http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
--- Comment #2 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-15 12:34:00
---
Looks like I didn't update the mailing list address in bugzilla...
Added missing mails to the archives.
For those interested in what this thread is about, follow t
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
--- Comment #3 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-15 12:35:09
---
64-bit Windows world is a bit remote to me.
If we have a 64-bit version of WPKG Client, wouldn't we have problems getting
info about 32-bit apps?
--
Configure bu
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-15 16:54:28 ---
Hi Tomasz,
You're right but this is exactly what I introduced here.
The main problem is that HKLM\Software is re-directed to a "virtual store" for
32-bit apps (which is ac
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #7 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-15 19:12:53
---
Falko - please attach any changes as patches / diffs.
This way the changes are easier to spot and read.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #8 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-15 19:15:49
---
Created an attachment (id=86)
--> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=86)
diff between 1.0-rc4
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.c
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #86 mime|text/x-patch|text/plain
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resol
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79
Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #60 mime|application/octet-stream|text/plain
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-15 20:14:55 ---
I am sorry but usually I programming Java or scripting languages so not much
experience here as well. You could probably try cross-compiling the binary. I
can run it on my
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #9 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-15 20:37:30
---
I must be blind - there was a patch already in #5 ;)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail be
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #10 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-16
13:36:35 ---
Jens, does Falko's patch solve your problem?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #11 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-16
13:41:43 ---
> Could we get a setting for config.xml?
> (With maybe two empty lines after each log block)
Getting this supported properly (in config.xml) should be a four-line
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89
--- Comment #45 from Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-17 02:43:16 ---
I am pleased to report success with 1.2rc6
Thanks Tomasz.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94
Summary: /remove should remove dependend packages and/or profiles
Product: WPKG
Version: 1.0-rc2
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Prio
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94
--- Comment #1 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-17 10:40:18
---
Or, should it throw an error and say "Firefox depends on plugin_A, plugin_B:
use /force to remove without dependencies, or /deps to remove with
dependencies."?
--
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94
--- Comment #2 from Jens Geile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-17 10:41:54 ---
I think /remove should be enough to remove a package and all its dependencies
_UNLESS_ another package has the same dependency.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #12 from Jens Geile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-17 11:38:03 ---
Sadly not, I think. I just tried the patched version of wpkg.js by Falko and
couldn't get it to output the format I want.
I'll post three files as attachment with one file
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #13 from Jens Geile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-17 11:38:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=87)
--> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=87)
archive with example logfiles
Here are the example logfiles.
--
Configure bugmail: htt
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #14 from Jens Geile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-17 12:00:37 ---
Oh, and before I forget about it ... additionally to the "log_append" setting
in config.xml a "log_rotate" setting would be nice that automagically rotates
the logs after a
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89
Jens Geile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #15 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-17 12:38:10 ---
Reg. #12: If you are removing a package which has a newer revision on the
server, it is upgraded first so that wrong remove commands in local wpkg.xml
are overwritten. So
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #16 from Jens Geile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-17 12:42:12 ---
Reg. #15 Reg. #12: No, the revision on both the server and the client was the
same. I just removed the package from the profile. No update was done. Maybe we
could skip the
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #17 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-17 16:55:55 ---
Regarding #12:
I compared your level63 vs. your level127_2.log. Why do you need e.g.:
2007-12-17 11:28:00, PACKAGE : Getting profiles which apply to this node.
in a log
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #82 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #83 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94
--- Comment #3 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-17 17:06:18 ---
#1 I think /remove /deps is a good idea. As it is just for testing, it's of
course not so important to have, but convenient.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Co
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
--- Comment #8 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 11:00:27
---
What should I say? It works fine without the wrapper on my 32-bit system. ;)
Moreover, you are totally wrong, the files are there ;)
--
Configure bugmail: http:/
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #20 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18
11:02:37 ---
> For your convenience, here comes a zip file with patched wpkg.js
> (Tomasz, the patch is in attachment above ;-) and 4 files with
> only the messages sorted acco
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
--- Comment #9 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 11:49:30 ---
Rainer, should I be concerned about that (using wpkg.js-1.0-rc5 on XPSP1):
2007-12-18 11:02:26, ERROR : Error when searching registry sub-keys at
'HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsof
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 12:24:50 ---
That's actually a good question. It seems to happen when reading the uninstall
keys. In worst case this could lead to a situation that WPKG claims that
package are not ins
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #21 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 12:43:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=90)
--> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=90)
Loglevel patch against wpkg-1.0-rc5
Patch for more loglevels: check,debug,packages,sys
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #22 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 12:44:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=91)
--> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=91)
All logmessages from wpkg.js, sorted
#20: don't know ... zuzi in poland?
