.
I want to be able to test a new package out or a modified one on an
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176
Marco Gaiarin g...@sv.lnf.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@sv.lnf.it
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177
Summary: Local install flag
Product: WPKG
Version: 1.1.2
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: wpkg.js
Hi,
I need some help to try and rectify a problem, of my making!
I manually edited the settings.xml to change from server1 to server2 but missed
the wrapper path and only changed the settings paths.
Now I have the path for the wrapper \\server1\wpkg\wpkg.js and the
settings/software as
Mandi! Rainer Meier
In chel di` si favelave...
Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Versione 5.7
Seems to be the latest version. Maybe re-installing it
(http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=47809025-D896-482E-A0D6-524E7E844D81displaylang=en)
could help. Just try.
...my
Mandi! Rainer Meier
In chel di` si favelave...
This is true as well and has been introduced quite recently by a heavy
improvement of the version comparison algorithm.
A little, probably unrelated question. There's a separator defined for
'internal subrevision'?
EG, for now i use, for
Hi Marco,
Marco Gaiarin wrote:
...my first try, but the installer say: «you have just the latest
version, thanks.». ;(((
Seems there's no way to reinstall...
Maybe it checks some (existing) registry keys and then exits. ProcessMonitor
might help to detect the right entries, remove them and
Hi Marco,
Marco Gaiarin wrote:
A little, probably unrelated question. There's a separator defined for
'internal subrevision'?
EG, for now i use, for firefox:
30141
for 3.0.14 internal revision 1; i use internal revision because i'm
human and male, so i make mistakes ;), and when i
Mandi! Falko Trojahn
In chel di` si favelave...
usually I do such upgrade things using a package, see attached.
A little question: why use:
cmd /c start /min msiexec
on install and simply only 'msiexec' on upgrade?
I'm curious... ;)))
--
dott. Marco Gaiarin
Mandi! Rainer Meier
In chel di` si favelave...
However this punctuation is very uncommon (I've never seen that before). I
I will use ':' just for it's 'strangness': well suited to mark and
'internal' subrevision number...
Many thanks.
--
dott. Marco Gaiarin
Marco Gaiarin schrieb:
Mandi! Falko Trojahn
In chel di` si favelave...
usually I do such upgrade things using a package, see attached.
A little question: why use:
cmd /c start /min msiexec
on install and simply only 'msiexec' on upgrade?
I'm curious... ;)))
Hmm.
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Meier r.me...@wpkg.org 2009-10-05 13:13:59 ---
a) If the user has no right to install applications manually, but he can
queue an installation via e.g. a tool similar to wpkginst where he
has a choice of applications
Chris Wilcox wrote:
I also use WPKG across 16 schools. One of the first things I did when
trialling and now using wpkg live was dredge out an old and unused PC
capable of running XP Pro and set this up as a test workstation for wpkg
packages before I roll things out to the live
13 matches
Mail list logo
