White Ash wrote:
Hello,
I cannot seem to reconcile the following problems.
White, you've got numerous errors on the html file that you'll want to
correct before you do anything else. Tidy Online will correct most of
them for you: http://infohound.net/tidy/
(1) The sponsor placeholder
I've been using the dash and period in ID names a lot recently (part of
an unobtrusive DOM scripting set of functions I've been developing) and
not found any problems yet in any of the Win browsers. Whether IDs
formatted like this functionName.-fe-4r-6s-ef-s5-ef.2000 will work in
older browsers or
Hi!
Page: http://modulvegger.prosjektweb.net
Sheet: http://modulvegger.prosjektweb.net/sitestyle.css
Looks right in Firefox and Opera, but I've got big problems with the
intended look in IE.
Anybody out there who's had the same problem before? I guess the problem is
too close columns, i
Siteman DA - Bent Inge wrote:
Page: http://modulvegger.prosjektweb.net Sheet:
http://modulvegger.prosjektweb.net/sitestyle.css
Looks right in Firefox and Opera, but I've got big problems with the
intended look in IE.
No surprise there... :-)
You'll have to play with the 'hasLayout'
What big problems are there in IE? I'm looking at it in IE6 and the
only difference I see from FF 1.04 is the box in the center labeled
Testartikkel starts in green 1/2 down the box instead of the whole
height (I'm an English-only speaker though, so I feel kinda lost when I
look at the site
Using:
.groenn {
background: #3c0 url(a000.gif) no-repeat 0 0;
_height: 0; /* hasLayout trigger */
_margin-right: -3px; /* corr jog */
_margin-left: -3px; /* corr jog */
}
... as suggested by Georg in the previos mail, solved most of the problem,
so it's not too bad now, but still not
On Jul 8, 2005, at 1:37 AM, Chris Taylor wrote:
I've been using the dash and period in ID names a lot recently
(part of
an unobtrusive DOM scripting set of functions I've been developing)
and
not found any problems yet in any of the Win browsers. Whether IDs
formatted like this
I have a question about which is the better way to approach adding a
height width to an image for accessibilty/standards.
img src=image.jpg height=25 width=45 /
or img src=image.jpg class=thisimage /
and in the CSS have:
.thisimage{
height:25px;
width:45px;
}
or is either one o.k?
TIA
--
A few thoughts:
1) If you were to use CSS to specify size for the image, I don't think
you'd want to use a class, unless it was one of many images that fits
that style (i.e. a photo gallery thumbnail where 10-20 instances might
appear on one page). If you're just talking about one image, an
Bruce Gilbert wrote:
I have a question about which is the better way to approach adding a
height width to an image for accessibilty/standards.
img src=image.jpg height=25 width=45 /
or img src=image.jpg class=thisimage /
and in the CSS have:
.thisimage{
height:25px;
width:45px;
}
or is
Hey guys,
I'm trying to build a header for a new design.
Page:
http://www.solvepoint.com/design/sp4.2/
CSS:
http://www.solvepoint.com/design/sp4.2/css/sp-screen.css
IE CSS:
http://www.solvepoint.com/design/sp4.2/css/sp-screen-ie.css
The navigation is based on Suckerfish:
Nathan Rutman schrieb:
http://www.solvepoint.com/design/sp4.2/
1) (IE ONLY) When the page loads, the menu items are in the upper-left
corner of the screen until used the first time, then they jump into
place. I thought they needed layout and so assigned height attributes
to all items
12 matches
Mail list logo