--
Configu
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #89 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 13:01:48 ---
@Falko: I just tried to reproduce that problem on my reference VMWare
installation. It's running on XP SP2 (not SP1 as your one). I was not able to
create such an error.
T
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #23 from Jens Geile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 13:37:57 ---
I was running the wpkg.js from #6 with loglevel=27 and i got all those package
messages i dont want/need.
I checked your logmessages from #22 and dinfo/sinfo/cinfo look fin
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #88 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #25 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2007-12-18 14:55:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=93)
--> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=93)
wpkg.js 1.0-rc5 patched with loglevels
PS: our intention was:
with loglevel=7
- only
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #4 fro
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #2 fro
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23
Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resol
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65
Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32
--- Comment #8 from Paul Tietjens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-02 18:29:07 ---
We did originally try to set up WPKG under such a 'wrapper', and it failed to
meet our needs. Running the script securely was a primary concern (Executed
from a user's l
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32
Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Co
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32
--- Comment #10 from Paul Tietjens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-03 15:38:55 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Paul, what's the difference between using
>
> \\server1\share\wpkg.js
> \\server2\share\wpkg.js
>
> and your
>
> \\server1\share\wpkg.js /se
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32
--- Comment #11 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-03 18:18:23 ---
Nope. That's why you should use %SOFTWARE% in your packages. You can set
SOFTWARE=\\server1\share\... individually at each site, in wpkg-start.bat or
in settings.xml if y
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32
--- Comment #12 from Paul Tietjens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-03 18:43:01 ---
It would be, but our WPKG is deployed as a scheduled task on system start, and
we have had problems retaining environment variables in that case.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32
--- Comment #13 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-04
00:27:59 ---
> Nope. That's why you should use %SOFTWARE% in your packages. You can set
> SOFTWARE=\\server1\share\... individually at each site, in wpkg-start.bat or
> in setti
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32
Jerry Haltom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Com
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-08 22:59:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=94)
--> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=94)
New version 1.0 RC6 including /noremove enhancement.
Hello again ;-)
I am back with som
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-08 23:58:56 ---
@Falko: Any update on this?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA c
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
--- Comment #13 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-09 10:18:30 ---
#11: Rainer, I couldn't get further into this, since this didn't happen again.
I assume it had something todo with a WPKG Client update on this machine. So
perhaps this w
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #27 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-09 10:34:20 ---
Finally I added some of my comments and concerns about several debug levels to
the FAQ. Comments are still welcome but my position at the moment is very
clear. I am not go
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #14 fr
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55
Thomas Bøge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #8 f
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-11 16:45:36 ---
Huston, we got feedback ;-)
Very nice. Not often we get final confirmation. But yes, it's exactly what the
"verified" state is meant for.
I am not closing it yet. I would
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95
Summary: New type of commands - Downgrade
Product: WPKG
Version: 1.0-rc2
Platform: PC
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: wp
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-11 20:52:46 ---
Just a status update...
I did not forget about that change. However proper implementation and test
requires some time. There are numerous use-cases and variations (remove,
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96
Summary: Crash/exception when checking the value of a non-
existent registry entry
Product: WPKG
Version: 1.0-rc2
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
--- Comment #15 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-12
19:48:29 ---
Still, a 64 bit version of WPKG Client might be needed.
As I referenced that need here: http://wpkg.org/TODO_list#WPKG_Client - let's
leave this bug closed.
--
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #28 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-12
19:46:47 ---
Now this was a long justification.
