Re: [WSG] New CSS site

Hi Peter...very clean looking site...sweet indeed. Only crit I found was in your div class=featurebox the img's (FEATUREARTCLE) (GO) move approx: 3px to the right when hovering over the latter - in Opera 7.11 Build 2887. Apart from that totally mini-glitch, the site looks brill. Well done.

Re: [WSG] Eric Meyer's Pure CSS pop ups

You might consider using UDM 4.0, which uses both CSS _javascript_. Someone mentioned it on this list a few days ago and its a great solutionits very flexible and accessible and pretty widely supported. The XHTML validates, but unfortunately the CSS does not. I had considered using

[WSG] overflow IE problem

Hi; im trying to place a member login field on top of a ImageMapped Header... In mozilla i have it working perfect, but IE wont show the fields at all. #login{ overflow:hidden; width: 131px; color:#fff; font: 10px Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; height: 131px; background:

RE: [WSG] overflow IE problem

Hi 7, Can you please supply a link to the page in question as well as the CSS file(s). In order to help we need to be able to see it in action in case there is something else in the code affecting or conflicting with it. This also lets us see what language and version you are using and whether

Re: [WSG] Eric Meyer's Pure CSS pop ups

I've tried EM's pureCSS method before, and while it's kind of cool, I found the code ended up looking dodgy and hacked. I prefer to use a simple bit of javascript - it makes sense to other coders at a glance and seems far more appropriate. B

[WSG] Minor gripe

Hi everyone... a little OT (may be) A short time ago Peter Firmonger wrote to say could anyone who uses an Out of office auto email, to please desist. So here is my tuppence worth. When someone requires us all to view a link...can they please refrain from using the '' at the end of the url. As

Re: [WSG] new to css and WSG

That won't work Simply ataching the stylesheet does nothing. Sandra Woods wrote: Thanks Sandy come and play on the board http://www.artgally.com Come and see the art show http://www.artgally.com/cswart Come and see the poetry show http://www.artgally.com/cswpoetry I am really new to CSS just

RE: [WSG] New to WSG

Yep, getting that a lot this morning.. The details are at the end of the welcome email (which no-one seems to read)... I will warn you however that the digest version isn't perfect. I'm about to upgrade the mail server so we'll see if it improves but it is received as an email with attachments on

[WSG] Re: Accessibility: Accesskeys

I have collected some information about Accesskeys, thought I share. Here are some more: http://www.d.umn.edu/goto/accessibility#accesskey ___ Laura L. Carlson Information Technology Systems and Services University of Minnesota Duluth Duluth, MN

Re: [WSG] Re: Accessibility: Accesskeys

Laura Carlson wrote: I have collected some information about Accesskeys, thought I share. Here are some more: http://www.d.umn.edu/goto/accessibility#accesskey Your collection of Web design references is surely one of the best on the Web. I know it scince Mr. Zeldman posted it on his site,

Re: [WSG] Eric Meyer's Pure CSS pop ups

Thanks for all the tips. With Regards Jaime Wong ~~ SODesires Design Team http://www.sodesires.com ~~

Re: [WSG] Accessibility checkers for Mac (OS X)

On 9 Mar 2004, at 14:08, Paul Ross wrote: You can download the free web developers toolbar extension for Mozilla and Firefox browsers which has a handy quick link to the Bobby WCAG 1.0 and Bobby 508 accessibility checker. You can get it here: Yeah, got that - I guess I'm being greedy, as I

Re: [WSG] Eric Meyer's Pure CSS pop ups

Does anyone use this technique http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/csshover.htmlin their website for image rollovers not necessary only for menu? I admit i am in my dense moment now and can't seem to understand the write up on the above mentioned site. Looking at the codes in the page doesn't

RE: [WSG] Minor gripe

Hi P. H. This kind of went off list, but I suppose Russ Peter could let you view the correspondence if you asked. Regards, JG --- P.H.Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Care to elaborate as to why ? I usually wrap long-ish URLs in opening and closing brackets, as that guarantees that they'll

Re: [WSG] Some more links for light reading

If anyone was looking for a support chart, here's another that's fairly detailed, for CSS2. http://www.macedition.com/cb/resources/abridgedcsssupport.html * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/

RE: [WSG] new to css and WSG

Yes it does help. I think what I am trying to ask is if I use Frontpage 2003 and make a style sheet. If I want to add tables do I do it with the style sheet and frontpage or just do it in front page. Thanks Sandy come and play on the board http://www.artgally.com Come and see the art show

[WSG] text and graphic on one line

Hi - I have been trying to create a div header with background colour, border etc that has text (3 words) on the left and a logo on the same line but sitting on the right and I can't seem to get it right. I tried including the logo inside the h1 tags and this worked except for the position of the

[WSG] CSS Layout/Web Server Question

Hello from a first timer. My question is about how web servers deal out pages. I have just started working on a site, and do all my development and testing on an Apache 2 web server running locally on my Windows XP laptop. When I transfer the same files (html page, css and images) to my Unix

[WSG] opinions on use of css shorthand properties

I have noticed an increasing number of sites using shorthand properties for css eg: h1 { font: bold 12pt/14pt Helvetica } however I know that just like actual css implementation, different browsers support some/all/none of the shorthand properties so is it worth using shorthand to create a

Re: [WSG] text and graphic on one line

Maureen, The main question would be this; do you want the logo to be included on the page as essential content or do you see it as part of the presentation - if it is the latter, then you are probably best off putting it inside the CSS rather than on the page. Once this decision is made, there

Re: [WSG] opinions on use of css shorthand properties

The first question you need to asks is what browsers you intend to support. That will dictate many things, including the amount of shorthand css you use. For example, if you are including NN4 as one of your target browsers, this will limit the amount of shorthand CSS you can use. Once you have

Re: [WSG] CSS Layout/Web Server Question

You could try using css to set the text area width instead of rows=2 cols=15 eg: textarea.mnemonic { height: 150px; width: 100px; } -- Neerav Bhatt http://www.bhatt.id.au Matthew Magain wrote: Hello from a first timer. My question is about how web servers deal out pages. I have just started

RE: [WSG] CSS Layout/Web Server Question

Thanks for the quick reply Neerav, that did indeed give a more consistent result for the textarea. I should have realised that it is smarter to use CSS for those dimensions. There is still the issue of: why? I am baffled as to why for example, the grey border is different in IE6 when viewed

Re: [WSG] text and graphic on one line

Hi Maureen How about making the logo a background-image with background-position : top right; in the box you wish? If the image adds meaning to the page (i.e requires an alt tag for people browsing without images) then this is probably not the best thing to do. If the heading/text conveys

RE: [WSG] opinions on use of css shorthand properties

I agree with Russ - it's a mostly a matter of personal preference. Initially shorthand can be confusing but with time it becomes the easier option. One more thing: font-variant: normal; font-style: normal; font-stretch: normal; font-size-adjust: none These are all completely