Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
In chel di` si favelave...
[i know it is one of the best flame-war topic, but can the list
configured to send messages even if users are in to:/cc:?
I manage lists by List-Id:, and this way i got message in list or off
list now and then... ]
Is there a website
For users i can use at least %APPDATA% for 'Application data', but for
the general profile (%ALLUSERSPROFILE%)?
Sgrunt, you're right, vista have what i need:
http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/3f1be40e-70c6-462c-9e8f-591d14d875cd1033.mspx?mfr=true
Marco Gaiarin schrieb:
Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
In chel di` si favelave...
AFAIK, normal users are not allowed to delete or change files in
%ALLUSERSPROFILE%?
Some local user have 'Power Users', they have to use a plethora of
educational software from the age of stone to modern
Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
In chel di` si favelave...
I think you can set it yourself - log in to the lists user interface, and
uncheck nodupes - you will receive both.
Ops! Is a user-based option? Sorry... i remember was a list- or
listserver-based option...
Anyway i've tried to login
Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
In chel di` si favelave...
So it's a matter of proper ACL settings I guess?
In Windows, you can even set the ACLs so that the file is not removable by
the admin (unless he changes the ACLs, of course), and for me a power user
is someone who has even less
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112
Rainer Meier [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #3
Hello,I am trying to install wpkg on a SAMBA share (\\d51-dde-01\diffusion\utilitaires\wpkg) in a windows domain. We are using fixed IP addresses.The profiles, hosts and packages files are read successfully, but there seems to be a problem with the IP-Address match . See the following message from
Hi Markus,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to install wpkg on a SAMBA share
(\\d51-dde-01\diffusion\utilitaires\wpkg) in a windows domain. We are
using fixed IP addresses.
The profiles, hosts and packages files are read successfully, but there
seems to be a problem with the
Mandi! Rainer Meier
In chel di` si favelave...
So just be patient. My time is quite limited at the moment...
No problem at all, it is a feature request, i can wait all the time
needed! ;)
--
dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66
Associazione ``La
Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
In chel di` si favelave...
No problem at all, it is a feature request, i can wait all the time
needed! ;)
In that case, it's rescheduled to December 2010 ;)
Ahem... ;-)))
Speaking of 'serious' things: the thread of last week about WPKGClient
and upgrade using
Marco Gaiarin schrieb:
Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
In chel di` si favelave...
No problem at all, it is a feature request, i can wait all the time
needed! ;)
In that case, it's rescheduled to December 2010 ;)
Ahem... ;-)))
Speaking of 'serious' things: the thread of last week about
Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
In chel di` si favelave...
I'm not sure how easy (or hard) to implement it is.
Mee too...
Surely, it will need some changes and should be fully supported in the
future (without hacks).
But I can't tell right now if an upgrade from 1.2.x to a newer version
Marco Gaiarin schrieb:
(...)
PS: and if we simply throw away the .msi installer and prepare a simple
batch script that do the job, copy files, setting registry keys, ...
In another way: what do the .msi installer on a *upgrade* process? Can
be substituted with a simple cmd script?
+
Hi Marco,
I'm still using 0.90, and surely i don't try to upgrade using the
procedure explained on:
http://wpkg.org/WPKG
You could even upgrade WPKG (server side) without changing the client
side at all.
PS: and if we simply throw away the .msi installer and prepare a simple
Mandi! Rainer Meier
In chel di` si favelave...
You could even upgrade WPKG (server side) without changing the client
side at all.
...and i'm doing exactly that! ;)
However currently it's clearly a resource problem.
...i'm really sorry to be of no help in that... ;(((
--
dott. Marco
Jens Geile schrieb:
Hi,
Basically the client cable was unplugged. In reality the client was
directly connected to the server through a normal ethernet cable not a
cross-over cable.
Mmmh... try with cable disconnected, i think it is not the same.
I pulled the cable out of the NIC and at
Rainer Meier schrieb:
(...)
No. I don't think this is the way to go. We are building up a
state-of-the-art software deployment environment and then we should
install one of the core components using a hacky cmd script? NO!
Probably switching to NSIS could be an alternative too. Just make
Mandi! Tomasz Chmielewski
In chel di` si favelave...
I need comments, comments, comments...
...as discussione or directly on-page?
--
dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66
Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia''http://www.sv.lnf.it/
Polo
18 matches
Mail list logo