Any other opinions? Pros? Cons? Should we close this bug and forget about it?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55
--- Comment #10 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-12
19:50:34 ---
I'll come back to it tomorrow (and perhaps upload a new version).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receivin
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
--- Comment #29 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-12 20:16:34 ---
Well I just clarified my position. But I don't like to just close it in order
to offend people who like to have such a modification. Unfortunately this
change is very bad
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95
--- Comment #1 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-13 12:16:38
---
Would be useful for me as well once or twice in the past.
Do you have any patches? ;)
Technically, it should be easy to implement - just add a "hook" for downgrade
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42
--- Comment #8 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-13 12:31:38
---
Isn't communication between wpkg.js and WPKG Client using the registry better?
Then, it would be independent of the flags used (/debug, /quiet etc.).
Other than
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-13 13:53:26 ---
Hi Tomasz,
I fully agree that a time value causes exactly the same problems and would not
be very helpful. Even if you specify a time value for each command (which will
be
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-13 14:10:02 ---
Added locally. This fix will be included within the next RC.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail b
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95
Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Co
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42
--- Comment #10 from Knud Ahrnell Albrechtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-14
06:39:25 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Let me write down what I think about this change...
>
> I thought about it for a while and came to some conclusions. First of all
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95
--- Comment #3 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-14 13:52:28 ---
Marco Gaiarin wrote:
>
> ...this could be really useful (we call it 'pinpoint' as in dpkg? ;),
> expecially for testing purpose: i can build a new recipe for a package
>
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95
--- Comment #4 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-14 14:03:18
---
>> In other words: how to deploy a new revision of the package for one chosen
>> profile only?
>... just use a new package, it doesn't cost anything :)
No, it won't
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95
--- Comment #5 from Falko Trojahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-14 14:55:49 ---
Reg. #3: http://wpkg.org/WPKG_flags#Rarely_used_parameters
use wpkg.js /config:anotherconfig.xml and/or /base:path-to-newer-xml-and-files
Reg. #4: why do you have a remov
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55
--- Comment #11 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-14
14:56:05 ---
It's downloadable now.
Perhaps, there were enough RC releases and we should make a release soon (one
more release for RC6, then no new features, wait two weeks for
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42
--- Comment #11 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-14
14:38:22 ---
> About registry based communication:
> Personally I think the registry is not the best place for
> inter-process-communication (IPC). Registry is a permanent setti
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-14 21:16:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=95)
--> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=95)
Fixed equality check on non-existing registry key yields exception
OK, I am releasing th
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED
--- Comment #13 fr
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-14 21:01:29 ---
OK, I agree that we should release it because if we continue as we did up to
now we will never get it released.
Unfortunately I already worked on Bug 94 and included a fi
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-14 21:38:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=96)
--> (http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/attachment.cgi?id=96)
Dependency tree removal
OK, as described within Bug 55 we are not going to implement any
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94
Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-14 22:47:50 ---
#10
> > 2008-01-12 20:30:00 - WPKGSTATUS Starting software synchronization
> > 2008-01-12 20:30:02 - WPKGSTATUS Tasks: INSTALL 3; UNINSTALL 2
> > 2008-01-12 20:30:03 - WPK
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55
--- Comment #14 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-15
10:46:21 ---
Milestone? Why not.
RC does sound like something which is to be released soon, which doesn't have
to be true.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/use
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95
--- Comment #7 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-15 10:45:45
---
Indeed, I also used to increase the revision to perform a downgrade once or
twice.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42
--- Comment #13 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-15
11:43:26 ---
> I hope you're not really thinking about WPKG client to store the exit code
> within the registry and WPKG.js is checking frequently if it is available
> (polling)
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96
--- Comment #4 from Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-01-15 12:13:16
---
Uploaded.
Nick, does it work for you correctly?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail becaus
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97
Summary: wpkg trapped in a loop after unplanned reboot during
uninstall
Product: WPKG
Version: other
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows Server 2003
Status: NEW
Sev
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98
Summary: Logging Inacuracy
Product: WPKG
Version: other
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: config files
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99
Summary: Realtime check would be nice
Product: WPKG Client
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
http://bugzilla.wpkg.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99
Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resol
1 - 100 of 1146 matches
Mail list logo
