Olá a todos,
In this page - http://www.ouronor.com/problems/maquete.htm - I have a
semi-hidden menu (flash inside a div). This menu has only a visible tip
which is right below the logo. If you press it, the menu slides down...
well, it should, but Firefox (only in windows, curiously) is the
Always use example.com, example.org or example.net in examples in the
Heh I never knew about those! You learn something every day :)
thanks!
h
--
--- http://www.200ok.com.au/
--- The future has arrived; it's just not
--- evenly distributed. - William Gibson
Well... I agree, that the proposed markup-structure would be
semantically most correct:
ol
liItem 1
ul
liAdd/li
liEdit/li
liDelete/li
/ul
ol
liItem 1.1
ul
liAdd/li
liEdit/li
liDelete/li
/ul
/li
/ol
Rene Saarsoo wrote:
Well... I agree, that the proposed markup-structure would be
semantically most correct:
...
But can you imagine working with that sort of list in a browser
where stylesheets aren't available? For example in Lynx it would
look something like the following:
...
Whats so
All right, this is probably a less than gripping question and more
pertinent to academic writing. Nonetheless. The blockquote element
requires that it enclose block level elements--in my case usually a
p. Since blockquotes are usually in a run of text (#content p), it
picks up the content
Why are you using #blockquote?
You can target paragraphs et al within a blockquote with descending
selectors: blockquote p, blockquote a, blockquote cite, etc.
I'm getting a bit tired of my over the top blockquotes:
http://www.tdrake.net/durward-and-the-rocket/
But I have messed with some of
At 01:39 PM 1/28/2006, Paula Petrik wrote:
The blockquote element
requires that it enclose block level elements--in my case usually a
p. Since blockquotes are usually in a run of text (#content p), it
picks up the content p's line-height. But a blockquote,
typographically speaking, should have a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rene Saarsoo
Sent: Sunday, 29 January 2006 2:35 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] The dilemma: tabular data with sublevels
Whats so wrong with using good-old table... (skipped
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bert Doorn
Sent: Sunday, 29 January 2006 1:42 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] The dilemma: tabular data with sublevels
Rene Saarsoo wrote:
Well... I agree, that the proposed
Paul Ted,
Many thanks! What was I thinking? And why did I make that thoughtless
typing error--#blockquote?
Best,
Paula
Paula Petrik
Paula Petrik
Professor
Department of History Art History
Associate Director
Center for History New Media
George Mason University
On 1/26/06, Miika Mäkinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian, that was my point... small atleast *sounds* presentational
(thought it could indicate text that is less important) and that was why I
wasn't happy to see it's included in HTML5...
On 29/01/2006, at 8:57 AM, Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
[Add] [Edit] [Delete] Folder 1
[Add] [Edit] [Delete]SubFolder 1
[Add] [Edit] [Delete]SubFolder 2
[Add] [Edit] [Delete]SubSubFolder 1
[Add] [Edit] [Delete]SubSubFolder 2
[Add] [Edit] [Delete]
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
Bert Doorn wrote:
[ select category ] [ add ] [ edit ] [ delete ]
You can have option groups in the select. Example:
form action=whatever
select name=product
option value=Select Product/option
optgroup label=Fruits
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lachlan Hunt
Sent: Sunday, 29 January 2006 10:16 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] The dilemma: tabular data with sublevels
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
Bert Doorn
Select with Optgroups?
Tables with (assuming two levels), a structure like this:
tr
th id=fruit colspan=2Fruit/thtdAdd/td tdEdit/td tdDelete/td
/tr
tr
td/tdth headers=fruitApple/thtdAdd/td tdEdit/td
tdDelete/td
/tr
etc?
The other thing (this list is definitely the wrong place for me to say
Joshua Street wrote:
The other thing (this list is definitely the wrong place for me to say
this) is if this is for a content management system or the like, where
the client's browsing capabilities are a well known quantity,
What? How can you possibly assume that any user of a CMS will not
Heh, as I said, wrong place to say this.
I meant if the app were being developed for a specific client with
specific (known) requirements/user environment. Obviously there's the
hypothetical what if they hire someone who uses these technologies in
the future who ends up needing to use the CMS,
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
Although it's currently impossible with a normal select list,
you can instead use radio buttons or checkboxes within nested lists.
/
Just fill that out with all the necessary attributes and
values, then add some submit buttons for add, edit and delete.
/
small may sound presentational because that's what it is in HTML4.
But in HTML5 it refers to 'the small print' of a document, which is an
entirely different use of text from a standard paragraph.
The problem with that is that it *does* sound presentational and that people
will just assume that
Nic wrote:
What the WHATWG are doing which I think is clever, is they're reusing
existing, meaningless presentational elements where they can. If I
remember correctly, i has been re-specified too.
Quite the contrary, it's asking for problems.
Yes, I agree. Reusing presentational elements
How long have i and b been deprecated?
They're not deprecated.
Well, I'll be darned!
I've been using em and strong for so long I'd come to believe i and
b were deprecated...
Thanks Lachlan, for setting me straight.
I still won't use them though ;)
rantAnd on a side rant, could people
On 1/28/06, Ben Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's all
about separating _documents_ into component parts. There's nothing
presentational about them: You have headers on letters, official
documents and all sorts, thus there's now an element to identify that
section of a document. Same for a
Get your code to validate then repost if it still happens. I notice
about 40 errors when I ran it through.
Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sites by Joe, LLC
http://sitesbyjoe.com
(609)335-3076
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roberto Gorjão wrote:
Olá a todos,
In this page -
Christian Montoya wrote:
I think the W3C realized that a long time ago, and I think WhatWG will
go at this for a couple more years and say, hey, this html thing just
can't define everything, we need a technology that can support
applications, one that allows developers to define their own
Joseph,
What kind of validator are you using...? I had only 4 warnings and those
are now corrected. The page is considered valid both by the W3C
validator and by the Tidy utility that comes with the WebDeveloper toolbar.
Thank you.
Roberto
---
Joseph R. B. Taylor
25 matches
Mail list logo
