doing a
response/collaboration, no???
cheers!
- Original Message -
From: "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: Fatima airhead ~
Steve,
Though I appreciate your reading and deconstructing my posts I
am
going
to
>>> off and
> > >>>> most times forget to say i redid em my error
> > >>>> or sometimes just put sd like AT THE BOTTTOM OF THIS this is
> > >>> SORRY
> > >>>> all unintentionional again my fau pau
> > >>
t yer form is but then i send
> em
> >>> off and
> >>>> most times forget to say i redid em my error
> >>>> or sometimes just put sd like AT THE BOTTTOM OF THIS this is
> >>> SORRY
> >>>> all unintentionional again my fau
whole point of
doing a
response/collaboration, no???
cheers!
- Original Message -
From: "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: Fatima airhead ~
Steve,
Though I appreciate your reading and deconstructing my posts I
of what yer form is but then i send em
>>>> off and
>>>>> most times forget to say i redid em my error
>>>>> or sometimes just put sd like AT THE BOTTTOM OF THIS this is
>>>> SORRY
>>>>> all unintentionional again m
o say that i really DID
appreciate
this
form - genius in fact what you're doing - and it was this very
subtlety that
blurs even more the authorship whatever - the whole point of
doing a
response/collaboration, no???
cheers!
- Original Message -
From: "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP"
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>> >> hey steve - just a note from me to say that i really DID
>> appreciate
>> >> this
>> >> form - genius in fact what you're doing - and it was this very
>> >> subtlety that
>> >> bl
tlety that
blurs even more the authorship whatever - the whole point of doing a
response/collaboration, no???
cheers!
- Original Message -
From: "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: Fatima airhead ~
Steve,
Though I
ty that
> >> blurs even more the authorship whatever - the whole point of
> doing a
> >>
> >> response/collaboration, no???
> >>
> >> cheers!
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
; subtlety that
>> blurs even more the authorship whatever - the whole point of doing a
>>
>> response/collaboration, no???
>>
>> cheers!
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To:
>> Sent: Thur
on, no???
>
> cheers!
> - Original Message -
> From: "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 6:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Fatima airhead ~
>
>
> > Steve,
> > Though I appreciate your reading and deconstr
Steve,
Though I appreciate your reading and deconstructing my posts I am going
to here take issue with the way you present your adjustments,
as misleading.
Though you got the right Subject line, I did not write:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:56:53 -0700 "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
F
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:56:53 -0700 "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fat i may fair ahead ~
> bone fried oval air
> be ear berry don id sir 8ths
> bistro covers stone
> bo is stereo can't idiot
> bloati
Fatima airhead ~
bonfire ovular
bearberr onidsr8
boistero overtone
boistero antidot
boating omnibus
2:40 3/29/07 752 bytes
This engaged and composed on the heels of having posted the Open the
Airways bit... PLEASE
14 matches
Mail list logo
