snot in my naychur.
[reaching for Ana]
At 20:58 on 3/31/07 in 730 bytes
Divizio wrote:
snot in my naychur ~
unguent jam hi tamp
unguent jam ml tine
Wyuom jam ni Gone
D^
On 31-Mar-07, at 8:32 PM, Tom_ Lewis wrote:
in post-molested, pre-chewed, perfecly modern text?
SD: every syllable's labored and every labcoat labelled,
"your code is mine, mavenly remonstrator" --
I was fuckin on your side, Deuteronomy.
so slit me a god that has no split hooves,
and tell him it wasn't anything personal.
and anyway this is officially my word, my carte blanche:
you are allowed to dismantle anything I write and call it your'n,
or flush it down, or claim that I wrote it --
the best piece I ever did
I threw out a window in the city
and let the cars drive over it.
now, take offense at that, why dontcha?
tl
On Friday, March 30, 2007, at 01:11PM, steve d. dalachinsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Youth smights conned sider red moving theme pipeline
movement then maligns remedy love these fine/lined
forms good snakes never yonder moved then linen
glory gonads strayed spilly, atttired, pre con instructing
knot slin guise stick Dumb Numb Acoustic travail able to predudice
gister
may pot sticc. may cod fish ours, heave lonely maker
On Friday, March 30, 2007, at 12:03PM, "steve d. dalachinsky"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sorry i sit there at machine answer emails and in betweeen either
push
foward or reply to one of yours or someone else's texts then wthout
the
aid of anythi
ng but the 2 fingers and silly tired brain
reconstruct
pieces of others as soon as possible no real genius or anything
even too dumb to be aware of what yer form is but then i send em
off and
most times forget to say i redid em my error
or sometimes just put sd like AT THE BOTTTOM OF THIS this is
SORRY
all unintentionional again my fau pau
sd
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:32:40 -0700 "rzep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
hey steve - just a note from me to say that i really DID
appreciate
this
form - genius in fact what you're doing - and it was this very
subtlety that
blurs even more the authorship whatever - the whole point of
doing a
response/collaboration, no???
cheers!
----- Original Message -----
From: "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <WRYTING-L@LISTSERV.WVU.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: Fatima airhead ~
Steve,
Though I appreciate your reading and deconstructing my posts I
am
going
to here take issue with the way you present your adjustments,
as misleading.
Though you got the right Subject line, I did not write:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:56:53 -0700 "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Fat i may fair ahead ~
bone fried oval air
be ear berry don id sir 8ths
bistro covers stone
bo is stereo can't idiot
bloating ominous
Do what ever you want of course, but I request you please make
your
adjustments to my initial presentation appear to be your
adjustments.
As you present them it appears I wrote what is above here. I
did
not.
You don't show my original and so, I think you're confusing
what
is
already quite a difficult poetic. Congratulations.
What I post has maintained a certain form these last 9 years
and
so the
"form" is apparently important to me.
You might consider removing the line <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Thanks.
P!^VP
On 29-Mar-07, at 2:55 PM, steve d. dalachinsky wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:56:53 -0700 "P!^VP 0!Z!^VP"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Fat i may fair ahead ~
bone fried oval air
be ear berry don id sir 8ths
bistro covers stone
bo is stereo can't idiot
bloating ominous
sd
2:40 3/29/07 752 bytes
This engaged and composed on the heels of having posted the
Open
the
Airways bit... PLEASE!
I only saw one Dr, not 8, and oni is devil in Japanese and
yes,
there
may be... boisterous overtones the antidote.
BRING THEM HOME!
P!^VP
P!^VP
