This has nothing to do with removing bullets. In fact, it's got nothing to
do with HTML.
I just thought you should know that accommodation (2nd from the top)
should have 2 'm's. :-)
Regards,
Jonathan Cooper
Manager of Information / Website
Art Gallery of New South Wales
Sydney, Australia
PF Yeah, I think were probably done on this topic. The point is that the
PF scientific community's need for italicisation of species names IS a visual
PF one and it predates the web by centuries.
...
Well, you decide, done or not :)
There is NO need to write in italic anything just for the sake
hi Jonathon ...
that was noticed and fixed promptly :)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Removing bullets
This has nothing to do with removing bullets. In fact, it's got nothing to
do with HTML.
Hello,
I am a new member of this group. I would like to know
if there is any HTML/XHTML, CSS Validation Tools
available Linux ?
Currently I am using Bluefish Jext as my html/xhtml
css editors. Is there any way I could validate my
html/xhtml css locally on linux box ?
Any help would be
Hi Bert,
With Netscape 7.01 your select boxes are not working - they get
selected, but the options don't drop down and cannot be chosen. Is
this a fieldset issue? Visited Russ's example too, but he's not using
select boxes.
Bert Doorn wrote:
Russ (maxdesign) suggested I
used fieldset (and
G'day
With Netscape 7.01 your select boxes are not working - they get
selected, but the options don't drop down and cannot be chosen.
Hmmm. Interesting. The request a quote page has valid XHTML1.1 and the
CSS is valid too. It works fine for me in Mozilla 1.6 and Firefox (on Win2K
and
I might revert to tables for layout - no headaches with those.
quote
Stop! Before you do anything, the most important thing you can do for your
learning process is accept that a) it¹s going to take time, and b) you will
be frustrated along the way.
/quote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I just thought you should know that accommodation (2nd from the top)
should have 2 'm's. :-)
Sorry to continue an OT, but I did some SEO research recently for an
accommodation client, and according to http://www.wordtracker.com nearly half
the search engine queries done
Thanks Russ
quote
Stop! Before you do anything, the most important thing you can
do for your learning process is accept that a) it¹s going to take
time, and b) you will be frustrated along the way. /quote
Been there and I do agree in principle - I like compact code that makes
sense. But
Hi Bert,
Beautiful layout btw.
Bert Doorn wrote:
Hmmm. Interesting. The request a quote page has valid XHTML1.1 and the
CSS is valid too. It works fine for me in Mozilla 1.6 and Firefox (on Win2K
and WinXP respectively). Is this ALL select elements, or just one or two of
them?
It is all of
quote
Stop! Before you do anything, the most important thing you can
do for your learning process is accept that a) it¹s going to take
time, and b) you will be frustrated along the way. /quote
Been there and I do agree in principle - I like compact code
that makes
sense. But if
Bert
Works for me in Mozilla 1.7 and Firefox. My OS is Fedora.
As for tables, use them for tabular data, not presentation. cells can't
exist outside their tables - boxes can be placed anywhere on the page
allowing you to completely separate the presentation logic from the content.
Try picking
Selects work fine with Netscape 7.1 on Win XP.
Rob
Robert Reed
SiteStart
www.sitestart.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Tenley Shewmake
Sent: 08 May 2004 12:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Forms, labels headers
Hi Bert,
I am wondering what to do about collecting data from form input into a
database/table automatically. I asked my host if they support ASP and
here's the response - We do not support ASP, that is a window platform.
You could actually us
php and mysql. We do support php snd mysql. Any ideas what I
I know the W3C validator is available as a Debian package (the link
checker is also part of the package) - we've got it running locally
here. The source of the HTML CSS validators are available if thats
the sort of thing you are looking for.
http://validator.w3.org/source/
On Sat, 08 May 2004 20:31:47 -0400, YoYoEtc wrote:
I am wondering what to do about collecting data from form input into
a database/table automatically.
As what language/OS to use is not a Web Standards issue (or isnt in the
context of this question), I suggest you just go with the answers you
Sorry - one other thing I forgot to mention... Tidy:
http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/tidy/
http://tidy.sourceforge.net/
Cheers
Mark
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
The voices are telling me that Kay Smoljak said on 5/6/2004 9:16 PM:
I don't see the confusion. The post asked about a WYSIWYG editor the
generates XHTML and CSS, not component that integrates with a Web app.
The same poster clarified in the third post in the thread with:
but to edit
The voices are telling me that Chris Blown said on 5/7/2004 2:28 AM:
Likewise, never rely solely on javascript based form input validation,
you should always check form inputs server side.
Hear, hear! Always write your PHP, CGI, etc. as though some pimply
little kid is going to throw a ton of
The voices are telling me that Bert Doorn said on 5/8/2004 9:28 AM:
Been there and I do agree in principle - I like compact code that makes
sense. But if it takes me 5 hours of experimenting to get a CSS Only
layout working in multiple browsers, I can't help but think why bother.
Because the
G'day
Especially when that same layout takes 5 minutes using tables and most
visitors can't tell the difference.
You have a defined, repeatable process (even if it's only fire up
$STEAM_AGE_WEB_PAGE_EDITOR) for making tag-soup web pages.
What I was talking about is not tag-soup
21 matches
Mail list logo
