Re: [WSG] Re: Microformats was [ Is this a good use of dl ]

2007-07-09 Thread Maria Solange Siebra Borges
I m sorry !!I m learngin,I new thanks God bless you!! 2007/7/8, James Jeffery [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Microformats are about creating standards, standards for software vendors and web developers. In the future, with the use of powerful web technologies search engines and such will be able to

[WSG] Out of Office AutoReply: WSG Digest

2007-07-09 Thread Neville Clarkson
I am currently out of the office. If you need urgent assistance please contact Stephen Mahoney on 02 9215 9032 or 0403 090 022 or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards Neville Clarkson Senior Business Analyst - Online Information The Australia Council for the Arts

[WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread Dean Matthews
I don't understand what the W3C validator is objecting to here: Value Error : text-shadow Property text-shadow doesn't exist : #7f7f7f 2px 2px 2px Offending CSS: h2, h3 { margin: 24px 0 0; font-size: 1.4em; text-shadow: #7f7f7f 2px 2px 2px; color: #25447d;

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread Cameron Singe
Hey dean, I am probaly wrong, but i think text-shadow is a CSS3 spec which might not be picked up by the validation On 7/10/07, Dean Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand what the W3C validator is objecting to here: Value Error : text-shadow Property text-shadow doesn't exist

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread John Faulds
Text-shadow's part of the CSS3 spec and not CSS 2.1 isn't it? So if you're validating against CSS 2.1, you'll get an error. On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:03:46 +1000, Dean Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't understand what the W3C validator is objecting to here: Value Error : text-shadow

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread Dean Matthews
On Jul 9, 2007, at 9:16 PM, Cameron Singe wrote: am probaly wrong, but i think text-shadow is a CSS3 spec which might not be picked up by the validation Nope, your right. I thought I was dense but now I think the W3C is just behind the curve ;-) Dean

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Jul 10, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Dean Matthews wrote: I thought I was dense but now I think the W3C is just behind the curve ;-) Not really, just chose the appropriate options (advanced...) when you try to validate a file. Philippe --- Philippe Wittenbergh http://emps.l-c-n.com

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread Lucien Stals
Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream browsers currently support text shadows. (Does Firefox? I can only think of Safari 3, only available as the WebKit until Leopard gets released). So even once you have it validating, practically nobody will be able to appreciated your

[WSG] Client - Site Edits

2007-07-09 Thread Kevin Ross
Hi all, I am trying to find a solution to a nagging problem. Most of my client's sites are not very dynamic and I update them as the client requires. Because the updates are very infrequent, I have not been charging very much for this ongoing support. However, I have a new client who wants to

Re: [WSG] Client - Site Edits

2007-07-09 Thread James Gollan
Kevin Ross wrote: I am wondering for advice on this situation and I am also wondering how others handle ongoing updates after the initial design has been implemented. I am also wondering if a CMS system would, in any way, be a solution to a situation like this. Probably more appropriate for

Re: [WSG] Client - Site Edits

2007-07-09 Thread Jermayn Parker
In short yes it would probably be best... I had the same problem with a client and so I gave him the website in WordPress, so now I only do major style/ structure changes and he handles the content changes himself [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/07/2007 11:36:34 am I am also wondering if a CMS system

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread Matthew Ohlman
Lucien Stals wrote: Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream browsers currently support text shadows. (Does Firefox? I can only think of Safari 3, only available as the WebKit until Leopard gets released). So even once you have it validating, practically nobody will be

[WSG] Re: Client - Site Edits

2007-07-09 Thread Kevin Ross
Hi all, My apologies. I was just re-reading my own posts to this site and had forgotten that I had already asked this question, at least in part. I would still appreciate knowing how others would handle this situation. Regards, On 7/9/07, Kevin Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I

Re: [WSG] Client - Site Edits

2007-07-09 Thread Kevin Ross
Thanks guys... I'm going to see what's happening on the CMS List. Regards... On 7/9/07, Jermayn Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In short yes it would probably be best... I had the same problem with a client and so I gave him the website in WordPress, so now I only do major style/ structure

RE: [WSG] Client - Site Edits

2007-07-09 Thread Helen Rysavy
I get my clients to install SeaMonkey which has an inbuilt editor FTP client and is really good for basic text edits. http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ Cheers Helen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Gollan Sent: Tuesday, 10

Re: [WSG] Client - Site Edits

2007-07-09 Thread Matthew Ohlman
Kevin Ross wrote: Hi all, I am trying to find a solution to a nagging problem. Most of my client's sites are not very dynamic and I update them as the client requires. Because the updates are very infrequent, I have not been charging very much for this ongoing support. However, I have a

Re: [WSG] Shadow validation

2007-07-09 Thread Dean Matthews
On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:32 PM, Lucien Stals wrote: Regardless of whether it's valid or not, hardly any mainstream browsers currently support text shadows. Yes, well it really is a let down viewing a site in Safari or OmniWeb and then viewing it in IE or FF. I am finding quite a few